Israeli Infiltration into U.S. Homeland Security
Recent investigations have raised red flags about Israeli infiltration into United States governmental systems, particularly within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its sub-agency Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
While Israel is considered a close U.S. ally, evidence shows that Israeli intelligence and companies have actively penetrated U.S. security infrastructure – sometimes with American cooperation, other times through covert espionage [1][2]. This report examines the extent of Israeli infiltration and how it poses a national security threat.
The findings reveal a “schizoid” relationship [3]: even as the U.S. and Israel cooperate closely, Israeli entities have repeatedly exploited that trust, leaving American officials sounding the alarm over our vulnerabilities and naivete in the face of such brazen activities.
Recent investigations have raised red flags about Israeli infiltration into United States governmental systems, particularly within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its sub-agency Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
While Israel is considered a close U.S. ally, evidence shows that Israeli intelligence and companies have actively penetrated U.S. security infrastructure – sometimes with American cooperation, other times through covert espionage [1][2]. This report examines the extent of Israeli infiltration and how it poses a national security threat.
The findings reveal a “schizoid” relationship [3]: even as the U.S. and Israel cooperate closely, Israeli entities have repeatedly exploited that trust, leaving American officials sounding the alarm over our vulnerabilities and naivete in the face of such brazen activities.
A Pattern of Espionage and Infiltration
Despite official denials, Israel has a long history of aggressive espionage operations against the United States. A leaked 2007 NSA document (revealed by Edward Snowden) singled out Israel as a top espionage threat to U.S. government and intelligence services [4][5].
In fact, a U.S. National Intelligence Estimate ranked Israel’s intelligence apparatus as “the third most aggressive” against the U.S., behind only China and Russia [6].
This is extraordinary given Israel is ostensibly an ally – yet U.S. counterintelligence experts warn that “one of NSA’s biggest threats is actually from friendly intelligence services, like Israel”[7].
The breadth of Israeli operations has included espionage targeting U.S. government agencies, military and tech sectors, and “manipulation /influence operations aimed at U.S. public opinion and policymakers [8].
Simply put, Israeli spy services have not hesitated to steal secrets or influence U.S. decision-making from within.
Despite official denials, Israel has a long history of aggressive espionage operations against the United States. A leaked 2007 NSA document (revealed by Edward Snowden) singled out Israel as a top espionage threat to U.S. government and intelligence services [4][5].
In fact, a U.S. National Intelligence Estimate ranked Israel’s intelligence apparatus as “the third most aggressive” against the U.S., behind only China and Russia [6].
This is extraordinary given Israel is ostensibly an ally – yet U.S. counterintelligence experts warn that “one of NSA’s biggest threats is actually from friendly intelligence services, like Israel”[7].
The breadth of Israeli operations has included espionage targeting U.S. government agencies, military and tech sectors, and “manipulation /influence operations aimed at U.S. public opinion and policymakers [8].
Simply put, Israeli spy services have not hesitated to steal secrets or influence U.S. decision-making from within.
The Jonathan Pollard Case:
The most infamous example is Jonathan Pollard, a U.S. Navy intelligence analyst who betrayed America by spying for Israel in the 1980s.
Pollard stole an astonishing volume of classified documents – by one account, “10 feet by 6 feet by 6 feet” of secrets[9] – including signal intelligence manuals, surveillance parameters, and intelligence reports.
Among the troves was the NSA’s national SIGINT requirements list, detailing which communications the U.S. intercepted worldwide[10].
U.S. prosecutors said the damage Pollard caused was “beyond calculation”[11], one of the worst security breaches in American history. Shockingly, intelligence analysts believe some of Pollard’s stolen intel was handed to the Soviet Union – via Israeli intelligence – as a bargaining chip[12][13].
In other words, Israeli handlers traded U.S. secrets to Moscow, leveraging what Pollard stole to benefit Israel’s interests (such as securing Soviet Jewry’s emigration or deterring Soviet support to Arab states)[14][15].
Pollard’s handler in Israel was reportedly responsible for aiming Israel’s nuclear missiles at the USSR, and much of Pollard’s data was used to enhance Israel’s targeting capabilities[16].
This “Samson Option”-style strategy – threatening a nuclear strike to constrain superpower behavior – exemplifies how Israel used infiltrated intel for nuclear brinkmanship. (Notably, Pollard served 30 years in prison yet was hailed as a hero in Israel upon release[17][18], a stark reminder of the divergent perspectives between U.S. security and Israeli objectives.)
x.com/VoxExVeritas/s…
The most infamous example is Jonathan Pollard, a U.S. Navy intelligence analyst who betrayed America by spying for Israel in the 1980s.
Pollard stole an astonishing volume of classified documents – by one account, “10 feet by 6 feet by 6 feet” of secrets[9] – including signal intelligence manuals, surveillance parameters, and intelligence reports.
Among the troves was the NSA’s national SIGINT requirements list, detailing which communications the U.S. intercepted worldwide[10].
U.S. prosecutors said the damage Pollard caused was “beyond calculation”[11], one of the worst security breaches in American history. Shockingly, intelligence analysts believe some of Pollard’s stolen intel was handed to the Soviet Union – via Israeli intelligence – as a bargaining chip[12][13].
In other words, Israeli handlers traded U.S. secrets to Moscow, leveraging what Pollard stole to benefit Israel’s interests (such as securing Soviet Jewry’s emigration or deterring Soviet support to Arab states)[14][15].
Pollard’s handler in Israel was reportedly responsible for aiming Israel’s nuclear missiles at the USSR, and much of Pollard’s data was used to enhance Israel’s targeting capabilities[16].
