Jean Hatchet Profile picture
Dec 9 70 tweets 28 min read Read on X
Look at point 152 about Upton. He was told he wasn't a woman. Which he already knew. HIs response was to crash out to another woman.

This is how they manipulate women. Get amongst us crying about their bullshit when called out. None of this is true. He's a 6 foot odd bruiser lying his bollocks off.Image
and then Upton deliberately found a woman to go into the changing room with ... asking a woman to "protect him" from another woman. Dividing women up. This is how they do it - get women feeling sorry for them and mark out women who are good and bad according to who believes them.Image
At 171.
Upton should not find it "unexpected" for Sandie Peggie to tell him he's a man. He's a man. He knows he's a man.

He's a doctor and doesn't find "chromosomes" offensive he finds women pointing out he's a liar annoying because she should be playing along like all the other women.

Sandie Peggie should have been screaming the place down not offering him legitimate examples of men like him.Image
At 175.

Upton has successfully turned women against women - partly using his manipulative crying bullshit but also by using his doctor privilege. All us docs against the uppity little nurse.

This is just as disgusting and infuriating as at the time of the trial. Hearing how women did this to Sandie Peggie is as bad as him. We know these men manipulate but women backing and believing them are willing idiots in their own oppression.Image
at 184.

The women flock to support the man against a woman and are "sad" they can't speak to him.

If you challenge a man in a female workplace he will cry to other women until they lose their minds rushing to back him. Part of the reason women do it is our unacknowledged internalised misogyny. Men like Upton have, over Millenia, groomed women to hate other women. We live in competition with each other.

(We see this replicated even in our own movement. If a man says a woman is bad - the other women lose their minds supporting him).Image
199.

Sandie Peggie is ambushed by other women in order to be slapped with a suspension. Then a couple of men join in with those first women to support the man pretending to be a woman. He has to be reassured throughout this process. He must have been laughing his cock off at such power over a woman and with such willing puppets.Image
203.

"alleged unwanted behaviours"

Of course a man pretending to be a woman doesn't want to be called a man. Tough shit. He is. Being told you're lying when you know you're lying is rough. It isn't discrimination or harassment.

The way Upton pushed this through, using other women, and now has skipped off laughing is ridiculous. This judgement is insane to read. I hope this judge struggles to sleep.Image
210-212

Looks how they build on the bullying. The man receives even more overt support and this has to be stressed. Only his protected characteristic is part of the "incident" and the characteristic of "sex" completely irrelevant.

The lies about Sandie go unchecked. I am glad the harassment part of her case succeeded but this is clear discrimination and victimisation of a woman. How did this part fail? What was the judge unclear on and why?Image
224.

The "investigation" hadn't taken place but he is reassured that Peggie's legitimately calling him a man is "unacceptable" often by NHS Fife.

When women are marked out by men as witches - all that's left to do is gather the sticks to burn under them. These witch finders did just that.Image
248.

It was too "difficult" for women to tell a man to keep out of a women's changing room. They preferred instead to allow him to keep pretending on different shifts and putting other women at risk and without adequate privacy and dignity. Thank god there are Sandie Peggies in the world who are brave enough to be the ONLY sane female voice and stick to it even under pressure.Image
249.

Lottie Myles then snitched on Sandie for not being willing to lie about a man.

All of these women know he's a man and none of them as brave as Sandie so would rather "burn the witch" than be the next on the fire. Image
277.

Note Upton's language - the "sorry not sorry" approach is bullying.

He is telling her "there is nothing you can do about this"

It is faux meekness with full knowledge he can punish Sandie for her resistance. Which he did.

Vengeance on women is baked into these men. It's why they throw on the "woman" disguise.Image
277 contd

Upton knows exactly how to "resolve the situation" but he means in his favour. He knows what he is going to do which is report her and he did.

Refusing to leave a woman's space when you are asked is deliberate intimidation. No "sorry" makes that refusal any less intimidating.Image
304.

Sandie Peggie is damned if she leaves the changing room because a man is in it, but also if she stays when a man is in it.

