Dispatch wrote a article for Mhj and her minions, will be a long ass one
Do You Understand Now?"...News, 567 Days of Revolutionary Diary
There are six New Jeans !
Their own "revolution" is over. New Jeans has thrown in the towel after 567 days. Hae-rin and Hye- in announced their return to "Adore," and three hours later, Minzy , Hani , and Daniel (unavoidably) announced their participation.
Ultimately, the 567 days of fighting left only scars for everyone. They left behind only quotes like, "There are too many dog guys," "Why do I have to be ignored?", "Do you understand?", and "Are you telling a victim of school violence to go back to school?"
We looked back at the major events over the past year and seven months, from New Jeans' notice of termination to the notice of reinstatement.
1. “There are so many creepy old men, those fers” (2024.4.25)*
Min Hee-jin held an emergency press conference. For about two hours, she criticized HYBE with curses and tears. She said she was subjected to an unfair audit because she internally reported HYBE’s problems.
That day, Min said, “These creepy old men are trying to kill me,” and “You can’t do this job without cursing. There are too many f***ers,” publicly criticizing HYBE executives.
Regarding the accusation of attempting to seize management control, she insisted it was just “casual talk.” Instead, she claimed HYBE betrayed her, saying, “They sucked me dry and then tried to crush me.”
HYBE countered, “There are records in the chat logs showing the same goal (takeover) pursued for months. This is not simple ‘casual talk.’ There is evidence of ‘planning’ and ‘execution.’”
2. “Please give us back CEO Min” (2024.9.11)
NewJeans turned on a YouTube Live. They demanded that Min Hee-jin be reinstated as CEO.
Hyein said, “After the CEO was removed, it was painful seeing the people we worked with suffer from unfair demands and pressure.”
Danielle said, “We were only working hard for our dreams — what did we do wrong? This company just looks inhumane. Please stop tormenting our CEO Min from a human standpoint.”
Minji said, “Unnecessary and exhausting things keep happening to NewJeans,” and emphasized, “What we want is the original ADOR where CEO Min oversees both management and producing.”
However, this live broadcast appears to have been pre-planned. Min used the artists as her speakers. At the time, Dispatch obtained KakaoTalk messages showing Min sharing the livestream schedule with members’ families.
3. “Why do I have to go through this?” (2024.10.15)
Hanni mentioned the “ignore her” incident during a YouTube Live. “In the hallway on HYBE’s 4th floor, I passed other team members and a manager. The manager said, loud enough for me to hear, ‘Ignore her.’”
She even appeared at the National Assembly audit the first K-pop singer ever as a witness for the Environment & Labor Committee. She grabbed the mic as a living “victim” of workplace bullying(?).
Hanni cried, saying, “I greeted the members first, and when they came back out, the manager told them, ‘Pretend you didn’t see her, ignore her.’ I don’t understand why I have to experience this.”
But it turned out “ignore her” was not Hanni’s own wording. The court ruled: “The phrase ‘ignore her’ was first used by Min Hee-jin. The memory and expression may have been distorted after conversations with Min. Min reconstructed the events.”
4. “One person’s malice truly bad” (2024.11.20)
ADOR’s board dismissed Min as CEO on August 27, 2024. However, she remained an inside director. She was also allowed to continue producing for NewJeans.
But it didn’t last. Min only wanted the CEO position. On November 20, she resigned. She said, “I will hold HYBE legally accountable for violating the shareholder agreement.”
“HYBE will not admit wrongdoing, and shows no sign of changing. They framed me as someone trying to ‘seize management’ and conducted a witch-hunt, even though I worked tirelessly to protect NewJeans.”
Min ended by mocking Bang Si-hyuk’s earlier statement: “Actions driven by one person’s malice should never damage the essence of this industry. It was truly bad.”
5. “Do you understand now?” (2024.11.28)
After Min’s situation, NewJeans held an emergency press conference. They notified ADOR that they would terminate their exclusive contract at midnight on the 29th due to ADOR’s breach of duty. It was an unprecedented declaration requesting cancellation without a lawsuit despite the contract.
Hanni said, “The reason we are leaving ADOR is simple. ADOR has neither the will nor the ability to protect NewJeans. It’s a waste of time and the mental suffering will continue.”
They again emphasized wanting to work with CEO Min.
Reporters pointed out the lack of legal basis for termination. Minji responded, “HYBE and ADOR violated the contract, which is why we are terminating it. Do you understand now?”
They also declared they would not pay a penalty. Haerin said, “We never violated our exclusive contract. We are doing our best even now. There is no reason for us to pay a penalty. ADOR and HYBE should take responsibility.”
6. “Expect a surprising journey” (2025.2.7)
NewJeans began independent activity despite ADOR’s opposition. They even changed the group name without permission — deciding to promote as “NJZ.”