This “Samson Option”-style strategy – threatening a nuclear strike to constrain superpower behavior – exemplifies how Israel used infiltrated intel for nuclear brinkmanship. (Notably, Pollard served 30 years in prison yet was hailed as a hero in Israel upon release[17][18], a stark reminder of the divergent perspectives between U.S. security and Israeli objectives.)
x.com/VoxExVeritas/s…
Other Espionage Incidents: The worst of which is right there☝️🏻
Pollard was not an isolated case. Throughout the 1990s and 2000s, U.S. counterintelligence frequently caught Israeli spies snooping on American soil. A 2014 Newsweek investigation revealed that from the mid-1990s onward – well after Israel’s post-Pollard promise to halt spying in the U.S. – FBI agents had to repeatedly confront Israeli officials about espionage[19].
One former top FBI counterintelligence officer said that in the decade after 9/11, Israeli diplomats in Washington were summoned “dozens” of times and told to “cut the shit,” only to shrug off the warnings [20][21].
“You can’t embarrass an Israeli,” the ex-official noted. “Catch them red-handed, and they shrug and say, ‘Okay, anything else?’”[22].
This brazen attitude was enabled by Israel’s political clout: as an ally, they almost always got away with only a scolding[23].
U.S. security personnel felt pressure from the “Israeli lobby” – influential friends of Israel in Congress and the administration – which protested strongly against any tough retaliation for Israeli spying [24].
Intelligence briefings about Israeli espionage had to be handled “very carefully,” as outraged pro-Israel lawmakers would intervene if they felt Israel was being slighted [25]. Such political interference often tied the hands of U.S. agencies, allowing Israeli infiltration activities to continue with impunity.
Pollard was not an isolated case. Throughout the 1990s and 2000s, U.S. counterintelligence frequently caught Israeli spies snooping on American soil. A 2014 Newsweek investigation revealed that from the mid-1990s onward – well after Israel’s post-Pollard promise to halt spying in the U.S. – FBI agents had to repeatedly confront Israeli officials about espionage[19].
One former top FBI counterintelligence officer said that in the decade after 9/11, Israeli diplomats in Washington were summoned “dozens” of times and told to “cut the shit,” only to shrug off the warnings [20][21].
“You can’t embarrass an Israeli,” the ex-official noted. “Catch them red-handed, and they shrug and say, ‘Okay, anything else?’”[22].
This brazen attitude was enabled by Israel’s political clout: as an ally, they almost always got away with only a scolding[23].
U.S. security personnel felt pressure from the “Israeli lobby” – influential friends of Israel in Congress and the administration – which protested strongly against any tough retaliation for Israeli spying [24].
Intelligence briefings about Israeli espionage had to be handled “very carefully,” as outraged pro-Israel lawmakers would intervene if they felt Israel was being slighted [25]. Such political interference often tied the hands of U.S. agencies, allowing Israeli infiltration activities to continue with impunity.
White House Surveillance:
One especially egregious espionage operation came to light in 2019 when U.S. officials discovered that cellphone eavesdropping devices (StingRays) were planted around the White House and other sensitive DC sites[26].
These miniature devices mimic cell towers to intercept calls and texts. A forensic investigation by the FBI and DHS concluded “it was pretty clear that the Israelis were responsible” for the spy devices – likely intending to monitor then-President Trump’s communications[27][28].
Israel’s government vehemently denied the accusation, reiterating its official policy not to conduct espionage in the U.S.[29]. But multiple former U.S. intelligence officials affirmed the evidence of Israeli involvement, and noted that the Trump administration (priding itself on being “the most pro-Israel” in history) chose not to publicly rebuke Israel for this brazen spying[30].
Under any other circumstances, planting bugs near the White House would prompt severe diplomatic fallout; in this case, it was largely swept under the rug. The incident demonstrates Israel’s willingness to target the highest levels of U.S. government – even the President – and how political considerations can prevent full accountability. Such infiltration of communications at the heart of U.S. power is a glaring national security breach.
One especially egregious espionage operation came to light in 2019 when U.S. officials discovered that cellphone eavesdropping devices (StingRays) were planted around the White House and other sensitive DC sites[26].
These miniature devices mimic cell towers to intercept calls and texts. A forensic investigation by the FBI and DHS concluded “it was pretty clear that the Israelis were responsible” for the spy devices – likely intending to monitor then-President Trump’s communications[27][28].
Israel’s government vehemently denied the accusation, reiterating its official policy not to conduct espionage in the U.S.[29]. But multiple former U.S. intelligence officials affirmed the evidence of Israeli involvement, and noted that the Trump administration (priding itself on being “the most pro-Israel” in history) chose not to publicly rebuke Israel for this brazen spying[30].
Under any other circumstances, planting bugs near the White House would prompt severe diplomatic fallout; in this case, it was largely swept under the rug. The incident demonstrates Israel’s willingness to target the highest levels of U.S. government – even the President – and how political considerations can prevent full accountability. Such infiltration of communications at the heart of U.S. power is a glaring national security breach.
Diplomatic and Industrial Espionage:
Israeli espionage has extended into diplomatic arenas and the private sector as well. During sensitive U.S.-led negotiations (for example, the 2013 Iran nuclear talks), Israeli eavesdropping was suspected – Der Spiegel reported that Israel intercepted calls of Secretary of State John Kerry during peace negotiations[31].
Likewise, Israel has been accused of running “influence operations” to covertly sway U.S. policy and public opinion[32]. In business and tech, Israeli companies have sometimes been seen as Trojan horses.
For instance, in the early 2000s, investigations (including a now-infamous Fox News report) pointed to Israeli telecom firms with U.S. contracts – such as Amdocs (handling U.S. phone billing records) and Comverse Infosys (providing wiretapping equipment to law enforcement) – as potential conduits for Israeli intelligence.
The concern was that these firms’ access to American communications data could be exploited to feed information back to Israel, compromising the integrity of U.S. telecommunications. One counterintelligence veteran told CounterPunch, “Trojan horse espionage is part of the way of life of companies in Israel.
It’s a culture of spying”, indicating that seemingly legitimate tech business can double as espionage tools[33]. While Israeli officials denied such allegations and some reports were controversial, the fear of backdoors in critical infrastructure was very real – so much so that pursuing the inquiry was described as “career suicide” for U.S. investigators[34].
