Skyrim was released as one of the definitive RPGs 14 years to this day. Who you decided to back in the Skyrim civil war shows where your political instincts lie. Here is why the Stormcloaks were in the right, and how Ulfric would Make Skyrim Great Again. A 🧵
To layout the background, the White Gold Concordant of the Great War is integral to understand. The Empire and the High Elves fought a war in which the Empire lost, and in the concordant banned the worship of Talos. Talos was the first Emperor of Tamriel, who ascended to godhood, and whom the elves hated.
In their victory they banned all worship of him as a god. The Empire, in their weakness, capitulated and agreed 26 years prior to the start of Skyrim. It is in this war that Ulfric Stormcloak was forged to be the ruler of Skyrim.
Ulfric had trained to be a monk with the grey beards, learning their magic of the Thuum, but when the Great War broke out he felt compelled to fight to preserve the Empire. During the course of this he lost friends, lost battles, till eventually he was captured by the Elves, and the Empire defeated. He was tortured and broken by them, but eventually released.
The most controversial aspect is that the Thalmor created a dossier on him which claims that Ulfric is a Thalmor asset. However, the context is not that he is controlled by them. Rather, it lays out specifically that Ulfric in so far as he causes disruption to Skyrim is beneficial, but that a Stormcloak victory would not be in Thalmor interests. From there, Ulfric leaves and goes to Markarth, a province under siege in Skyrim.
Markarth was captured by the Reachmen, nature worshipping Bretons who took over the city in the midst of the Great War. Ulfric raised a militia and made a deal with both the Empire and the local Nord rulers of Markarth that should he be successful, that Talos worship would once more be legal.
Ulfric won, freed the city, at the cost of blood. However, the Empire rescinded on their agreement, and arrested Ulfric. One of the most common arguments against the Stormcloaks is that the Empire is necessary to ultimately defeat the Thalmor.
However, they showed time and time again, most particularly here that they are cowards who would sign away piety to hold a weakened throne, would allow the Thalmor to march through the land on witch hunts against Thalmor worship, and while they would hold strongly to a deal with elves, would betray the Nordic people in a heartbeat under the slightest pressure.
While once more imprisoned, this time at the hands of the Empire he fought and bled for twice over, Ulfrics father Hoag would die. Ulfric was only able to deliver his eulogy via a smuggled letter from prison. Upon his return to Windhelm, Ulfric was elected Jarl.
Some years after holding this position, Ulfric would challenge Torygg to a duel for the status of High King of Skyrim, in accordance with Skyrims traditions. The only consequence to Torygg would be the trigger of an election to high king upon declining, which Ulfric would likely win, just as he would the duel. Torygg accepts the duel, and is swiftly killed by Ulfric using his Thuum, the power of the shout.
Legally, Ulfric did absolutely nothing wrong and nothing says that he could not use what power he had in fighting to the death. However, the officials of Solitude ignore all tradition and law and attempt to arrest Ulfric for murder. He is forced to flee back to Windhelm, where the civil war then truly begins.
Those who take issue with Ulfric wielding what power he has as “unfair” show here most plainly how they fail to understand what is at hand. Why, in a fight to the death, does it not make sense to use all tools at your disposal for victory?
In defending this idea, they then throw out all validity of the legal tradition itself, and attempt to completely invalidate it by executing Ulfric for a legally justified act, all to keep Skyrim weak and curtailed under the heel of the Empire which itself is under the heel of the Thalmor.
The Stormcloak rebellion rages for several years, until we get to the start of the game. You, the character, have been caught in the wrong place at the wrong time alongside Ulfric and several Stormcloaks, and are about to be summarily executed without a trial.
The Stormcloaks attempt to comfort you, even though they know the truth of the matter which is that you are not one of them. The imperials are ready to simply chop your head off, when the arrival of a dragon interrupts everything and allows an escape, where you are assisted primarily by a Stormcloak who tries to keep you alive even though you are not one of them.
On a personal level, how can you possibly take the side whom with your only interaction is that they will kill you for absolutely nothing?
You as the player get to choose a side in the civil war, and whoever you pick will ultimately be the winner. The Stormcloaks are Nordic Nationalists who believe Skyrim is for the Nords. One of their beliefs is they are sick of seeing dark elf and Khajiit immigration.
This is often objected to as being racist, but the people that are coming in are not their best. They are sending people that have lots of problems, and they bring those problems to Skyrim. They bring drugs. They bring crime. They’re rapists. Some, I assume, are good people. But a handful of good ones is no excuse to allow the Nords to be demographically replaced in their own nation.
