Ronald Witteles Profile picture
Nov 11 16 tweets 4 min read Read on X
(1/14) 🚨I had the privilege of providing commentary on the Phase 2 #coramitug trial at #AHA25. The headline was that patients who received high-dose (60 mg/kg) coramitug had significant reductions in NT-proBNP at 1 year compared with placebo. So it’s an unequivocal win, right? The full story is a bit more complicated…🤔
(2/14) For background, coramitug (previously known as NI006 and ALXN2220) is a monoclonal antibody designed to remove amyloid deposits from tissue. This is an attractive concept, as it offers hope for true reversal of disease. Is this the holy grail of amyloidosis treatments? Image
(3/14) The reality is that the story of antibody trials in #amyloidosis is a mixed bag… and that’s being generous. Let’s take a quick walk down memory lane... 🧠
(4/14) Dezamizumab was an anti-SAP antibody. (SAP is present in all amyloid deposits). Not only did the trial not show any hint of efficacy, but it was stopped after 7 patients enrolled due to 2 cases of new vasculitis. 😱
(5/14) Birtamimab was an antibody targeting AL amyloid deposits, and was trialed with much hope in 260 patients in the VITAL trial. The results? No hint of benefit in either all cause mortality or cardiac hospitalization. Image
(6/14): A post-hoc analysis in the most advanced (Mayo Stage 4) patients seemed to show a mortality benefit with birtamimab in VITAL. But keep in mind – the choice of endpoint, the Mayo Stage, and the timing of the assessment was all made post-hoc. Danger, Will Robinson! Image
(7/14) This post-hoc data led to another Phase 3 trial of birtamimab, this time only in Mayo Stage 4 patients. The results were announced in May 2025: No hint of benefit in the primary endpoint or either secondary endpoint. The company has since continued the birtamimab program.😢
(8/14) Another antibody, anselamimab, was tested in advanced AL amyloidosis patients, in the CARES trial. The results? Another disappointment. The company announced in July 2025 that the trial failed to meet its primary endpoint.😢 (They also noted a benefit in a “prespecified subgroup of patients”, but no further details so far.)
(9/14) The Phase 1 ATTR amyloid trial with cliramitug (formerly NI 006 – not to be confused with coramitug!) was published 2 years ago. In 40 patients treated with cliramitug or placebo, there were encouraging trends in imaging and biomarkers, rightly leading to the ongoing Phase 3 trial DepleTTR-CM. Nothing definitive here, but finally some good news!Image
Image
(10/14): So what about the new data presented with coramitug at #AHA25? The positives were the NTBNP data shown above, and some seeming improvements in exploratory echo parameters. But there were some real negatives as well…
(11/14): The other primary endpoint, 6-minute walk distance, didn’t show any significant difference vs. placebo (P=0.54). None of the secondary endpoints were positive, including GLS by echo or ECV by MRI.
(12/14): If you’re a glass-half-empty kind of person, consider this: There were 7 prespecified primary and secondary efficacy endpoints, and only a single one (NTBNP in the 60 mg/kg group) was positive.👀😲
(13/14): One other note of caution: a potential imbalance in arrhythmias. This is scientifically plausible & was seen in 43% of high-dose coramitug patients compared with 23% of placebo patients. Not definitively a problem, but not reassuring either. Image
(14/14) I leave you with my take-home slide from #AHA25. There are some reasons for optimism with coramitug and the ATTR antibody depleters – but this is hardly an unequivocal win or the “holy grail”. Let’s see what we learn with time – and more data. Image
@KMAlexanderMD @Paul_P_Cheng @MarthaGrogan1 @MasriAhmadMD @BrettSperryMD @MargotDavisMD @maz_hanna @DorbalaSharmila @MGKhouri_md @JLGrodin @JLRosenthal @SumeetMitter @UreyTony @LilySternMD @frederickruberg @sarahcud @MKIttlesonMD
@KMAlexanderMD @Paul_P_Cheng @MarthaGrogan1 @MasriAhmadMD @BrettSperryMD @MargotDavisMD @maz_hanna @DorbalaSharmila @MGKhouri_md @JLGrodin @JLRosenthal @SumeetMitter @UreyTony @LilySternMD @frederickruberg @sarahcud @MKIttlesonMD One small edit to 2/14: Coramitug is the former NNC6019 & PRX004. Cliramitug is the former NI006, as noted in 9/13. Why do the names have to be so similar???😠

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ronald Witteles

Ronald Witteles Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Ron_Witteles

Jun 24, 2024
🚨🚨🚨 MAJOR news in the #amyloidosis world this morning with positive topline results of #HELIOS-B. #Vutrisiran met all primary & secondary endpoints. Let's break down what we know... #StanfordAmyloidCenter (1/13) Image
There were 2 primary endpoints -- composite of all-cause mortality & recurrent CV events in the whole population (n=654) and in the tafamidis-naive population (n=395). Both were positive! 🍾Overall pop = HR 0.718 (p=0.0118), tafamidis-naive = HR 0.672 (p=0.0162). (2/13)
We know that #vutrisiran hit ALL secondary endpoints in both groups. Those include change in KCCQ, NYHA, 6MWD... and all-cause mortality! Quite impressive that all were hit in not only the tafamidis-naive population but overall pop as well. (3/13)
Read 14 tweets
Dec 19, 2020
1/ Thoughts/reflections on the events of the last 24 hours with the vaccine rollout at Stanford... One of the most upsetting 24 hours I have ever experienced.
2/ The rollout was an absolute mess. Pledges that were made were not followed through on. Housestaff were rightly upset to (for all practical purposes) be completely left out of the first wave. They are our very definition of frontline physicians.
3/ There will need to be a deep dive into how exactly this happened. I am at least happy to say that I have learned enough over the course of the day to know that this was not malice or a specific intent to exclude the housestaff. (cont.)
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(