These episodes underscore the broad scope of Israeli infiltration, from bugging government buildings to embedding in supply chains.
Israeli espionage has extended into diplomatic arenas and the private sector as well. During sensitive U.S.-led negotiations (for example, the 2013 Iran nuclear talks), Israeli eavesdropping was suspected – Der Spiegel reported that Israel intercepted calls of Secretary of State John Kerry during peace negotiations[31].
Likewise, Israel has been accused of running “influence operations” to covertly sway U.S. policy and public opinion[32]. In business and tech, Israeli companies have sometimes been seen as Trojan horses.
For instance, in the early 2000s, investigations (including a now-infamous Fox News report) pointed to Israeli telecom firms with U.S. contracts – such as Amdocs (handling U.S. phone billing records) and Comverse Infosys (providing wiretapping equipment to law enforcement) – as potential conduits for Israeli intelligence.
The concern was that these firms’ access to American communications data could be exploited to feed information back to Israel, compromising the integrity of U.S. telecommunications. One counterintelligence veteran told CounterPunch, “Trojan horse espionage is part of the way of life of companies in Israel.
It’s a culture of spying”, indicating that seemingly legitimate tech business can double as espionage tools[33]. While Israeli officials denied such allegations and some reports were controversial, the fear of backdoors in critical infrastructure was very real – so much so that pursuing the inquiry was described as “career suicide” for U.S. investigators[34].
These episodes underscore the broad scope of Israeli infiltration, from bugging government buildings to embedding in supply chains.
Infiltration of DHS and ICE Systems
In recent years, Israel’s reach has extended into the heart of DHS through technology contracts and partnerships. The most striking example is the introduction of Israeli-made spyware into ICE’s operations, raising alarms about foreign influence over U.S. domestic security tools.
The Paragon Spyware Deal: In 2024, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) quietly contracted with Paragon Solutions, an Israeli-founded cyber-intelligence company, to obtain its premier spyware product called “Graphite.” Graphite is a powerful zero-click phone hacking tool – it can remotely penetrate any smartphone, even encrypted apps like WhatsApp or Signal, without the target’s knowledge[35][36].
Once deployed, Graphite essentially takes control of a phone, allowing operators to track the user’s location, read messages and photos, and even turn the phone’s microphone or camera into a live surveillance device*[37]. In effect, this spyware can vacuum up every intimate detail from a target’s mobile device – a capability “once reserved for the world’s most vaunted spy agencies,” now being handed to a domestic law enforcement agency[38].
The ICE-Paragon contract (worth about $2 million) was initially signed under the Biden administration in late 2024[39]. However, Biden’s team paused the deal for a compliance review, since just months earlier the White House had issued an Executive Order banning U.S. agencies from using commercial spyware that poses counterintelligence or security risks[40].
This Executive Order was motivated by scandals involving tools like Pegasus (made by Israel’s NSO Group) which had been misused by foreign governments to target dissidents and even U.S. citizens. In fact, the Biden administration took the unprecedented step of blacklisting NSO Group on a Commerce Department export-control list for its role in “maliciously targeting” journalists and activists abroad[41]. - (Pretty fucked up that the dems were making better national security choices than the Trump admin isn't it?) - Paragon’s Graphite, as a similar tool, fell into a gray area – it wasn’t blacklisted, but its use had to be evaluated under the new spyware guidelines.
In mid-2025, the Trump administration (having returned to office) abruptly lifted the hold and reactivated the Paragon deal[42][43]. ICE’s cyber unit was now cleared to deploy “one of the world’s most sophisticated hacking tools”[44], developed outside the U.S. by former Israeli intelligence veterans. Notably, Paragon had been acquired by a U.S. investment firm in 2024 (perhaps to assuage ownership concerns), but its product’s origin and core developers remain Israeli[45][46]. This move essentially arms a domestic agency with foreign-made spyware, raising serious national security questions.
In recent years, Israel’s reach has extended into the heart of DHS through technology contracts and partnerships. The most striking example is the introduction of Israeli-made spyware into ICE’s operations, raising alarms about foreign influence over U.S. domestic security tools.
The Paragon Spyware Deal: In 2024, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) quietly contracted with Paragon Solutions, an Israeli-founded cyber-intelligence company, to obtain its premier spyware product called “Graphite.” Graphite is a powerful zero-click phone hacking tool – it can remotely penetrate any smartphone, even encrypted apps like WhatsApp or Signal, without the target’s knowledge[35][36].
Once deployed, Graphite essentially takes control of a phone, allowing operators to track the user’s location, read messages and photos, and even turn the phone’s microphone or camera into a live surveillance device*[37]. In effect, this spyware can vacuum up every intimate detail from a target’s mobile device – a capability “once reserved for the world’s most vaunted spy agencies,” now being handed to a domestic law enforcement agency[38].
The ICE-Paragon contract (worth about $2 million) was initially signed under the Biden administration in late 2024[39]. However, Biden’s team paused the deal for a compliance review, since just months earlier the White House had issued an Executive Order banning U.S. agencies from using commercial spyware that poses counterintelligence or security risks[40].
This Executive Order was motivated by scandals involving tools like Pegasus (made by Israel’s NSO Group) which had been misused by foreign governments to target dissidents and even U.S. citizens. In fact, the Biden administration took the unprecedented step of blacklisting NSO Group on a Commerce Department export-control list for its role in “maliciously targeting” journalists and activists abroad[41]. - (Pretty fucked up that the dems were making better national security choices than the Trump admin isn't it?) - Paragon’s Graphite, as a similar tool, fell into a gray area – it wasn’t blacklisted, but its use had to be evaluated under the new spyware guidelines.
