bruh Profile picture
Nov 11 6 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Found an article which goes through the entire session

1. Background :

ADOR is suing Dolphin Kidnapping Group (director Shin Woo-seok’s company) for 1.1 billion won in damages. The issue began when Shin uploaded a NewJeans video which ADOR owns to his own YouTube channel instead of HYBE/ADOR’s official channel. After ADOR questioned him, Shin deleted all NewJeans videos from another unofficial fan channel he ran (“Ban Hee-soo”), and fans became angry at ADOR.

ADOR says the ETA director’s cut should have been uploaded to HYBE’s official channel, which has 78.7 million subscribers. Instead, Shin uploaded it to his own channel with only 480,000 subscribers. ADOR claims this caused financial loss to HYBE and ADOR and gave benefits to Dolphin Kidnapping Group. ADOR also says Shin released the video without permission and damaged ADOR’s reputation.

2.Mhj appeared as a witness for shin’s side

Min Hee-jin appeared in court as a witness, on behalf of Dolphin Kidnapping Group. This was her first time appearing in a lawsuit unrelated to her own stock dispute.

Min testified that in the industry, it is normal for music video directors to upload completed projects to their own social media or websites, not just the company’s channels. She said written contracts are unusual and that most agreements are verbal. According to her, doing everything in writing would create too much paperwork.

Min stated that the upload was verbally agreed upon in a meeting with five people, including Thor, the Vice President of Creative at Apple. She said she had the authority to approve the upload because she was the CEO and producer. Min said it would make no sense for her to ask Apple for permission when ADOR owns the copyright.Image
Image
Image
3.why she picked that clown Shin and the approval to upload on his site

Min said Shin is not originally a music video director. She said when she doesn’t use industry-standard directors, she usually ends up tired and stressed, so she normally avoids that. But she explained that Shin believes the structure and production approach of music videos should change to become creative. According to Min, Shin didn’t even want to shoot the video, but she wanted to create meaningful work and believed in his creativity. She said she wanted to use his “sense,” and although the word “trust” felt strange to her, she wanted to use his instincts and let him express his creativity.

Regarding the upload itself, she said the approval was of course verbal. She repeated that the copyright belongs to ADOR, and since she was CEO and producer at the time, she had the authority to approve it. She said it would be strange for her to ask Apple for permission.

When ADOR claimed, “Wouldn’t that decrease YouTube revenue?”,
Min replied, “That’s a foolish and absurd argument.”

She clarified that from her perspective, that’s how ridiculous the claim sounds. She argued that uploading to Dolphin Kidnapping Group’s channel benefits ADOR because it exposes the video to a wider audience not just fans who follow idol content.

Min said after she was removed from ADOR, she received an email about this from ADOR. She said Kim Ye-min, her manager , reported the email to her but she didn’t reply. She said that Lee Do-kyung kept asking whether they had discussed the matter, and Min and her team wondered why HYBE was nitpicking again, because they already felt HYBE was trying to harass her with various tactics. She also said she found it strange that they even asked. Regarding the email’s content, she said “I’m not an important person, and I don’t remember.”Image
4. Mhj vs shin vs Ador back and forth on the video upload

When asked about Shin taking down the video later, Min sighed and said she thought ADOR’s behavior was unreasonable. She said ADOR wrote a contract on their own and then claimed damages when they said a part of it was violated. She called this abusing the law and added that there are “legal tricksters” who do things like this even when there is no actual damage or victim.

ADOR then questioned Min about Shin posting a message on SNS saying, “It must be a tough time, stay strong.” Min said HYBE was imagining things and that she never asked Shin to upload it. When ADOR asked whether this was part of building negative public opinion against HYBE, Min said this trial was not about that issue and refused to answer.

+Image
+

Regarding the teaser of the director’s cut posted by Shin, Min said she approved it. She said they had discussed this even before the official meeting, during filming. She explained they never know how many pieces of content will be made until after shooting. She said if there are 10 usable clips, they release 10, and if there’s only one, they release one. She said this cannot be done with written paperwork.

ADOR asked if Min gave Shin permission to upload a video that belonged to Apple. Min answered "I mentioned this plan during the verbal agreement, so it was agreed upon at that time." The court also pointed out, "If you remember, answer as you remember. If you don't know, say you don't know, and there's no need to speculate."

So regarding shin guys post “coming soon” teaser, Min said she didn’t need to approve it, it was already agreed verbally. She said they don’t post things randomly and always post at the right timing. She said having Apple VP Thor in the meeting is “objective evidence.”Image
5. They asked Mhj if she was funnelling money to shin so he could hit his profit mark

When asked why she handled an exclusive contract verbally, Min said all staff run things verbally and wondered why only Shin is being singled out. ADOR then stated that ADOR paid Dolphin Kidnapping Group about 3.3 billion KRW, which is 25% of their annual revenue. ADOR also presented a separate agreement stating Dolphin Kidnapping Group must reach 18 billion KRW profit by 2026 and questioned whether Min funneled work to help them reach that number.

