A new study on 40+ European countries found women increasingly want men to share child care and housework equally—but men's attitudes have barely budged. In countries where this gap was widest, both birth rates and female employment were lower.
"This was definitely not well-documented, not much attention has been paid to it," the study's lead author told me. A Norwegian demographer put it more bluntly: "I've been screaming that we need more research about men for the last 20 years." (1/2)
There's a lot of reluctance to—and frustration with—studying men and masculinity in particular. But avoiding it won't make problems go away.
I wrote about why this all matters, not just for birth rates, but for gender equality and relationships
My goal as a journalist is to report carefully on the best, most practical social policy ideas that can change the world, and this is easily the most exciting one I’ve had the opportunity to cover this year.
I hope you'll read it 🧵↓
In Bogotá they're trying to do something tricky: elevate both care work and caregivers, while also saying, “You shouldn’t have to be doing this so much — you deserve a full life beyond caring for kids, for aging relatives, for your partner."
Bogotá has opened 25 "care blocks" since 2020 — neighborhood hubs where women can hand off laundry, see a therapist, finish their education, join a fitness class or just rest, while their kids or elderly relatives are cared for nearby.
I’m seeing a lot of lefties talking about a failure to appeal to the working class but I think we should be more specific about some of the tensions embedded in this conversation, and I’m going to start with one of Biden’s signature policies - the expanded child tax credit /1
The expanded CTC passed was part of the pandemic relief program, and delivered hundreds of dollars into parents’ bank accounts every month in 2021, ultimately helping 65 million children and keeping 3.7 million of them out of poverty /2
Renewing and extending it was something progressive organizations, the Biden admin, and the Democratic Party invested a lot of political capital in. There were also dozens of articles in elite publications about how the policy was effective and powerful. I wrote about the research showing its benefit to families /3
if you consciously hide relevant information or avoid salient topics because you worry readers will do the wrong thing with it, assume it will backfire. people will stop paying attention to you, and they’ll turn elsewhere for information. (2/4)
Do journalists make daily decisions about what to include + cover? yes! But readers generally expect you to do that fairly. If they start to realize they’re not getting a reasonably fair picture, they’ll act accordingly. Assuming they won't realize is assuming they're dumb. (3/4)
when Republicans like Youngkin talk about banning teaching CRT, they are saying among other things that they won't support teaching that America is fundamentally racist, that some people are inherently disadvantaged/oppressed, advantaged, oppressive/1
note here he claims he supports teaching 'dark parts' of U.S. history. (does he mean it? devil's in detail of vague intimidating statutes) but should be noted that many progressives have responded to CRT attacks precisely by saying GOP wants to avoid teaching dark history /2
the CDC school guidance convo is a lot. Those who overstated "the science” for months are frustrated that the new guidelines don't really endorse what they thought was basically fact. And it seems to be dawning on others that there's good-faith debate among experts re: standards?
It's legit to disagree with, or question the CDC! I question why they didn't focus much on ventilation. But that doesn't mean they're "covering for the unions" (jesus christ). It also might mean that experts you see always quoted in media have a POV that merits scrutiny too
we would probably also have slightly less confusion right now if outlets hadn't covered the JAMA viewpoint article released in January like it was new CDC guidance
Just to be clear, despite framing, this was not new CDC guidance. It was covering an article written by epidemiologists affiliated with CDC, but the Biden admin recently directed the ED and HHS to issue school reopening guidance, and this is not that /2
I haven't interviewed Dr. Honein, but if I do, I would ask her the following questions, which were not addressed in this 1349-word JAMA article. (Which is fine! But needs to be stated this was not an exhaustive summary of all the relevant research)/3 jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…