In mid-2025, the Trump administration (having returned to office) abruptly lifted the hold and reactivated the Paragon deal[42][43]. ICE’s cyber unit was now cleared to deploy “one of the world’s most sophisticated hacking tools”[44], developed outside the U.S. by former Israeli intelligence veterans. Notably, Paragon had been acquired by a U.S. investment firm in 2024 (perhaps to assuage ownership concerns), but its product’s origin and core developers remain Israeli[45][46]. This move essentially arms a domestic agency with foreign-made spyware, raising serious national security questions.
Risks of Foreign Spyware in U.S. Agencies:
From a U.S. government perspective, allowing Israeli spyware into DHS systems should be viewed as extremely perilous.
First, there’s the counterintelligence risk:
Graphite is a proprietary tool that Israel has also sold to other countries. As Citizen Lab researcher John Scott-Railton warns, “As long as the same mercenary spyware tech is going to multiple governments, there is a baked-in counterintelligence risk”[47].
Any nation that has access to Graphite (or knowledge of its exploits) could potentially detect its use or develop countermeasures, nullifying our operational advantage[48].
Even worse, those foreign clients – or the company’s own insiders – would “know what secret surveillance tech the US is using,” and gain “special insights on how to track what the US is doing with it.”[49] I
n short, by using an Israeli commercial spyware, we are exposing our playbook to others who have the same tool. This undermines U.S. intelligence and law enforcement secrecy.
From a U.S. government perspective, allowing Israeli spyware into DHS systems should be viewed as extremely perilous.
First, there’s the counterintelligence risk:
Graphite is a proprietary tool that Israel has also sold to other countries. As Citizen Lab researcher John Scott-Railton warns, “As long as the same mercenary spyware tech is going to multiple governments, there is a baked-in counterintelligence risk”[47].
Any nation that has access to Graphite (or knowledge of its exploits) could potentially detect its use or develop countermeasures, nullifying our operational advantage[48].
Even worse, those foreign clients – or the company’s own insiders – would “know what secret surveillance tech the US is using,” and gain “special insights on how to track what the US is doing with it.”[49] I
n short, by using an Israeli commercial spyware, we are exposing our playbook to others who have the same tool. This undermines U.S. intelligence and law enforcement secrecy.
Secondly, there’s the risk of improper use or backdoors. The Biden executive order explicitly warned against spyware that could be misused by a foreign government or person[50]. Paragon claims it abides by “democratic values” and only works with authorized governments, but refuses to disclose its clients or how they use the tech[51][52].
We have to ask: what assurance do we have that data obtained via Graphite remains only in U.S. hands? If the spyware “phones home” for updates or if Israeli engineers retained any access, sensitive information from Americans’ devices could leak abroad. Indeed, the U.S. has historically been wary of foreign-made surveillance tech precisely because of such hidden risks[53]. (For example, concerns about Kaspersky anti-virus software – a Russian product – led to it being banned from U.S. government networks due to fears it might covertly channel data to Moscow. The same logic applies here with an Israeli product.)
Furthermore, the quiet, under-the-radar approval of Graphite for ICE hints at a lapse in vetting. Nadine Farid Johnson of the Knight First Amendment Institute pointed out that waiving the stop-work order without public explanation suggests parts of the executive branch may have skirted their own vetting requirements[54].
In other words, someone pushed this through “without adherence” to the normal security reviews[55]. That raises the question: Who advocated for the Israeli spyware, and were security concerns fully addressed or overridden for political reasons? If proper due diligence was sidelined, that itself is a sign of potential undue influence or infiltration in decision-making.
We have to ask: what assurance do we have that data obtained via Graphite remains only in U.S. hands? If the spyware “phones home” for updates or if Israeli engineers retained any access, sensitive information from Americans’ devices could leak abroad. Indeed, the U.S. has historically been wary of foreign-made surveillance tech precisely because of such hidden risks[53]. (For example, concerns about Kaspersky anti-virus software – a Russian product – led to it being banned from U.S. government networks due to fears it might covertly channel data to Moscow. The same logic applies here with an Israeli product.)
Furthermore, the quiet, under-the-radar approval of Graphite for ICE hints at a lapse in vetting. Nadine Farid Johnson of the Knight First Amendment Institute pointed out that waiving the stop-work order without public explanation suggests parts of the executive branch may have skirted their own vetting requirements[54].
In other words, someone pushed this through “without adherence” to the normal security reviews[55]. That raises the question: Who advocated for the Israeli spyware, and were security concerns fully addressed or overridden for political reasons? If proper due diligence was sidelined, that itself is a sign of potential undue influence or infiltration in decision-making.
Other DHS Inroads:
Israeli firms have long been entwined with U.S. homeland security beyond just spyware. The global homeland security industry features many Israeli companies (often founded by ex-military/intel officers) selling surveillance cameras, bomb detection tech, screening systems, and more.
In fact, Israeli expertise in counterterrorism has been actively courted by U.S. agencies since 9/11 – sometimes with open arms[56][57].
For instance, DHS has purchased Israeli-made cameras and screening tools, and American officials regularly visit Israel to learn security techniques[58][59].
On the surface, this is cooperation – but it also creates dependencies on foreign technology and methods. A notable example is when U.S. airport security adopted Israeli behavior-detection techniques, effectively importing Israeli methodology into TSA protocols[60]. While such collaboration is not espionage, it does embed Israeli approaches and products deeply into our security infrastructure. If any of those products have undisclosed vulnerabilities or if Israeli firms maintain any control (e.g., software updates), it provides an avenue for infiltration. The sheer prevalence of Israeli contractors in U.S. security – sometimes jokingly referred to as Israel being the “14th Department of Homeland Security” – means vigilance is needed.
Even friendly partnerships can mask a quiet siphoning of information. Imagine what israel is doing, considering how they just welcomed back Pollard like a hero.
Israeli firms have long been entwined with U.S. homeland security beyond just spyware. The global homeland security industry features many Israeli companies (often founded by ex-military/intel officers) selling surveillance cameras, bomb detection tech, screening systems, and more.
