Wikipedia editors have deleted the entry on the Muslim Brotherhood's memorandum, which states the plan to “destroy and annihilate Western civilization from within.”
A few lines have been moved to the Brotherhood article, which in effect emphasizes charity rather than terrorism.
Wow, shocking!
Bluethricecreamman, the editor who requested the article's deletion, is a pro-Hamas contributor who removed significant content from the “Antisemitic trope” article and redefined the “Zionism” article. He openly supports the annihilation of Israel.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Wikipedia's attempt to censor threats to Israel while promoting anti-Israel rhetoric
A deletion attempt targets the well-sourced article Destruction of Israel in Iranian Policy, highlighting a double standard, given the unchecked spread of biased anti-Israel articles.
The fact that an article discussing Iran's policy to annihilate Israel is debated, while numerous articles amplifying anti-Israel accusations remain untouched, or curated, including sick articles as Comparisons between Israel and Nazi Germany, reveals a profound imbalance.
Instead of clearly identifying regimes that openly incite genocide, the platform is being manipulated to obscure their rhetoric, all while Israeli actions are dissected, condemned, and exaggerated across countless entries.
Ah, Wikipedia! The days when you were considered an unbiased fountain of human knowledge are long gone. As we learned from the courageous journalist @NoraBussigny, who infiltrated a "neutrality" training by the Palestine Emergency Collective, the lessons that led to the hijacking of English @Wikipedia through manipulation and deceit are now being applied to French Wikipedia.
Following is a recap of the bias and propaganda techniques used by the group.
🧵
Neutrality: The Perfect Cloak for Bias
Wikipedia loves neutrality, which makes it the ideal place for savvy activists to slip in their own agenda. The trick? Look neutral, but spin the facts so your side comes out smelling like roses. Want to promote a pro-Palestinian narrative? Just frame it as impartial—easy peasy.
Pro Tip: “Neutrality” is just the best cover for pushing a Hamas agenda while playing the victim.
2. Pseudonyms: Because Who Needs Accountability?
The best way to influence Wikipedia without getting caught? Go incognito.
Activists are taught to create fake profiles, so their political motives are hidden while they quietly edit away. Nothing says "reliable contributor" like a random username and zero transparency.
Pro Tip: Anonymity + frequency of edits = secret influence.