The Facebook-style New Age quote uses the "False Moral Equivalence" fallacy.
The statement deliberately collapses the power differential between the ruler and the ruled, between architect and victim, perpetrator and captive.
⭕ “Every human is capable of good and evil”
becomes in the audience's mind, in effect:
⭕ “Everyone’s equally responsible for evil.”
Clever trick. No wonder the intended One World Religion under the One World System is based on New Age / John Lennon Imagine claptrap.
That’s morally incoherent.
Every human can indeed do wrong, but that does not mean all wrongs are equal, or that the systemic evil of enslavement and deception is somehow balanced by the frailties of its victims.
This is like saying,
“Both the prison guard and the prisoner contribute to the problem of incarceration.”
Infantile nonsense. The power differential defines the moral context.
The Straw Man tactics of “utter incapability” are blatant.
I never claimed anyone is utterly incapable of evil. That’s a fabricated extreme inserted so they can appear “moderate” and “wise” in comparison.
This is rhetorical aikido: creating a position I never held, then sneakily refuting it to look enlightened.
Lazy, manchild tactics. “Hold a mirror up to a demon…”
This cliché assumes the conclusion it’s trying to prove. It suggests I'm demonic, and that my discomfort proves it. But I haven't shown any discomfort.
Pure Tom Pepper/Walter Mitty fantasy.
Real challenge = substantiated critique.
Fake challenge = name-calling and posturing.
“Only I can go after people…”
This is pure projection. I consistently:
⭕ Invite critique/debabte
⭕ Request rebuttals
⭕ Provide rationale, examples and receipts
Meanwhile, my "critics" offer clichés, slogans, tone policing and personal, resentment-driven character smears.
The rise of the shill patriot scene (bandwagons dressed up with Tommy Robinson, St George, Charlie Kirk) has given rise to a dialectical bandwagon scene dismissive of real-world suffering, injustices and iniquities.
A subtle way of blaming ordinary people for their oppression.
We know that the intention of the rulers is for this crushing system to be tightened and intensified to a whole new level.
Imagine actively seeking to undermine earnest endeavours to engage with others and encourage better grounded, understanding of urgent, real-world problems.
People have the capability of finally shaking off the shackles. It's just below the surface, requiring only basic grasping of moral principles that any child understands. Yet the AstroTurfers on both sides of this fabricated dialect won't touch basic Right/Wrong with a bargepole.
Hi @HannaH94459220, you're pretending that you don't know what I am talking about and that I have twisted your publicly-visible words/behaviour.
Here's a thread explaining your "The masses are too dumb and conditioned to ever wake up" stance: a form of mockery or punching down.
No wonder @W6345789 was jumping for joy at your posts.
"They have no clue what it ACTUALLY means. They are now digging out their old Nokia phones and think it will save them."
This is a red flag.
@W6345789 That is a form of mockery. It’s not constructive criticism, it’s ridicule.
It paints fellow slaves who are trying to reject they slavemasters' illegitimate systems that are 𝙚𝙭𝙖𝙘𝙩𝙡𝙮 𝙚𝙫𝙞𝙡 𝙚𝙣𝙨𝙡𝙖𝙫𝙚𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 as foolish and clueless idiots.
🧵Horrendous post from anti-dissenter activist and Twitter's chief gaslighter @w6345789.
The category of human you are undermining (people who get annoyed at smart meters) do not exist. Concern about smart meters is merely part of ethical people's opposition to control systems.
Ethical people who oppose control and domination (who you go out of your way to undermine) care about consensual interaction, personal sovereignty and decentralisation. o
Opposition to smart meters stems from ethical principles and elementary concerns about control.
Smart meters are a violation of privacy and autonomy.
Smart meters monitor and transmit detailed real-time data about personal energy use, turning a human's private home into a monitored environment.
🧵THREAD: The dialectic is always the same: invent a monster, offer a saviour, then deliver something far worse while we’re distracted.
Beware of the manipulations from the mainstream media and from alternative media shills. When a topic is being amplified, it's the agenda.
Be united against the digital control grid, but beware of fake calls to unity which are conditioning us to be brainwashed idiots (like this new wave of Charlie Kirk and Tommy Robinson drones who would go along with any digital technofacism if it had a freedom sticker on it).
Don’t let panic over Digital ID herd you into voting for controlled “saviours.”
The real threat is bigger: the technological world-state being assembled (for which Digital ID is indeed the essential ingredient needed for it to work) while we argue over SCRIPTED DISTRACTIONS.
"But people, esp. women & kids, in major European cities fear for their lives"?
All the more reason to focus on the rapists and the terrorists (i.e. the 0.1%), the elite grooming and trafficking operations, etc, instead of focusing on fellow slaves of the 99.9%...
I'm talking about who’s orchestrating migration (the ruling class / 0.1%, who also happen to orchestrate terrorism, sex trafficking, the rape gangs they groom, child abuse, etc).
You're shifting focus away from the architects to fellow slaves.