In fact, Israeli expertise in counterterrorism has been actively courted by U.S. agencies since 9/11 – sometimes with open arms[56][57].
For instance, DHS has purchased Israeli-made cameras and screening tools, and American officials regularly visit Israel to learn security techniques[58][59].
On the surface, this is cooperation – but it also creates dependencies on foreign technology and methods. A notable example is when U.S. airport security adopted Israeli behavior-detection techniques, effectively importing Israeli methodology into TSA protocols[60]. While such collaboration is not espionage, it does embed Israeli approaches and products deeply into our security infrastructure. If any of those products have undisclosed vulnerabilities or if Israeli firms maintain any control (e.g., software updates), it provides an avenue for infiltration. The sheer prevalence of Israeli contractors in U.S. security – sometimes jokingly referred to as Israel being the “14th Department of Homeland Security” – means vigilance is needed.
Even friendly partnerships can mask a quiet siphoning of information. Imagine what israel is doing, considering how they just welcomed back Pollard like a hero.
Compromised National Secrets:
When a foreign country infiltrates U.S. systems, our most sensitive information and plans are at risk. In the case of Israel, the damage from past espionage has been massive – Pollard’s theft alone compromised U.S. intelligence capabilities worldwide[61][62]. Pollard handed over detailed NSA manuals and surveillance schedules, meaning Israel (and by extension, other actors who obtained the info) knew exactly what U.S. intelligence was monitoring and how[63][64].
Such knowledge allows an adversary to evade U.S. eyes and even hunt down U.S. assets. Indeed, there were “losses of human and technical intelligence” inside Soviet territory attributed to Pollard’s leaks[65] – a chilling implication that American spies or informants likely died or were compromised as a result.
Every time Israeli operatives infiltrate an agency like DHS or ICE, there’s a chance that counterterrorism data, classified reports, or personal data on Americans could be siphoned out. This isn’t just hypothetical – Israeli spies have been caught with U.S. State Department cryptographic codes in the past, and attempts to bug the White House show even top-secret conversations are not off-limits[66].
Allowing Israeli-developed tools into our networks could inadvertently grant backdoor access to those secrets we haven’t already willingly shared.
When a foreign country infiltrates U.S. systems, our most sensitive information and plans are at risk. In the case of Israel, the damage from past espionage has been massive – Pollard’s theft alone compromised U.S. intelligence capabilities worldwide[61][62]. Pollard handed over detailed NSA manuals and surveillance schedules, meaning Israel (and by extension, other actors who obtained the info) knew exactly what U.S. intelligence was monitoring and how[63][64].
Such knowledge allows an adversary to evade U.S. eyes and even hunt down U.S. assets. Indeed, there were “losses of human and technical intelligence” inside Soviet territory attributed to Pollard’s leaks[65] – a chilling implication that American spies or informants likely died or were compromised as a result.
Every time Israeli operatives infiltrate an agency like DHS or ICE, there’s a chance that counterterrorism data, classified reports, or personal data on Americans could be siphoned out. This isn’t just hypothetical – Israeli spies have been caught with U.S. State Department cryptographic codes in the past, and attempts to bug the White House show even top-secret conversations are not off-limits[66].
Allowing Israeli-developed tools into our networks could inadvertently grant backdoor access to those secrets we haven’t already willingly shared.
Counterintelligence Nightmare:
From a counterintelligence standpoint, Israeli infiltration is especially vexing because it exploits our trust and our open system. The U.S. and Israel share a great deal of intelligence as "allies" – but Israel has been known to “trade” what it learns, even U.S.-derived intel, with third parties to advance its agenda[67][68].
This double game makes it hard for American officials to fully trust that information or technology shared with Israel will remain secure.
Moreover, when Israel sells advanced spyware or security tech around the world (often built on expertise gained partly through U.S. funding or cooperation), it erodes U.S. technological edge and creates global vulnerabilities. “Mercenary spyware” like Graphite being in multiple hands means the U.S. cannot monopolize its offensive cyber tools[69].
Adversaries can study these tools, detect them, and even reverse-engineer them. In essence, Israeli companies’ global business can telegraph U.S. methods to hostile actors – a serious risk if ICE or other agencies rely on those tools.
A government analyst would note that any foreign-supplied technology in a sensitive domain must be treated as a potential Trojan horse.
From a counterintelligence standpoint, Israeli infiltration is especially vexing because it exploits our trust and our open system. The U.S. and Israel share a great deal of intelligence as "allies" – but Israel has been known to “trade” what it learns, even U.S.-derived intel, with third parties to advance its agenda[67][68].
This double game makes it hard for American officials to fully trust that information or technology shared with Israel will remain secure.
Moreover, when Israel sells advanced spyware or security tech around the world (often built on expertise gained partly through U.S. funding or cooperation), it erodes U.S. technological edge and creates global vulnerabilities. “Mercenary spyware” like Graphite being in multiple hands means the U.S. cannot monopolize its offensive cyber tools[69].
Adversaries can study these tools, detect them, and even reverse-engineer them. In essence, Israeli companies’ global business can telegraph U.S. methods to hostile actors – a serious risk if ICE or other agencies rely on those tools.
A government analyst would note that any foreign-supplied technology in a sensitive domain must be treated as a potential Trojan horse.
Blackmail and Leverage: The Name Of The Game
Perhaps the most disturbing aspect is how Israeli infiltrations can be used to blackmail or pressure the United States. Because of the unique U.S.-Israel political relationship, Israeli officials have at times pushed the envelope, knowing Washington’s responses are constrained.
Former CIA officer John Kiriakou recently revealed a stunning example: during a conflict, Israeli officials privately threatened the Trump administration that Israel would use nuclear weapons against Iran if the U.S. refused to bomb Iran’s nuclear sites[70][71].