Min became angry and said ADOR didn’t understand contracts. She said if Shin was being favored, his labor costs would have been higher, and that accusing her of funneling work is a false accusation.

ADOR then asked if she knew about the contents of the shareholder agreement. Min first said she didn’t know. When asked if she received the document from Shin, she admitted she did. She said she didn’t review it and simply forwarded it, and that the vice president probably reviewed it instead. She added that the person who asked her the question didn’t understand field-level work because they were not directly involved in the project.

When ADOR suggested she gave up revenue by uploading to Dolphin Kidnapping Group, Min said that channel doesn’t earn money and she pursued intangible creative value that she considers higher than what ADOR was talking about. When ADOR pointed out that NewJeans’ SNS has 380,000 followers while Dolphin Kidnapping Group has 180,000, Min said each creator has different value. She said Shin is a “star,” and follower numbers don’t reflect influence.

ADOR asked why she didn’t upload to HYBE’s massive 78.7M channel but instead uploaded to Dolphin’s smaller channel. Min said:

“That was my intention. It’s more fun that way.Uploading on HYBE is boring.
My content goes viral because I do unexpected things.”

She said Dolphin Kidnapping Group did not receive special benefits because the channel was not monetized.Image
Image
When the judge asked her if directors normally upload music videos themselves, Min said they usually do so for portfolio reasons, though she doesn’t remember specific cases. She said the shins director’s cut caused huge buzz inside ADOR and people were curious about the ending and whether it would lead to a unique promotion. She said she doesn’t understand why ADOR is nitpicking this.

The next hearing will be held on December 9.
I got a headache with this anyways will upload if I read something I missed out

m.tvdaily.co.kr/article.php?ai…Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with bruh

bruh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bruh8842

Nov 13
Dispatch wrote a article for Mhj and her minions, will be a long ass one

Do You Understand Now?"...News, 567 Days of Revolutionary Diary

There are six New Jeans !

Their own "revolution" is over. New Jeans has thrown in the towel after 567 days. Hae-rin and Hye- in announced their return to "Adore," and three hours later, Minzy , Hani , and Daniel (unavoidably) announced their participation.

Ultimately, the 567 days of fighting left only scars for everyone. They left behind only quotes like, "There are too many dog guys," "Why do I have to be ignored?", "Do you understand?", and "Are you telling a victim of school violence to go back to school?"

We looked back at the major events over the past year and seven months, from New Jeans' notice of termination to the notice of reinstatement.

1. “There are so many creepy old men, those fers” (2024.4.25)*

Min Hee-jin held an emergency press conference. For about two hours, she criticized HYBE with curses and tears. She said she was subjected to an unfair audit because she internally reported HYBE’s problems.

That day, Min said, “These creepy old men are trying to kill me,” and “You can’t do this job without cursing. There are too many f***ers,” publicly criticizing HYBE executives.

Regarding the accusation of attempting to seize management control, she insisted it was just “casual talk.” Instead, she claimed HYBE betrayed her, saying, “They sucked me dry and then tried to crush me.”

HYBE countered, “There are records in the chat logs showing the same goal (takeover) pursued for months. This is not simple ‘casual talk.’ There is evidence of ‘planning’ and ‘execution.’”
2. “Please give us back CEO Min” (2024.9.11)

NewJeans turned on a YouTube Live. They demanded that Min Hee-jin be reinstated as CEO.

Hyein said, “After the CEO was removed, it was painful seeing the people we worked with suffer from unfair demands and pressure.”

Danielle said, “We were only working hard for our dreams — what did we do wrong? This company just looks inhumane. Please stop tormenting our CEO Min from a human standpoint.”

Minji said, “Unnecessary and exhausting things keep happening to NewJeans,” and emphasized, “What we want is the original ADOR where CEO Min oversees both management and producing.”

However, this live broadcast appears to have been pre-planned. Min used the artists as her speakers. At the time, Dispatch obtained KakaoTalk messages showing Min sharing the livestream schedule with members’ families.Image
3. “Why do I have to go through this?” (2024.10.15)

Hanni mentioned the “ignore her” incident during a YouTube Live. “In the hallway on HYBE’s 4th floor, I passed other team members and a manager. The manager said, loud enough for me to hear, ‘Ignore her.’”

She even appeared at the National Assembly audit the first K-pop singer ever as a witness for the Environment & Labor Committee. She grabbed the mic as a living “victim” of workplace bullying(?).

Hanni cried, saying, “I greeted the members first, and when they came back out, the manager told them, ‘Pretend you didn’t see her, ignore her.’ I don’t understand why I have to experience this.”