They asked fans on social media to suggest new name ideas.
They said, “Please look forward to a surprising journey with NJZ in 2025,” and uploaded new pictures. Accounts run by NewJeans’ parents also changed their names to “njz_pr.”
NJZ even announced a comeback(?) stage. Minji said, “We will go on stage as NJZ. We cannot wait to show the new music we’ve wanted to share.”
7. “NewJeans cannot do independent activities” (2025.3.21)
The court ruled NewJeans cannot act independently as NJZ.
The Seoul Central District Court Civil Division 50 granted ADOR’s injunction request prohibiting NewJeans from entering contracts or activities without ADOR.
The court said, “Based on NewJeans’ claims and evidence, we cannot conclude that ADOR violated its obligations under the exclusive contract or that trust has irreparably broken.”
NewJeans filed an objection, but the ruling did not change. “Even with the points emphasized in the objection, the injunction decision remains valid.”
8. “You are making us into revolutionaries” (2025.3.22)
NewJeans expressed their feelings about the injunction through TIME magazine.
“We are disappointed in the court’s judgment,” they said. “We do not expect the K-pop industry to change overnight.”
They continued, “Compared to everything we’ve experienced, this is just another step. Maybe this is simply the reality of Korea which is why change and growth are needed.”
They added, “It feels like Korea is trying to make us revolutionaries. Agencies see artists as products rather than real humans. They do not understand how serious this problem is.”
Despite the ruling, they insisted on independent activity.
Haerin said, “As NJZ, we can show greater creative freedom and new goals. We are preparing charming music and impactful performances.”
9. “Our belief will not change” (2025.3.23)
Despite the court ruling, NewJeans attended an event in Hong Kong. They also released a new song, “Pit Stop.”
They revealed 12 new goods — T-shirts, hats, bags, key rings, power banks, etc., all with the NJZ name.
On stage, Hanni said, “This might be our last performance. To respect the court ruling, we decided to stop all activities.”
Danielle said, “We had to speak up to protect the values we believe in, and we have no regrets. That belief will never change.”
Hyein added, “Some people may think it would have been better to just endure it, but we do not regret our choice at all.”
10. “Independent activities? 1 billion won per violation” (2025.5.29)
NewJeans continued independent activities despite the injunction.
They performed in Hong Kong as NJZ and released new songs and goods.
ADOR then filed an indirect compulsory enforcement request.
The Seoul Central District Court Civil Division 52 accepted ADOR’s request in May.
It ruled that without ADOR’s consent, NewJeans cannot do entertainment activities.
Until the first-instance trial ends, NewJeans cannot act independently.
The court noted,
“Two days after the injunction, NewJeans performed overseas under a new group name and released a new song. This proves the intention to continue violating obligations.”
Music creation, advertising, and commercial activities were all banned.
If members act independently without prior approval from ADOR, the court ordered an indirect compulsory fine of 1 billion won per violation.
11. “Telling a school bullying victim to return to school” (2025.7.25)
At the 3rd hearing of the “exclusive contract validity confirmation lawsuit,” NewJeans’ legal team “Sejong” used many metaphors.
“A skilled general won victories in war. The king felt burdened because people supported the general. When the general gave honest advice, the king accused him of treason and beheaded him.
After removing the general, the people were left undefended from enemies.”
They compared HYBE and ADOR to school bullying perpetrators, and NewJeans to the victim. “It is like telling a school bullying victim to return to the school where the bully is.”
They added another metaphor:
“Imagine a wife who cannot live with her husband she gets angry just seeing him, feels disgusted even if he brushes against her. Can the court tell such a wife, ‘Stay with him, he still loves you’?”
Regarding Min’s resignation:
“It is like a father who committed domestic violence returning home, kicking out the mother. Even if the children also left, he says, ‘I’ll get you a better mom, so come back.’”
12.“The result of Min’s pre-planned actions” (2025.10.30)
The contract validity lawsuit ended with ADOR’s victory.
The Seoul Central District Court Civil Division 41 (Presiding Judge Jeong Hoe-il) rejected all 10+ claims from NewJeans a complete defeat.
The court ruled,
“The exclusive contract is still valid. ADOR still has the status of NewJeans’ management company.”
Min’s name appeared 104 times during the trial.
The court concluded that the issues originated from Min the non-performance of obligations, the start of the public opinion war, and the “ignore her” misunderstanding.
It judged that Min intended to separate ADOR (with NewJeans) from HYBE.
It also said Min had prepared public-opinion strategies, institutional complaints, and lawsuits in advance.
NewJeans’ claims about “ADOR’s breach of duties” were viewed as results of Min’s pre-work to find elements useful for creating negative public opinion and initiating lawsuits against HYBE.
13.“We respect the court’s ruling” (2025.11.12)
NewJeans was legally confirmed to belong to ADOR.