This was essentially nuclear extortion, leveraging Israel’s clandestine arsenal (built in part with materials and know-how often acquired without U.S. approval) to force America’s hand. (Pollard also made nuclear threat: see above)
President Trump reportedly felt he had to consider U.S. airstrikes as the “lesser evil” to prevent Israel from resorting to nukes[72].
Such extreme coercion highlights the unthinkable leverage a foreign ally tried to exert over U.S. policy – a scenario that would be impossible had the U.S. not allowed Israel to develop such capabilities under wraps.
Now consider espionage: if Israel, through an infiltrated system or spy, obtains compromising information on U.S. leaders or plans, it could threaten to leak or misuse that intel unless the U.S. aligns with Israeli interests. In effect, Israeli intelligence could “laugh in our faces,” knowing they hold cards to manipulate U.S. decision-making. (as they're doing now)
The “Samson Option” mindset – if cornered, take everyone down with you – means Israel might not shy away from using even blackmail with sensitive U.S. data or technology. This is not a hypothetical fear; it’s grounded in incidents like the Pollard affair, where Israel initially denied involvement, then relentlessly lobbied for Pollard’s release for decades[73][74].
The takeaway is that a penetrated ally can quickly turn into a perilous adversary when interests diverge, armed with our own secrets.
Perhaps the most disturbing aspect is how Israeli infiltrations can be used to blackmail or pressure the United States. Because of the unique U.S.-Israel political relationship, Israeli officials have at times pushed the envelope, knowing Washington’s responses are constrained.
Former CIA officer John Kiriakou recently revealed a stunning example: during a conflict, Israeli officials privately threatened the Trump administration that Israel would use nuclear weapons against Iran if the U.S. refused to bomb Iran’s nuclear sites[70][71].
This was essentially nuclear extortion, leveraging Israel’s clandestine arsenal (built in part with materials and know-how often acquired without U.S. approval) to force America’s hand. (Pollard also made nuclear threat: see above)
President Trump reportedly felt he had to consider U.S. airstrikes as the “lesser evil” to prevent Israel from resorting to nukes[72].
Such extreme coercion highlights the unthinkable leverage a foreign ally tried to exert over U.S. policy – a scenario that would be impossible had the U.S. not allowed Israel to develop such capabilities under wraps.
Now consider espionage: if Israel, through an infiltrated system or spy, obtains compromising information on U.S. leaders or plans, it could threaten to leak or misuse that intel unless the U.S. aligns with Israeli interests. In effect, Israeli intelligence could “laugh in our faces,” knowing they hold cards to manipulate U.S. decision-making. (as they're doing now)
The “Samson Option” mindset – if cornered, take everyone down with you – means Israel might not shy away from using even blackmail with sensitive U.S. data or technology. This is not a hypothetical fear; it’s grounded in incidents like the Pollard affair, where Israel initially denied involvement, then relentlessly lobbied for Pollard’s release for decades[73][74].
The takeaway is that a penetrated ally can quickly turn into a perilous adversary when interests diverge, armed with our own secrets.
Undermining U.S. Sovereignty and Law:
Allowing Israeli infiltration also undercuts the rule of law and U.S. sovereignty. For example, ICE’s use of Graphite spyware raises constitutional and legal issues. This tool, designed originally by and for foreign intelligence, is highly invasive, potentially violating privacy rights if misused.
Its deployment against people on U.S. soil without robust oversight could lead to Israel targeting journalists, activists, or lawyers (as has happened abroad with similar spyware[75][76]). There are multiple examples of this in play as we speak. Example: x.com/JDVance/status…
By quietly outsourcing such capability to an Israeli entity, DHS is bypassing domestic restrictions and expertise, creating a accountability gap. Moreover, when Israeli spying incidents are hushed up due to political pressure[77][78], it signals that certain allies are above the law. This erodes morale among U.S. counterintelligence officers (who see their work brushed aside) and sets a dangerous precedent.
If Israeli agents can infiltrate and face no real consequences, what message does that send to other foreign intelligence services? It practically invites further penetration by others who assume the U.S. won’t retaliate strongly. A government agency must treat any breach – even by a "friend" – as a serious offense, or risk losing control of its security environment.
Allowing Israeli infiltration also undercuts the rule of law and U.S. sovereignty. For example, ICE’s use of Graphite spyware raises constitutional and legal issues. This tool, designed originally by and for foreign intelligence, is highly invasive, potentially violating privacy rights if misused.
Its deployment against people on U.S. soil without robust oversight could lead to Israel targeting journalists, activists, or lawyers (as has happened abroad with similar spyware[75][76]). There are multiple examples of this in play as we speak. Example: x.com/JDVance/status…
By quietly outsourcing such capability to an Israeli entity, DHS is bypassing domestic restrictions and expertise, creating a accountability gap. Moreover, when Israeli spying incidents are hushed up due to political pressure[77][78], it signals that certain allies are above the law. This erodes morale among U.S. counterintelligence officers (who see their work brushed aside) and sets a dangerous precedent.
If Israeli agents can infiltrate and face no real consequences, what message does that send to other foreign intelligence services? It practically invites further penetration by others who assume the U.S. won’t retaliate strongly. A government agency must treat any breach – even by a "friend" – as a serious offense, or risk losing control of its security environment.
Humiliating our National Security Establishment:
Finally, Israeli infiltration, when exposed, embarrasses the United States on the world stage. Our adversaries and allies alike observe these episodes.
When Israeli ex-agents or politicians boast in private about how “easy” it was to dupe America, it degrades U.S. credibility and deterrence. Indeed, the sheer boldness of some operations (like the White House spying) suggests Israeli operatives believed the U.S. was either owned, too distracted or too timid to catch them – essentially viewing America as an easy mark.
This perception is deeply dangerous: if foreign operatives are “laughing” at U.S. security for being so permeable, it invites even riskier intrusions by others. Already, one former U.S. intelligence official noted that dealing with Israeli spies was uniquely frustrating because “no matter how high [the U.S. official], [the Israelis] throw everything at you” – from lavish hospitality to sexual entrapment(Epstein) – in attempts to breach security[79][80].