But it turned out “ignore her” was not Hanni’s own wording. The court ruled: “The phrase ‘ignore her’ was first used by Min Hee-jin. The memory and expression may have been distorted after conversations with Min. Min reconstructed the events.”Image
Read 11 tweets
Nov 7
Another article which goes through each sides argument , kinda condensed since it was toooo long to paste

Source side

1. “Min did NOT cast NewJeans. Source Music did.”

Source Music says Min claimed:“I found the NewJeans members. I cast them. I branded them.”

They explain how each member was recruited by source and not Mhj
•Minji cast by Source Music before Min even joined HYBE.
•Haerin street-cast in Anyang. In the contract video, Haerin’s mom says it’s surprising they came to Anyang.
•Hyein Source Music’s CEO personally convinced the parents.
•Danielle moved when a Source staff member changed companies; Source Music cast her.
•Hanni selected through HYBE + Source’s global audition in 16 countries. Min never appeared as a judge.

2. “The members did NOT join believing they were HYBE’s first girl group.”

Source Music states that Min claims the members joined thinking they would be HYBE’s first girl group, but video evidence shows otherwise. Danielle’s mother repeatedly asks for a guarantee that if debut plans fall apart, Danielle would be allowed to choose whether to stay or leave the company. Hyein’s mother asked similar questions. Source Music explains that if the families were promised a guaranteed “first debut,” they would not have asked for backup plans. They also emphasize that in the entertainment industry, promising trainees that they will debut first before any final lineup is unrealistic and impossible, and Min knows this because she has worked in the industry for years.
3. “Min delayed work and tried to take the team to her own label.”

Source Music says they originally planned:
•NewJeans to debut in September 2021.
•Source Music = project owner
•Mhj = branding
•Bang Si-hyuk / HYBE = music production

But the schedule got delayed 10 months. Internal reports state that Min repeatedly failed to meet schedules, refused collaboration, and pushed to expand her control. KakaoTalk messages show the Source Music CEO constantly trying to chase Min for progress, while Min replies that organizing her personal label is her priority and that she wants NewJeans transferred to her label

Source Music also claims Min was in constant contact with a shaman, who advised her to take the entire group. Messages show Min saying she wanted the team for herself and was willing to break the project if she couldn’t get them. Source Music concludes that Min wanted to take NewJeans not for artistic reasons but to launch her own label with them as her first group.
From the article
At the time, the plaintiff could not understand why the defendant was acting this way. Only later after seeing her KakaoTalk conversations with a shaman did they understand. In the messages, Min says, ‘I won’t debut the girl group under Source. I’ll put my label name in the credits.’ In another message, she says, ‘I will complete planning for my label in April and push Source without yielding.’ The shaman suggests: ‘Tell So Seong-jin to make another girl group,’ implying that Min should take the entire team that later became NewJeans.”

Source Music still attempted to debut N-Team in 2021 and S-Team in Q1 2022. But the defendant continued demanding the transfer of N-Team. Internal reports show concerns that if coordination with Min failed, S-Team would have to debut first. In Slack messages, former HYBE CEO Park Ji-won reported to Bang Si-hyuk that Min said, ‘I don’t care when S-Team debuts; I just want N-Team transferred to M Label as the first team.’ In shaman messages, Min even says, ‘The protagonist appears last,’ meaning she wanted NewJeans to debut after LE SSERAFIM. Thus, the transfer and debut order were the exact opposite of what Min claimed
4. Source Music never ‘neglected’ NewJeans.”

Min said the girls were abandoned when managed by Source Music.

Source Music says this is completely false:
•They supported the members until the day they were transferred to ADOR.
•They even gave them a huge opportunity appearing in a BTS music video just two months before transfer.

According to Source Music, this is an incredibly rare and valuable opportunity for trainees, proving that they invested in the girls’ future. They argue that Min only portrayed them as negligent to justify why she needed to take the group to her new label.

5. “Parents complained and Min used the members for her own benefit.”

Source Music says that Min told parents the debut delay happened because she created a label specifically for NewJeans. Parents sent complaint emails and petitions because they believed Min’s explanation. But Source Music says the delay actually occurred because Min refused to collaborate.
From the article:
“Parents’ protest emails and petitions show that the defendant led the parents to believe that the delay was because she created a label just for NewJeans. But objective evidence shows that the delay was caused by the defendant’s refusal to cooperate.”

“If the defendant truly respected the NewJeans members, this situation would not exist. The defendant even demeaned ,NewJeans to an almost insulting degree, she even said
“It’s exhausting and horrible to take care of kids who are desperate to become famous celebrities without thinking.” yet she used them as justification for her public-opinion battle.”

And they even pointed to the Ador vs new jeans case where
Even the judge in the NewJeans exclusive contract injunction noted, ‘There is no evidence that the defendant was directly involved in the selection process of NewJeans members,’ and accepted the injunction. The main trial recently reached the same conclusion.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(