Haerin and Hyein respected the ruling and returned to ADOR.
Minji, Hanni, and Danielle also expressed a willingness to join.
However, it was again a one-sided announcement.
“We made a careful decision to return to ADOR. One member is in Antarctica, so the message reached late, and since ADOR didn’t reply, we inevitably announced our position.”
But it appears both sides haven’t finished final coordination.
ADOR said, “After confirming the sincerity of Minji, Hanni, and Danielle’s intention to return, we will begin planning full-scale activities.”
14. “NewJeans, I hope you will be happy” (2025.11.13)
If they succeeded, it would be a revolution; since they failed, it is only wounds.
NewJeans’ “spring” ended with everyone hurt.
Conflicts with HYBE and ADOR, coexisting with other groups — these are challenges they must face again.
On the 13th, Min said,
“I cherish the courage it took for them to hold hands again to protect each other. I can start anew anywhere, but NewJeans must be protected as five.”
In the statements from NewJeans or Min, there was no word of “sorry”.
A return with the attitude of “we had no choice” may become even more painful than the 567-day revolution they caused.
Before showing “music made with sincerity,” a “sincere apology” is also needed.
end of the long thread 😭 the picture 🫠 m.entertain.naver.com/home/article/4…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Found an article which goes through the entire session
1. Background :
ADOR is suing Dolphin Kidnapping Group (director Shin Woo-seok’s company) for 1.1 billion won in damages. The issue began when Shin uploaded a NewJeans video which ADOR owns to his own YouTube channel instead of HYBE/ADOR’s official channel. After ADOR questioned him, Shin deleted all NewJeans videos from another unofficial fan channel he ran (“Ban Hee-soo”), and fans became angry at ADOR.
ADOR says the ETA director’s cut should have been uploaded to HYBE’s official channel, which has 78.7 million subscribers. Instead, Shin uploaded it to his own channel with only 480,000 subscribers. ADOR claims this caused financial loss to HYBE and ADOR and gave benefits to Dolphin Kidnapping Group. ADOR also says Shin released the video without permission and damaged ADOR’s reputation.
2.Mhj appeared as a witness for shin’s side
Min Hee-jin appeared in court as a witness, on behalf of Dolphin Kidnapping Group. This was her first time appearing in a lawsuit unrelated to her own stock dispute.
Min testified that in the industry, it is normal for music video directors to upload completed projects to their own social media or websites, not just the company’s channels. She said written contracts are unusual and that most agreements are verbal. According to her, doing everything in writing would create too much paperwork.
Min stated that the upload was verbally agreed upon in a meeting with five people, including Thor, the Vice President of Creative at Apple. She said she had the authority to approve the upload because she was the CEO and producer. Min said it would make no sense for her to ask Apple for permission when ADOR owns the copyright.
3.why she picked that clown Shin and the approval to upload on his site
Min said Shin is not originally a music video director. She said when she doesn’t use industry-standard directors, she usually ends up tired and stressed, so she normally avoids that. But she explained that Shin believes the structure and production approach of music videos should change to become creative. According to Min, Shin didn’t even want to shoot the video, but she wanted to create meaningful work and believed in his creativity. She said she wanted to use his “sense,” and although the word “trust” felt strange to her, she wanted to use his instincts and let him express his creativity.
Regarding the upload itself, she said the approval was of course verbal. She repeated that the copyright belongs to ADOR, and since she was CEO and producer at the time, she had the authority to approve it. She said it would be strange for her to ask Apple for permission.
When ADOR claimed, “Wouldn’t that decrease YouTube revenue?”,
Min replied, “That’s a foolish and absurd argument.”
She clarified that from her perspective, that’s how ridiculous the claim sounds. She argued that uploading to Dolphin Kidnapping Group’s channel benefits ADOR because it exposes the video to a wider audience not just fans who follow idol content.
Min said after she was removed from ADOR, she received an email about this from ADOR. She said Kim Ye-min, her manager , reported the email to her but she didn’t reply. She said that Lee Do-kyung kept asking whether they had discussed the matter, and Min and her team wondered why HYBE was nitpicking again, because they already felt HYBE was trying to harass her with various tactics. She also said she found it strange that they even asked. Regarding the email’s content, she said “I’m not an important person, and I don’t remember.”
4. Mhj vs shin vs Ador back and forth on the video upload
When asked about Shin taking down the video later, Min sighed and said she thought ADOR’s behavior was unreasonable. She said ADOR wrote a contract on their own and then claimed damages when they said a part of it was violated. She called this abusing the law and added that there are “legal tricksters” who do things like this even when there is no actual damage or victim.
ADOR then questioned Min about Shin posting a message on SNS saying, “It must be a tough time, stay strong.” Min said HYBE was imagining things and that she never asked Shin to upload it. When ADOR asked whether this was part of building negative public opinion against HYBE, Min said this trial was not about that issue and refused to answer.