Such aggressive tactics imply a confidence that Americans can be easily corrupted or outmaneuvered. We cannot afford to be seen as gullible or weak in protecting our government’s integrity. Every successful Israeli infiltration (left unpunished) projects an image that U.S. security is porous and that we don’t even hold "friends" accountable. That in turn could weaken alliances (partners might fear sharing intel with us if it leaks to Israel) and strengthen enemies (who see opportunity in our laxity).
Finally, Israeli infiltration, when exposed, embarrasses the United States on the world stage. Our adversaries and allies alike observe these episodes.
When Israeli ex-agents or politicians boast in private about how “easy” it was to dupe America, it degrades U.S. credibility and deterrence. Indeed, the sheer boldness of some operations (like the White House spying) suggests Israeli operatives believed the U.S. was either owned, too distracted or too timid to catch them – essentially viewing America as an easy mark.
This perception is deeply dangerous: if foreign operatives are “laughing” at U.S. security for being so permeable, it invites even riskier intrusions by others. Already, one former U.S. intelligence official noted that dealing with Israeli spies was uniquely frustrating because “no matter how high [the U.S. official], [the Israelis] throw everything at you” – from lavish hospitality to sexual entrapment(Epstein) – in attempts to breach security[79][80].
Such aggressive tactics imply a confidence that Americans can be easily corrupted or outmaneuvered. We cannot afford to be seen as gullible or weak in protecting our government’s integrity. Every successful Israeli infiltration (left unpunished) projects an image that U.S. security is porous and that we don’t even hold "friends" accountable. That in turn could weaken alliances (partners might fear sharing intel with us if it leaks to Israel) and strengthen enemies (who see opportunity in our laxity).
Conclusion: Fuck Israel
From the perspective of a U.S. government agency tasked with safeguarding national security, Israeli infiltration of our systems – including DHS and ICE – is absolutely unacceptable and presents a multifaceted threat.
It endangers our secrets, compromises our technological edge, and even gives a foreign power potential leverage over U.S. policy through illicit means.
While cooperation with Israel is claimed to yields benefits in counterterrorism and innovation, the pattern of espionage and overreach documented over decades can no longer be downplayed.
American officials have privately expressed astonishment at the “overwhelming” evidence of Israeli spying[81] and interference, which has even halted initiatives like visa waivers in the past. It’s time to echo that astonishment publicly: no ally, however close, should be allowed to infiltrate the U.S. government without consequences.
In practical terms, this means rigorously vetting any foreign technology in U.S. security agencies, and enforcing the spirit of laws and executive orders that bar tools posing foreign counterintelligence risks[82].
It means boosting counterespionage monitoring even for allied nation activities – acknowledging that the category of “friendly spy” is not an oxymoron but a reality (as NSA documents made clear[83]).
And it likely means reassessing the depth of foreign penetration in areas like communications infrastructure, federal contracting, and even personnel. We should recall the blunt truth voiced by a former U.S. intelligence operative:
"if any country other than Israel conducted this level of spying on us, the outrage would be deafening[84]."
U.S. security must not be subject to double standards – the integrity of our nation’s defenses requires that we respond to Israeli infiltration with the same resolve as we would to any other espionage threat.
Ultimately, the U.S. cannot allow its benevolence to be weaponized against it. The image of Jonathan Pollard – an American turncoat embraced in Tel Aviv as a hero – laughing with his Israeli handlers about the ease of his betrayal is a lasting blow to our intelligence community.
Today, as new forms of infiltration unfold (from spyware in our agents’ hands[85] to Israeli eavesdropping gear outside the Oval Office[86]), we must not be “stupid” or naive about the danger. Infiltration by any foreign actor erodes sovereignty and security – and when that actor is as sophisticated and motivated as Israel, the threat is colossal.
The U.S. government must tackle this challenge head-on: through stricter controls, candid exposure of violations, and a firm message that friendship does not grant immunity to subversion.
The stakes are nothing less than our national security, sovereignty and self-respect on the world stage. More likely, American lives.
From the perspective of a U.S. government agency tasked with safeguarding national security, Israeli infiltration of our systems – including DHS and ICE – is absolutely unacceptable and presents a multifaceted threat.
It endangers our secrets, compromises our technological edge, and even gives a foreign power potential leverage over U.S. policy through illicit means.
While cooperation with Israel is claimed to yields benefits in counterterrorism and innovation, the pattern of espionage and overreach documented over decades can no longer be downplayed.
American officials have privately expressed astonishment at the “overwhelming” evidence of Israeli spying[81] and interference, which has even halted initiatives like visa waivers in the past. It’s time to echo that astonishment publicly: no ally, however close, should be allowed to infiltrate the U.S. government without consequences.
In practical terms, this means rigorously vetting any foreign technology in U.S. security agencies, and enforcing the spirit of laws and executive orders that bar tools posing foreign counterintelligence risks[82].
It means boosting counterespionage monitoring even for allied nation activities – acknowledging that the category of “friendly spy” is not an oxymoron but a reality (as NSA documents made clear[83]).
And it likely means reassessing the depth of foreign penetration in areas like communications infrastructure, federal contracting, and even personnel. We should recall the blunt truth voiced by a former U.S. intelligence operative:
"if any country other than Israel conducted this level of spying on us, the outrage would be deafening[84]."
U.S. security must not be subject to double standards – the integrity of our nation’s defenses requires that we respond to Israeli infiltration with the same resolve as we would to any other espionage threat.
Ultimately, the U.S. cannot allow its benevolence to be weaponized against it. The image of Jonathan Pollard – an American turncoat embraced in Tel Aviv as a hero – laughing with his Israeli handlers about the ease of his betrayal is a lasting blow to our intelligence community.
