Rovshan Aliyev Profile picture
Nov 15 12 tweets 2 min read Read on X
🧵 THREAD: Why Historians Reject Ancient Nations in Europe but Accept Them for Iran & Armenia?
👇
1/
Here’s one of the biggest double standards in modern scholarship:
👉 In Europe: “Nations are modern inventions.”
👉 In Iran & Armenia: “These nations are 3000 years old.”

Why the contradiction? Let’s break it down.
2/
Modern nationalism theory (Anderson, Gellner, Hobsbawm) says:
❌ Nations do not exist in antiquity.
✔️ They emerge in the 18th–20th centuries with schools, print culture, bureaucracy.

So why do Iran and Armenia get treated differently?
3/
Because geography got nationalized.
Terms like:
• “Arm. Highland”
• “Iranian Plateau”
sound neutral, but they’re not.
They imply a primordial homeland and uninterrupted continuity.
Historians never use “German Plateau” or “French Highland.” But for Iran/Arm — no problem.
4/
Area studies inherited Orientalist habits.
Middle Eastern & Caucasus studies grew from philology, not social theory.

So old notions like “ancient Iranian civilization” or “eternal Armenia” survived long after similar myths were rejected in European history.
5/
Textbooks and encyclopedias reinforce the story.
You’ll see phrases like:

• “the immemorial Iranian nation”
• “Armenia as a homeland for three millennia”

These go unchallenged → primordialism becomes “normal.”
6/
Political sensitivity plays a huge role.
Especially regarding the Armenian Genocide & regional conflicts.

Criticizing ancient origin narratives is often misread as political hostility.
So many Western scholars avoid the topic entirely.
7/
But the result is clear:
We get ancient nations in the East
and
modern nations in Europe…

…even though the same theoretical framework should apply everywhere.
8/
A consistent approach would:
• Drop nationalized toponyms
• Use real historical polities (Urartu, Elam, satrapies)
• Treat “nation” as a modern category
• Study origin myths as myths, not as facts

Simple. Coherent. Honest.
9/
Until then, Iran and Armenia will continue to be exceptions in a field that claims to reject primordialism.
And this double standard shapes how entire regions understand their past.
f you want a deeper dive, I’ve written a full breakdown (with references).
DM for the full text or comment “SEND”.

🧵 End.
@ThreadReaderApp, unroll.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rovshan Aliyev

Rovshan Aliyev Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(