The Facebook-style New Age quote uses the "False Moral Equivalence" fallacy.
The statement deliberately collapses the power differential between the ruler and the ruled, between architect and victim, perpetrator and captive.
⭕ “Every human is capable of good and evil”
becomes in the audience's mind, in effect:
⭕ “Everyone’s equally responsible for evil.”
Clever trick. No wonder the intended One World Religion under the One World System is based on New Age / John Lennon Imagine claptrap.
That’s morally incoherent.
Every human can indeed do wrong, but that does not mean all wrongs are equal, or that the systemic evil of enslavement and deception is somehow balanced by the frailties of its victims.
This is like saying,
“Both the prison guard and the prisoner contribute to the problem of incarceration.”
Infantile nonsense. The power differential defines the moral context.
The Straw Man tactics of “utter incapability” are blatant.
I never claimed anyone is utterly incapable of evil. That’s a fabricated extreme inserted so they can appear “moderate” and “wise” in comparison.
This is rhetorical aikido: creating a position I never held, then sneakily refuting it to look enlightened.
My criticism is directed at a very specific religious/quasi-religious ideological subset: the activist types like yourself and @Travelling_Sign who loudly push certain values I believe are harmful because they ultimately serve systems of control rather than freedom.
@Travelling_Sign Many “New Age” people actually share my values, so if I shouldn’t use the term New Ager, I accept that. It’s probably unfair to those sincere yoga, mindfulness-types who genuinely understand principles.
A One World Religion as part of a One World System is what the globalist ruling establishment is seeking.
⚠️ Disclaimer:
When I refer to New Age in my commentary, I am not referring to individuals who simply practice yoga, meditation, mindfulness or healthy lifestyle choices.
I am referring to a cultish belief system and ideological mindset.
One that often overlaps with the New Age, the Self-Help industry, and spiritual influencer spheres.
It is a quasi-religious worldview marked by:
⭕ 𝙎𝙥𝙞𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙪𝙖𝙡 𝙗𝙮𝙥𝙖𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙜
(using positivity or detachment to avoid confronting injustice)
⭕ 𝘾𝙤𝙨𝙢𝙞𝙘 𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙞𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙢
(recasting all suffering as spiritually necessary or illusory)
Lazy, manchild tactics. “Hold a mirror up to a demon…”
This cliché assumes the conclusion it’s trying to prove. It suggests I'm demonic, and that my discomfort proves it. But I haven't shown any discomfort.
Pure Tom Pepper/Walter Mitty fantasy.
Real challenge = substantiated critique.
Fake challenge = name-calling and posturing.
“Only I can go after people…”
This is pure projection. I consistently:
⭕ Invite critique/debabte
⭕ Request rebuttals
⭕ Provide rationale, examples and receipts
Meanwhile, my "critics" offer clichés, slogans, tone policing and personal, resentment-driven character smears.