fozzil🏵 Profile picture
Nov 8 11 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Did St. Augustine support the direct invocation of saints? Bl. Chemnitz argues NO. His views were consistently directed away from the practice. 🧵

If my Romanist friends have a citation from his work which seems to suggest he did,, please share it below. Peace of Christ :)
How did he understand the departed saint?

1. The blessed in heaven remain concerned for the church militant, sustaining a general care and interceding for us. Image
2. Martyrs can obtain favours from the Lord due to their patience, but this power derives entirely from God.

De civitate Dei, Bk. 22, ch. 9: “The martyrs can obtain such things from the Lord, and that on account of their patience they now have power.” Image
3. When tackling the question of whether the saints are aware of the affairs of the living, he binds his conscience to the Word of God and denies that they do. (1)

And in what way the saints can be said to aid the living, he sees it as a great mystery. (2) Image
Image
4. Prayer is a spiritual sacrifice owed solely to God.

Ps. 50:14–15: “Offer to God a sacrifice of thanksgiving … and call upon Me in the day of trouble.”

Heb. 13:15: “Through Christ let us continually offer up a sacrifice of praise to God...that acknowledge His name.” Image
5. Saints are honoured with latreia (honoured through love, remembrance & imitation of men in this life ), but not worshipped; Christ alone is Mediator. Image
Image
Image
6. Attempts to seek intercession from angels or saints and not Christ are misguided. Image
7. St. Augustine recorded dozens of healings, visions, and exorcisms, which he credited to God, who works through angels or martyrs, using the occasion to confirm faith in Christ’s resurrection. Image
8. Therefore, we distinguish that Latreia belongs to God alone, douleia may extend to creatures, but cannot justify invocation or adoration. Image
In conclusion, according to St. Augustine, the saints are to be honoured through love, remembrance, and imitation. This is what he meant when he said duoleia, not what has been later attributed to him by the papalists. Image
unroll @threadreaderapp

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with fozzil🏵

fozzil🏵 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bonesforsales

Aug 6
7 reasons why infernalism is actually the heresy!🧵
1. Only What Participates in God Can Exist Eternally

Argument: God alone is eternal by nature. All else exists by participation. Therefore, no created thing, including a condemned soul,can persist eternally apart from God.
2. Eternal Condemnation Implies God Sustains Evil

Argument: If a damned soul remains in a state of privation forever, and God sustains all being, then God must sustain the state of eternal evil or non-being. This contradicts divine goodness.
Read 8 tweets
Jul 23
A Critique of Revivalist & Restoration traditions on Sola Scriptura from a Classical protestant.

Many of these churches (Pentecostal, Charismatic) affirm sola scriptura: “The Bible alone is our authority.”
But are they really consistent with that claim?
Let’s talk about it.🧵 Image
What is Sola Scriptura?
Sola Scriptura is the belief that Scripture alone is the Church’s only infallible rule of faith, and that Tradition is fallible and subordinate, valid only insofar as they conform to Scripture. Image
They reject tradition but affirm the Trinity, an expression not found in scripture but Tradition.
Read 13 tweets
May 6
Hey! Prots want a solid argument against prayer to the saints from a Church father?

St. Gregory of Nyssa (Against Eunomius 1:34-35) insists on Uncreated-created distinctions that should be used to critique the concept of prayer to the saints in R.C & E.O!🧵 Image
TL;DR:

St. Gregory of Nyssa's arguments for Uncreated vs. Created distinction Against Eunomius should be used by Prots to refute core errors in both R.C and E.O. traditions- to crush the concept of prayer to the saint, which blurs the Creator-creature line and risks dualism🔥
The unity between the Father and the Son in Scripture is not just about shared will or mission.

St. Gregory of Nyssa makes this clear: The unity is ontological; They are one in essence, not just in purpose. Image
Read 14 tweets
Apr 26
Was Adam created holy by nature, or was his righteousness a superadded gift?

In this thread, I’ll argue that the Catholic doctrine of donum superadditum weakens creation’s goodness, the fall’s seriousness, and redemption’s necessity. Let's take a look!🧵 Image
TL: DR:

The Catholic view that Adam’s holiness was a superadded gift, not inherent, weakens creation’s goodness, the fall’s severity, and redemption’s necessity.
Scripture and the Fathers affirm Adam was created truly righteous, fully upright by nature. Image
The Biblical View:

Scripture says God made man “very good” (Gen 1:31) and in His image (Gen 1:26–27), with wisdom, holiness, and righteousness (Eph 4:24; Col 3:10).
If Adam was created upright, why does Catholicism say his holiness was a separate gift, not part of his nature?
Read 12 tweets
Mar 29
How St. Aquinas Fumbles the Eucharist: Aristotle’s Disapproval and Why Lutherans Are the Real Aristotelians.

Buckle up Catholics(Thomists) time to become Lutheran!🧵
TL;DR:
Transubstantiation contradicts Aristotle’s hylomorphism because it unnaturally separates substance (form) and accidents (matter) in a way that Aristotle would reject. Catholics(Thomists) must ditch it or concede to sacramental union (Lutheran W)
What's hylomorphism?
Every physical thing is a union of form (essence) and matter (material composition). These two aspects are inseparable in defining what a thing is.
The form gives something its identity, while the matter is the material through which that form is expressed. Image
Read 20 tweets
Mar 7
Does 1 Corinthians 3:13-17 and the Church Fathers support purgatory? 🧵

The “fire” represents God’s judgment on works not souls (1 Peter 1:7). This aligns with the Spirit’s sanctification in life (John 16:13; 2 Thess. 2:13) & the final test at Judgment Day (Mal. 3:2–3). Image
Just as Christ’s work was completed at His death (John 19:30), the fire of 1 Cor. 3:13:
🔥 Refines throughout life
🔥 Fixes our works at death (Heb. 9:27)
🔥 Reveals their worth at judgment (Rev. 20:12)
It doesn’t describe ongoing purification after death.
At judgment, our works (rooted in grace, Eph. 2:8–10) determine reward or loss(1 Cor. 3:14–15), like David’s unbuilt temple—honored by intent but never realized(2 Sam. 7).

To be “saved as through fire” (v. 15) means escaping the loss of works, not purification of the soul.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(