@LibertyCappy LASIK is a narrow, elective service in a highly controlled market. Real healthcare has to handle the entire messy reality of human illness — emergency, chronic, unpredictable, & life-saving.
Govt. doesn’t cause high costs — unregulated private complexity and profiteering do.
@LibertyCappy LASIK isn’t cheap because it’s “free market.” It’s cheap because it’s simple, standardized, & elective.
Single, low-risk procedure: LASIK is a routine, outpatient surgery done under local anesthesia. No hospital stay, minimal risk, and the same few tools used thousands of times.
@LibertyCappy Cash-based, not insurance-based: Because everyone pays out of pocket, clinics compete directly on price and marketing. There’s a limited range of services and few surprises.
@LibertyCappy LASIK is High volume + predictable results = lower cost: Surgeons can do dozens a day, reusing equipment and streamlining costs. It’s the same principle as mass production.
@LibertyCappy So LASIK’s price stability comes from simplicity, competition, and scale — not from the absence of government or insurance.
@LibertyCappy Medical procedures covered by insurance are different in nearly every way.
Highly variable: Surgeries for appendicitis, cancer, or heart disease are unpredictable — they differ in duration, complexity, and patient condition.
@LibertyCappy Hospital environment: These require anesthesiologists, nursing teams, sterile rooms, ICU backup, post-op care — and hospitals have huge fixed costs to maintain 24/7 readiness.
@LibertyCappy Billing complexity: When insurers (public or private) negotiate prices, they build in administrative overhead, cross-subsidization, and safety-net funding.
@LibertyCappy Emergency mandate: Hospitals must treat you even if you can’t pay (by law under EMTALA). That “free care” cost gets built into other bills.
So comparing LASIK to hospital surgery is like comparing a car wash to a car repair shop that must fix anything, anytime, for anyone.
@LibertyCappy The claim that “government makes healthcare expensive” ignores that the U.S. has the least socialized system—and the highest costs.
@LibertyCappy The U.S. spends far more per person on healthcare than any country in the world — about twice as much as the OECD average — yet has the least publicly run system.
@LibertyCappy Countries with “socialized medicine” (like the UK, Canada, France, or Japan) all spend less and achieve better average health outcomes.
@LibertyCappy The driver of cost in the U.S. is private-sector pricing power, not government control. Hospitals and insurers negotiate opaque, inflated prices because there’s no centralized price control.
@LibertyCappy If “government trying to make things cheap” caused costs to explode, those other countries would be bankrupt — but they’re not.
@LibertyCappy Why insured surgeries look expensive in the US
List prices are fake: The “$50,000 surgery” figure is a sticker price used for negotiation; insurers pay far less.
Cross-subsidies: Hospitals charge more for insured patients to cover losses from uninsured or underinsured patients.
@LibertyCappy Administrative bloat: Private insurance adds layers of billing, coding, and denial management — 15–25% of costs are administrative, not medical.
Fragmented system: Every insurer, hospital, and state has its own rules. Centralized systems negotiate once, transparently, for all.
@LibertyCappy That logic is like saying:
“McDonald’s burgers are cheap — why can’t ER surgeries be?”
LASIK is a narrow, elective service in a highly controlled market. Real healthcare has to handle the entire messy reality of human illness — emergency, chronic, unpredictable, and life-saving
@LibertyCappy Government involvement doesn’t cause high costs — unregulated private complexity and profiteering do.
@LibertyCappy @threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
(1/) A video I replied to claims LASIK is cheap because it’s not government-controlled but “free market,” while insured surgery costs more because of “government” and “socialized medicine.” This sounds clever, but it’s deeply wrong.
Here’s why the comparison is bogus, step by step.
(2/) LASIK isn’t cheap because it’s a “pure market.” It’s cheap because it’s simple, standardized, and elective.
• One narrow procedure
• Low risk, short duration
• No hospitalization/ICU
• Predictable outcomes
That makes it easy to streamline and compete on price.
@DCVaxDefender 1/
Excellent thread. The post correctly reframes how we think about #Flaskworks and #NWBO's model for autologous cell therapy.
Here’s a short thread affirming the key points—and adding current confirmation of the UK’s regulatory position.
@DCVaxDefender 2/
First: yes, Flaskworks is not “decentralised” in the point-of-care sense. It’s not about moving production into hospitals. It’s a centralised, industrial platform for parallelised autologous manufacturing at scale.
@DCVaxDefender 3/
The GPU vs. CPU analogy is spot on.
Old model: sequential, manual, cleanroom-heavy.
Flaskworks: single instruction, multiple patient-specific batches, executed in parallel under unified GMP oversight.
It’s not fragmentation—it’s consolidation with scale.
Not your fault. But taxation without Representation was what got this entire experiment in democracy going. Presidents have some powers re Tariffs but not the complete and total powers required for this executive order. For heaven’s sake, make noise!
Despite being in the mi purity, you need to be speaking loudly and doing everything possible to both stop the tariffs legally, and embarrass the GOP into asserting Congressional Authority over the purse strings and Tariffs.
We do NOT have a KING and we NEVER WILL have a KING!
"The new documents contain “incendiary claims” about the former president, including accusations that he had sexual relations with “many girls”, made by one of Epstein’s alleged victims, Sarah Ransome."
"In the newly unsealed documents, Ms Ransome testified that her unnamed friend “was one of the many girls that had sexual relations with Donald Trump” – including at Epstein’s New York townhouse."