@JuicyJuuce @morallawwithin @threadreaderapp Let's sum up your arguments:
1) we now know the base reality due to quantum mechanics 2) I'm not sure how quantum mechanics allows us to know base reality
3a) you probably enjoy sharing your philosophy with me
3b) only quantum mechanics is a place where philosophy is useful
@JuicyJuuce @morallawwithin @threadreaderapp 4) you probably think that quantum mechanics both affects and does not affect daily life, you continental philosopher
Citations provided below.
@JuicyJuuce @morallawwithin @threadreaderapp So what are you really arguing? What's your point? How did any of this have any bearing on what I shared? And how do your statements not blatantly contradict themselves?
@JuicyJuuce @morallawwithin @threadreaderapp I think I made the mistake of treating you and your words with respect and taking you seriously. I suspect, beyond all possible means, that I am being "Trolled".
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@morallawwithin You miss that Analytic Philosophy is simply a school of Neo-Kantianism that has been attempting, over a century now, to create a proof against Hegel's concept of The Absolute.
The main thesis of Analytic Philosophy is that existence is divided by nature, and not unified.
@morallawwithin Hence the focus on linguistics, which is, at its core, a method of transcribing divisions between things.
The Analytics had a strong, intuitive, belief that the ability to use language at all implies that language (therefore division) is the base reality of this world.
@morallawwithin Therefore, they use language (which math is a form of) as a tool to prove that language is a tool that can prove things. Yes, it's kind of complicated and circular, but this is the main motivation of early Analytic Philosophy.