1/ Think BBC is biased? UK academic research funding (UKRI) is far more so.
% of UK's £9b research funding going to left scholar activism has exploded.
Findings from my NEW @HeterodoxCentre @UniOfBuckingham report based on big data analysis of @UKRI_News research grants
2/ On UKRI's web pages, mentions of 'equality' trump 'excellence', and the balance has been growing ever more skewed
3/ Social justice terminology has been soaring in UKRI awards as millions in grant research is diverted toward cultural left 'Social Justice' research
4/ Worse, the REF 2029 audit, which governs prestige rankings & doles out £2 billion to universities, will massively boost the importance of Equity, Diversity & Inclusion (EDI) in the sector.
Why? Because excellence = 'epistemic injustice'! (h/t @ProfAliceS @timeshighered)
5/ University REF scores are shaped by cultural left kitemarking organisations @AdvanceHE & Athena SWAN. Universities compete for the highest 'gold' award from them. The joint UKRI/Advance HE report is heavy on gender and race, with no real interest in class
6/ UK trends echo those in the US and Canada
(h/t reports on NSF from @lokitekone & Canada Tri-Councils from Dave Snow at U. Guelph)
7/ At heart is a philosophical difference about what taxpayers should fund: cultural socialism (identity group equality within the elite) or cultural flourishing (research excellence)
UKRI is acting like people want cultural socialism.
They don't.
8/ I estimate £20 million is going to scholar activist research @ESRC & @ahrcpress each year. Far more including other councils & UKRI EDI spending.
Can the UK afford this? Should Tory & Reform voters fund their opponents' ideology?
Examples h/t @CharlotteCGill @WokeWaste
9/ Recommendations:
UKRI's budget be reduced by its EDI spend
EDI should be stripped out of the REF 2029 Environment score
Publication metrics, the least ideological measure of research excellence, should play a major role in REF 2029
UKRI must pivot from EDI to excellence
10/ If UKRI thinks it can just do business as usual and ignore the right, it could face a nasty surprise if Reform is elected. Falling conservative trust could bring an axe down on research funding - a shame as much of it adds intellectually & economically to Britain
1/ NEW: Announcing the Buckingham Manifesto for a Post-Progressive Social Science
Just released at @chronicle
Signatories span the range from anti-Trump liberals (i.e. @sapinker @clairlemon) to conservative reformers (i.e. @realchrisrufo @GadSaad)
A new intellectual movement
2/ This is an intellectual manifesto, not a policy statement. A high cultural and research agenda for a post-progressive age. One that gets beyond the cultural left worldview that has dominated western intellectual life for the past 60 years.
3/ The Manifesto springs from a conference held at @UniOfBuckingham in June, and signatories all spoke there (nearly all those in the picture signed)
1/ We are entering a post-progressive era. The cultural left-liberalism which emerged a century ago and took off in the late 1960s is exhausted. This ‘vibe shift’doesn’t just repudiate the last decade, but the last 60 years. My latest @WSJ
2/ Ideas are often downstream of events, rather than the reverse. The origins of postmodernism and critical theory lie in decolonization, Civil Rights and the ‘new social movements’ of minorities, feminists and gays.
3/ As with postmodernism, events spurred post-progressivism: the illiberalism and irrationality of cancel culture & transactivism, endemic populism and polarization, family and community breakdown (including birthrate collapse)
1/ Trump's power trip is weakening national populism worldwide. Why?
2/ Right populism is essentially CULTURAL nationalism: a desire to defend national traditions against left-liberal extremism (i.e. on immigration, history, the sex binary, or censorship)
3/ Trump, after promising cultural nationalist actions on DEI & immigration, has pivoted to POLITICAL nationalism: breast-beating aggression toward allies like Canada and Europe, imposing tariffs, disrespecting Ukrainian heroism
1/ Authors of a pro-DEI paper published in Nature and reported in Science made critical errors which nullify their findings. Not only did they bury inconvenient findings, they reported junk results.
2/ First, they found that Black and Hispanic scholars have far fewer cited published works than White and Asian scholars but did not report this.
3/ Women are also less productive than men. What we see is that the race gap is found mainly among men (decline slope of blue line), with little difference between races among female scholars (flat red line). This model controls for discipline and years in academia.
1/ Woke won’t fade away because it is rooted in left-liberalism, the basis of modern western culture.
A thread on my new book Taboo (The Third Awokening in North America), released today:
2/ Woke is a useful analytical concept that describes a distinct phenomenon in the world: the making sacred of historically marginalized race, gender and sexual minority groups. Woke people are emotionally attached to minorities and cold toward majorities.
3/ Despite firms cutting back on DEI and less talk of ‘white privilege’ in the media, woke cultural socialism is not going away. Why? Because young people are a lot more woke. In 20 years they will be the median voter. Generational turnover will mainstream woke.