Once more, the Stormcloaks are also religiously pious. They seek to worship the god Talos, the first emperor who became ascendant. The Empire would rather ban and enforce that ban against worship to appease the Thalmor. It might be said that rebelling against the Empire that Talos created is a betrayal of Talos, but the empire that betrayed him first is unworthy of that man. Thus, the Stormcloaks are in the right here as well.
Another objection raised is that Skyrim cannot stand alone against the Thalmor. Anyone who says this fails utterly at basic geo politics. The elves are based out of the Summerset Isles. The most damning is that Hammerfell already fought and won a war against them for independence, thus cutting off that route.
High Rock is an imperial province, but an independent Skyrim would allow it to become independent or subjugated by Skyrim. The only way the Thalmor could invade in the first place is with Imperial assistance in Cyrodil, which if they were willing to do that, shows these people would simply never oppose the Aldmeri to begin with. Skyrim can hold alone.
With all of this in mind, even as a child playing this game I intrinsically knew the Stormcloaks were right. They fight for a free Skyrim. They fight for a hero of their people, Ulfric, who proved himself with his willingness to put himself on the front line time and time again. Skyrim is for the Nords. Make Skyrim Great Again.
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Declaration of Independence can often be a common target on this side of right wing politics, but largely it is as misunderstood by the dissidents as it is by the moderates. It is best understood as a Nationalist document. A 🧵
The most common phrase attacked by dissidents and misunderstood by everyone else is “All men are created equal.” But this is language asserting what was established in the Virginia Charter of 1609, which was that the descendants of the colonists will hold the same rights they would’ve held if born in England.
“Also we do for Us, our Heirs and Successors, DECLARE by these Presents, that all and every the Persons being our Subjects, which shall go and inhabit within the said Colony and Plantation, and every their Children and Posterity, which shall happen to be born within any of the Limits thereof, shall HAVE and ENJOY all Liberties, Franchizes, and Immunities of Free Denizens and natural Subjects within any of our other Dominions to all Intents and Purposes, as if they had been abiding and born within this our Realm of England, or in any other of our Dominions.” - Second Charter of Virginia, 1609
Thomas Jefferson cannot be blamed for how language written over 200 years ago would be twisted by subversives and misunderstood by conservative readers generations past. He meant what he said when he wrote it. He meant that an Anglo Saxon man born in America was by right to be treated the same as if born in England. There are more yet pieces within the Declaration of Independence though that often get overlooked which show their thinking, even in the opening lines.
James Lindsay and his plot to control the future of the post-Trump American right by becoming the next Bill Buckley through gatekeeping them from mainstream discourse by labeling them as Woke Right, a thread 🧵 (1/19)
James Lindsay has made a tweet with the words “Woke Right” nearly every single day for at least the past 8 months since roughly around the time of the election of Donald Trump. He has been noted and ridiculed by many for doing so, but the question that stands is why is he doing it?
Theories that have been proposed include:
1. He is a grifter and is in it for money.
I find this to be completely untrue. Lindsay has lost potential money and support in his crusade and dedicates an absurd amount of his time and energy to this fight. He is smart enough to know that this isn’t benefiting him financially at this moment, and he could’ve easily rescinded and retracted and been accepted back if he simply stopped and apologized for it. He even acknowledges as much himself. (Pic1) This is what someone who is a grifter would’ve done. This leads to the second proposed theory.
2. He is just unhinged and crashing out.
While this is true to an extent, with him doing things such as labeling this random Turkish guy named Furkan Gozukara who loves Zohran Mamdani alongside accusing many random tiny follower count anons to include myself as a member of the Woke Right, it doesn’t paint the full picture. Almost certainly, there are deeper motives to why he is doing this and Lindsay himself has outlined it in many of his articles. This leads me to question, what is his actual motive? (2/19)
What I believe James is doing is seeking to establish himself as the number 1 thought leader of the American right, a role he believes he should hold (pic1), and the ultimate gatekeeper of the right wing. I also believe he is taking much of his play book for this from Bill Buckley. But who is Bill Buckley?
Bill Buckley was the founder of the National Review in the 1950s. In the 50s and 60s, there was a wide diversity of right wing thought in the discourse much as there is today. Notable examples include the previously established Old Right, the John Birch Society, Ayn Rand Objectivists, and the American Nazi Party headed by George Lincoln Rockwell, a former associate of National Review. Buckley worked heavily to gatekeep and control the direction of the right wing at this era, excising all of them from the discourse. He worked to ally the more moderate social conservatives who were in favor of the civil rights act alongside neoconservatives to form the new right which would dominate the right wing sphere up until the rise of MAGA and Trump. James Lindsay is an open endorser of Buckley and the actions he took (pic2). But why does this actually matter? (3/19)