🧵The UN Security Council is circulating a draft “Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict,” creating the Board of Peace and an International Stabilization Force to oversee Gaza’s reconstruction and demilitarization. It all sounds administrative—until you read the fine print.
The resolution hands Gaza’s governance to a “Board of Peace” with quasi-sovereign powers over civil administration, economy, & movement in & out of the Strip—but never defines the borders. Israel could be pressured to allow “free movement” under humanitarian or economic pretexts.
Even more alarming, “movement of persons in and out” could imply maritime access, challenging Israel’s naval blockade. If the BoP or ISF claim Gaza’s coast, Israel could lose the ability to interdict arms, ceding control of its security to UN mandates it cannot veto.
Worse, authority quietly shifts from the BoP to the Security Council, which can redefine their mandates at will. The ISF can “use all necessary measures” to enforce demilitarization, while Israel is merely “consulted”—allowed to speak, but not to decide.
The resolution identifies no troop-contributing states & gives Israel no veto over them. That omission allows participation by states openly hostile to Israel or supportive of Hamas. Israel’s border defense could end up “coordinated” with militaries that deny its right to exist
Israel’s Article 51 right to self-defense is overridden by an international command between it and Gaza. If rockets resume, Israel must rely on the ISF or face condemnation. Peace comes at a cost: coordinating with potentially hostile actors while Hamas tests every red line.
The resolution grants full immunity to all BoP & ISF personnel for acts “in their official capacity,” shielding them from local or international prosecution. This is the same UN protection that has covered peacekeepers sexual abuses, arms trafficking, and terror collaboration.
In Gaza, this immunity would extend not just to foreign troops, administrators, but also local staff, protecting those most likely to divert aid or fund terror under the guise of “official duties.” Israel cannot tolerate another unaccountable UN experiment
The resolution bans organizations involved in diverting aid, but not the individuals responsible for it. Nor does it address the misuse of reconstruction funds—creating a loophole that allows staff implicated in misconduct & corruption to move from one organization to another.
The resolution bypasses the Oslo Accords, which require final-status issues be resolved bilaterally. Instead, it gives the UN unilateral power to reshape Gaza’s politics & security, replacing negotiated sovereignty with a trusteeship —overriding Israel by bureaucratic fiat.
The plan mirrors the UN’s 2004 MINUSTAH mission in Haiti: temporary oversight became decades of dependency, violence and abuse. In Gaza, “local police” trained by the ISF would merely rebrand Hamas’s networks under international sponsorship—continuity, not reform.
The resolution addresses reconstruction and demilitarization but ignores deradicalization. Without dismantling Hamas’s indoctrination—mosques, schools, media, charities—Gaza cannot be rebuilt. True peace requires confronting the culture of martyrdom, not merely its militias.
To protect Israel's rights, it must affirm its Article 51 self-defense, reject immunity for BoP/ISF personnel, require prosecution and compensation for crimes, grant Israel veto over all personnel, and tie the mission to clear benchmarks rather than open-ended renewals.
It must also ensure financial transparency with independent audits, mandate deradicalization programs in Gaza and the West Bank, limit Security Council control to acknowledgment (not administration) of BoP/ISF, and affirm the plan cannot override Oslo Accords or Israel’s rights.
Israel’s sovereignty cannot be undone by the UN. True peace requires accountability: Israel defending its people, Palestinians rebuilding institutions, and outsiders respecting their limits. Israel cannot afford that experiment on its border.
🧵Federal prosecutors unsealed a case after the FBI arrested Tomas Kaan Jimenez-Guzel, son of a senior UN official at UNWomen, and Milo Sedarat, son of an Iranian poet, for pledging allegiance to ISIS and plotting a Boston Marathon–style terror attack.
The two teens were alledgely part of an ISIS-inspired terror ring that shared antisemitic messages, glorified mass murderers, & plotted an attack called “Pumpkin” for Halloween night. Jimenez-Guzel posed with an ISIS flag and knife, discussing a “Boston bombing–like attack.”
When Acting U.S. Attorney Alina Habba announced the charges, she said the complaint showed “a pattern of antisemitic messages advocating violence,” along with tactical purchases and gun range photos.
🧵Sudan is in flames. Hundreds of thousands have died, over 10 million displaced, & famine spreads across the country. Yet the media barely reports it. In this war there are no heroes — just rival warlords, foreign backers, & civilians caught in a war the world chooses to ignore
In the last few days in El Fasher, North Darfur, the RSF massacred 1,500–2,000 civilians, including executions in hospitals. Satellite images from Yale show red-stained sand visible from the sky.
But lets start from the top. n 2019, Sudanese civilians overthrew Islamist dictator Omar al-Bashir, but his military system stayed intact. Generals Abdel Fattah al-Burhan (SAF) and Mohamed “Hemedti” Dagalo (RSF) shared power, then turned on each other — but mainly on civilians
🧵At Istanbul University, the "Gaza Tribunal" turned academia into a stage for terror propaganda. Framed as a “people’s court,” it brought together journalists, convicted terrorists and academics like Mahmood Mamdani, father of NYC candidate Zohran Mamdani.
Along convicted terrorists, you had Ramzy Baroud, editor of The Palestine Chronicle — a U.S. non-profit posing as journalism, facing a lawsuit for hiring a Hamas terrorist who held 3 Israeli hostages, Mahmood Mamdani, father of NYC candidate Zohran Mamdani and Katie Halper.
A @JewishOnliner investigation found that the Gaza Tribunal’s featured speakers tied to designated terror groups. Raji Sourani (PFLP), Sahar Francis of Addameer (U.S.-designated PFLP affiliate), and PIJ convict Sami Al-Arian with Mahmood Mamdani, father of NYC Zohran Mamdani.
🧵In Dec 2023, as Israel buried its dead, WHO officials met in Geneva to plan how to “scientifically” prove famine in Gaza and use it to pressure Israel. Dr. Michel Thieren, WHO’s envoy to Israel, said the using the terms “famine” were decided before any evidence.
He told the Mosaïque podcast that in Geneva: “There was a gathering of experts who asked the question quite forcefully. I was there, and I was absolutely stunned. What they were saying, essentially, was that one should try to find a term that could be used to exert pressure. ”
But the deeper scandal, as he described it, was that the verdict had already been written.
🧵Today in Hanoi, governments will sign the UN “Cybercrime” treaty—a supposed global cybersecurity pact that in reality empowers authoritarian regimes, erodes human rights, pressures democracies, and criminalizes free speech, ethical hacking, and online dissent
On paper, the UN Cybercrime treaty fights online crime & sharing digital evidence. In reality, it’s a blueprint for digital authoritarianism—drafted by Russia & China, approved in December 2024, & signed in Vietnam, a one-party state where online criticism can land you in prison
The treaty is dangerously vague. Its broad definition of “cybercrime” could criminalize anything a government dislikes. Mutual legal assistance rules would let authoritarian states demand data from democracies, creating legal cover for repression worldwide.
🧵Next week, the UN’s International Maritime Organization will vote to impose the first global tax — disguised as a “Net-Zero Framework” on shipping emissions. The consequences estimates global shipping costs rising by 10% or more.. This is not climate policy—it’s control.
Disguised as a “Net-Zero Framework” on shipping, the UN plan imposes carbon penalties, funnels funds into a UN-controlled bureaucracy, and redistributes them—without citizen consent. For the first time, taxation without representation will exist at the global level
Next week’s vote follows IMO’s April 2025 approval of the Net-Zero Framework, the first binding system linking emissions caps to a global pricing scheme. Ships over 5,000 tons must buy “remedial units” if they exceed limits, with revenues funneled into a UN-controlled Fund.