Today, as new forms of infiltration unfold (from spyware in our agents’ hands[85] to Israeli eavesdropping gear outside the Oval Office[86]), we must not be “stupid” or naive about the danger. Infiltration by any foreign actor erodes sovereignty and security – and when that actor is as sophisticated and motivated as Israel, the threat is colossal.
The U.S. government must tackle this challenge head-on: through stricter controls, candid exposure of violations, and a firm message that friendship does not grant immunity to subversion.
The stakes are nothing less than our national security, sovereignty and self-respect on the world stage. More likely, American lives.
Sources:
1) newsweek.com/israel-flagged…
2) theguardian.com/world/2019/sep…
3) newsweek.com/israel-flagged…
4) newsweek.com/israel-flagged…
5) newsweek.com/israel-flagged…
6) newsweek.com/israel-flagged…
7) newsweek.com/israel-flagged…
8) newsweek.com/israel-flagged…
9) acjna.org/articles/what-…
10) acjna.org/articles/what-…
11) acjna.org/articles/what-…
12) acjna.org/articles/what-…
13) acjna.org/articles/what-…
14) acjna.org/articles/what-…
15) acjna.org/articles/what-…
16) acjna.org/articles/what-…
17) acjna.org/articles/what-…
18) acjna.org/articles/what-…
19) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…
20) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…
21) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…
22) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…
23) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…
24) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…,
25) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…
26) theguardian.com/world/2019/sep…
27) theguardian.com/world/2019/sep…
28) theguardian.com/world/2019/sep…
29) theguardian.com/world/2019/sep…
30) theguardian.com/world/2019/sep…
31) newsweek.com/israel-flagged…
32) newsweek.com/israel-flagged…
33) counterpunch.org/2008/09/27/an-…
34) indybay.org/newsitems/2001…
35) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
36) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
37) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
38) bostonreview.net/articles/the-s…
39) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
40) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
41) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
42) bostonreview.net/articles/the-s…
43) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
44) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
45) bostonreview.net/articles/the-s…
46) bostonreview.net/articles/the-s…
47) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
48) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
49) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
1) newsweek.com/israel-flagged…
2) theguardian.com/world/2019/sep…
3) newsweek.com/israel-flagged…
4) newsweek.com/israel-flagged…
5) newsweek.com/israel-flagged…
6) newsweek.com/israel-flagged…
7) newsweek.com/israel-flagged…
8) newsweek.com/israel-flagged…
9) acjna.org/articles/what-…
10) acjna.org/articles/what-…
11) acjna.org/articles/what-…
12) acjna.org/articles/what-…
13) acjna.org/articles/what-…
14) acjna.org/articles/what-…
15) acjna.org/articles/what-…
16) acjna.org/articles/what-…
17) acjna.org/articles/what-…
18) acjna.org/articles/what-…
19) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…
20) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…
21) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…
22) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…
23) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…
24) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…,
25) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…
26) theguardian.com/world/2019/sep…
27) theguardian.com/world/2019/sep…
28) theguardian.com/world/2019/sep…
29) theguardian.com/world/2019/sep…
30) theguardian.com/world/2019/sep…
31) newsweek.com/israel-flagged…
32) newsweek.com/israel-flagged…
33) counterpunch.org/2008/09/27/an-…
34) indybay.org/newsitems/2001…
35) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
36) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
37) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
38) bostonreview.net/articles/the-s…
39) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
40) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
41) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
42) bostonreview.net/articles/the-s…
43) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
44) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
45) bostonreview.net/articles/the-s…
46) bostonreview.net/articles/the-s…
47) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
48) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
49) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
Sources 2:
50) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
51) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
52) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
53) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
54) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
55) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
56) rusi.org/publication/is…
57) rusi.org/publication/is…
58) rusi.org/publication/is…
59) rusi.org/publication/is…
60) rusi.org/publication/is…
61) acjna.org/articles/what-…
62) acjna.org/articles/what-…
63) acjna.org/articles/what-…
64) acjna.org/articles/what-…
65) acjna.org/articles/what-…
66) theguardian.com/world/2019/sep…
67) acjna.org/articles/what-…
68) acjna.org/articles/what-…
69) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
70) iranpress.com/content/313015…
71) iranpress.com/content/313015…
72) iranpress.com/content/313015…
73) acjna.org/articles/what-…
74) acjna.org/articles/what-…
75) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
76) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
77) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…,
78) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…
79) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…
80) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…
81) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…
82) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
83) newsweek.com/israel-flagged…
84) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…
85) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
86) theguardian.com/world/2019/sep…
50) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
51) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
52) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
53) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
54) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
55) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
56) rusi.org/publication/is…
57) rusi.org/publication/is…
58) rusi.org/publication/is…
59) rusi.org/publication/is…
60) rusi.org/publication/is…
61) acjna.org/articles/what-…
62) acjna.org/articles/what-…
63) acjna.org/articles/what-…
64) acjna.org/articles/what-…
65) acjna.org/articles/what-…
66) theguardian.com/world/2019/sep…
67) acjna.org/articles/what-…
68) acjna.org/articles/what-…
69) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
70) iranpress.com/content/313015…
71) iranpress.com/content/313015…
72) iranpress.com/content/313015…
73) acjna.org/articles/what-…
74) acjna.org/articles/what-…
75) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
76) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
77) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…,
78) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…
79) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…
80) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…
81) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…
82) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
83) newsweek.com/israel-flagged…
84) mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newswe…
85) theguardian.com/us-news/2025/s…
86) theguardian.com/world/2019/sep…
This video didn't actually display up there.
https://x.com/VoxExVeritas/status/1992316149703262380?s=20
Here's an example of extremist jews spying, cyber stalking and harassing people WITHOUT PENALTY, ruining the lives of college students for protesting a genocide and racking up 200 Million dollars in legal settlements. Even the vice president commented on it..yet no penalties and she's live on X making threats even now.
https://x.com/JDVance/status/1990124319989805538?s=20
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