Another article which goes through each sides argument , kinda condensed since it was toooo long to paste
Source side
1. “Min did NOT cast NewJeans. Source Music did.”
Source Music says Min claimed:“I found the NewJeans members. I cast them. I branded them.”
They explain how each member was recruited by source and not Mhj
•Minji cast by Source Music before Min even joined HYBE.
•Haerin street-cast in Anyang. In the contract video, Haerin’s mom says it’s surprising they came to Anyang.
•Hyein Source Music’s CEO personally convinced the parents.
•Danielle moved when a Source staff member changed companies; Source Music cast her.
•Hanni selected through HYBE + Source’s global audition in 16 countries. Min never appeared as a judge.
2. “The members did NOT join believing they were HYBE’s first girl group.”
Source Music states that Min claims the members joined thinking they would be HYBE’s first girl group, but video evidence shows otherwise. Danielle’s mother repeatedly asks for a guarantee that if debut plans fall apart, Danielle would be allowed to choose whether to stay or leave the company. Hyein’s mother asked similar questions. Source Music explains that if the families were promised a guaranteed “first debut,” they would not have asked for backup plans. They also emphasize that in the entertainment industry, promising trainees that they will debut first before any final lineup is unrealistic and impossible, and Min knows this because she has worked in the industry for years.
3. “Min delayed work and tried to take the team to her own label.”
Source Music says they originally planned:
•NewJeans to debut in September 2021.
•Source Music = project owner
•Mhj = branding
•Bang Si-hyuk / HYBE = music production
But the schedule got delayed 10 months. Internal reports state that Min repeatedly failed to meet schedules, refused collaboration, and pushed to expand her control. KakaoTalk messages show the Source Music CEO constantly trying to chase Min for progress, while Min replies that organizing her personal label is her priority and that she wants NewJeans transferred to her label
Source Music also claims Min was in constant contact with a shaman, who advised her to take the entire group. Messages show Min saying she wanted the team for herself and was willing to break the project if she couldn’t get them. Source Music concludes that Min wanted to take NewJeans not for artistic reasons but to launch her own label with them as her first group.
From the article
At the time, the plaintiff could not understand why the defendant was acting this way. Only later after seeing her KakaoTalk conversations with a shaman did they understand. In the messages, Min says, ‘I won’t debut the girl group under Source. I’ll put my label name in the credits.’ In another message, she says, ‘I will complete planning for my label in April and push Source without yielding.’ The shaman suggests: ‘Tell So Seong-jin to make another girl group,’ implying that Min should take the entire team that later became NewJeans.”
Source Music still attempted to debut N-Team in 2021 and S-Team in Q1 2022. But the defendant continued demanding the transfer of N-Team. Internal reports show concerns that if coordination with Min failed, S-Team would have to debut first. In Slack messages, former HYBE CEO Park Ji-won reported to Bang Si-hyuk that Min said, ‘I don’t care when S-Team debuts; I just want N-Team transferred to M Label as the first team.’ In shaman messages, Min even says, ‘The protagonist appears last,’ meaning she wanted NewJeans to debut after LE SSERAFIM. Thus, the transfer and debut order were the exact opposite of what Min claimed
4. Source Music never ‘neglected’ NewJeans.”
Min said the girls were abandoned when managed by Source Music.
Source Music says this is completely false:
•They supported the members until the day they were transferred to ADOR.
•They even gave them a huge opportunity appearing in a BTS music video just two months before transfer.
According to Source Music, this is an incredibly rare and valuable opportunity for trainees, proving that they invested in the girls’ future. They argue that Min only portrayed them as negligent to justify why she needed to take the group to her new label.
5. “Parents complained and Min used the members for her own benefit.”
Source Music says that Min told parents the debut delay happened because she created a label specifically for NewJeans. Parents sent complaint emails and petitions because they believed Min’s explanation. But Source Music says the delay actually occurred because Min refused to collaborate.
From the article:
“Parents’ protest emails and petitions show that the defendant led the parents to believe that the delay was because she created a label just for NewJeans. But objective evidence shows that the delay was caused by the defendant’s refusal to cooperate.”
“If the defendant truly respected the NewJeans members, this situation would not exist. The defendant even demeaned ,NewJeans to an almost insulting degree, she even said
“It’s exhausting and horrible to take care of kids who are desperate to become famous celebrities without thinking.” yet she used them as justification for her public-opinion battle.”
And they even pointed to the Ador vs new jeans case where
Even the judge in the NewJeans exclusive contract injunction noted, ‘There is no evidence that the defendant was directly involved in the selection process of NewJeans members,’ and accepted the injunction. The main trial recently reached the same conclusion.