The World of Soylent Green Is Closer Than We Admit
There’s a moment in Soylent Green that never leaves you.
An old man — tired, gentle, defeated — walks willingly into a euthanasia chamber. The lights dim, the music swells, and he’s given a “beautiful” ending that hides an unbearable truth: his society decided he was no longer worth the effort it would take to keep him alive.
That is the heartbreak at the centre of the film.
Not the twist.
Not the dystopia.
But the quiet acceptance that some lives matter less.
Watching it today, in a world reshaped by COVID, that theme hits harder than ever.
Because whether we admit it or not, we’ve seen our own version of that indifference.
When the pandemic took the elderly, the disabled, the chronically ill — the people who needed protection the most — far too many shrugged and said, “Well… they were old.”
As if age cancels out humanity.
As if frailty makes someone less deserving of breath.
As if love and connection somehow expire when you cross a statistical threshold.
That’s what makes Soylent Green feel so painfully relevant:
It shows a society that doesn’t hate its vulnerable.
It simply stops seeing them.
The deaths become normal.
The losses become background noise.
And eventually, the people who disappear are spoken of in past tense before they’re even gone.
Isn’t that what happened when “pre-existing conditions” became a punchline?
When “they had limited life expectancy” became a defence rather than a tragedy?
When tens of thousands of families were told, implicitly or aloud, that their grief didn’t count?
In the film, the euthanasia room is warm and peaceful — a lie wrapped in beauty.
Our version is colder:
a shrug,
a statistic,
a comment online that writes whole lives off as “inevitable.”
But the end result is the same.
A life ends, and those who should have valued it look the other way.
Soylent Green isn’t just a warning about the future.
It’s a mirror held up to our present.
A society’s true moral foundation is revealed in how fiercely it defends its most vulnerable.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Flu Surge Is the Warning Shot. What Comes After Could Be Worse.
🧵⬇️
Right now, the US is in the steep upward phase of a major flu wave, driven largely by H3N2 — a strain historically linked to higher hospitalisations and worse outcomes, especially for older adults and children.
This isn’t just about flu.
When flu is everywhere, it tells us something simple and important:
The air is risky right now.
The same shared indoor air spreading flu also spreads COVID-19, RSV, and other respiratory infections.
Flu is just the first virus to surge.
🔥 Kids & COVID: The Receipts They Don’t Want You to See
People keep saying “COVID is harmless for kids.”
So here’s what large studies from the UK, US, Kazakhstan, Brazil, India, and elsewhere actually show.
Short version:
COVID can affect kids’ hearts and blood vessels for months to years.
Repeated infections increase risk.
And we still don’t have long-term data on what repeated vascular hits mean for children.
The early signals? Not nothing.
1️⃣ UK (14 million kids)
A major 2025 analysis found that children with confirmed COVID had higher risk over the next 12 months of:
• myocarditis
• pericarditis
• blood clots
• inflammatory/vascular disorders
• low platelets
Importantly, these risks were higher and lasted longer after infection than anything seen after vaccination.
2️⃣ USA (RECOVER – over 1 million controls)
Comparing 300,000 infected kids to 915,000 uninfected, COVID infection was linked to increased risk of:
• hypertension
• arrhythmias
• myocarditis
• heart failure
• cardiomyopathy
• clots
• chest pain & palpitations
• even cardiac arrest
This was seen in healthy kids too, not only those with pre-existing conditions.