This really is the ducking stool trial isn't it?

She's a witch if she does, she's a witch if she doesn't. Image
311.

Reeking of male entitlement and the superior attitude of male medics.

"I have complained about a woman and that should be sufficient"

"Madwoman in the attic" tactics were similar. There was never a need for a man to prove his wife was mad before she was committed/locked up in the attic. Nothing changes down the ages.Image
319-321

Only Sandie Peggie was gagged.

Don't tell anyone is the tactic of abuse. Image
333.

If a man is in a woman's changing room, where he should not be, whether HE is wearing clothes or not is utterly irrelevant. Whether SHE is wearing clothes or not is utterly irrelevant. Only she should be there. Image
335.

"No one cares what you have to say Sandie. Only that you said the wrong thing to a man and we can't have that." Image
344.

Further charge of misgendering suddenly added.

Calling a man a man is not an act of "misconduct" - it is obligatory if you don't want to show your brains have fallen out. Image
347.

Calling a weirdo a weirdo is not a hate crime either. Here's to all the women who can correctly identify a weirdo to their friends. 🥂 Image
354.

Sandie Peggie was told that despite finding she had done nothing wrong - it was her duty to find a way to escape a man in her changing room or at least that she should know how to be nice to him to keep him calm. Image
359

In a legal judgement there is a fundamental misunderstanding that men who get themselves a pair of fake tits have changed sex. Sex doesn't depend on "physical attributes". It's a biological reality. A woman with no womb is still a woman. Image
365

What Upton says here is that he cannot make Sandie Peggie validate him. He knows she isn't going to play along like everyone else. Of course this makes him more furious than he can admit. Vengeance will follow such an act for most women who do it. We have to keep doing it. Don't look at them. Don't acknowledge them. Do dismiss them. Do be hostile. They are humiliating women when they pretend to be us and they don't deserve us to be kind while they do it.Image
372,

The judgement can't use the terms "male" and "female" even when discussing male violence against women. Regarding lack of evidence - Clare Dimyon has provided analysis of trans offending before and I don't know why it wasn't offered here. womenarehuman.com/sexual-offendi…Image
381

The judgement reminds women that part of our sex is that we have long hair, wear dresses, have a necklace on. Check yourselves for your womanising. You don't want to get it wrong.

This judgement is NUTS Image
382.

Luckily it is here clarified that if you have short hair you aren't trying to be a man so that's a relief. Image
629.

Sandie Peggie sometimes went into the toilet to change so she could always have gone there and she is 'not credible" when she says she doesn't want to as a way of keeping a man out of her changing room.

No woman should HAVE to use a toilet in changing room. She should be able to decide on a whim. She could dance in and out half naked between the two if she likes. Because she has a right to use both. A man like Upton should not be allowed near either.Image
630

The court found Sandie Peggie "not credible" because she allegedly knew Isla Bryson was a rapist and pretended she didn't.

Peggie was well aware her GC views were on trial and that she was being persecuted - of COURSE she might have tried to make herself seem less informed. This is a version of a woman trying to make herself smaller so she won't be harmed.

Many women fighting for their rights have to sometimes soften what they are saying so they aren't smashed to pieces as "TERF". Of course Sandie tried to protect herself from that.Image
632

The judgement decides Sandie Peggie is transphobic for accurately describing a man as having a beard and putting on a silly voice. He is a man who has a beard coming through and if she thinks he has a pathetic voice that's an opinion. None of this is transphobia.

Regarding calling him "it"... if a man is lying to a woman about his sex and invading her changing space I think she can call him whatever she likes and "it" is pretty mild.Image
633.

The court bizarrely finds that Peggie is guilty of personal attack. She calls Upton a weirdo WHEN HE ISN'T THERE and because she thinks he behaves weirdly.

He is a man pretending to be a woman and expecting everyone to believe him. That is weird. He is a weirdo.

The judge said it was meant to offend. Remember this was not something Upton could have heard or known about.

Does this mean any conversation we have about someone offends them even if they aren't present and don't know about it?Image
634

Holds that those of us who are dismissive of the protected category of "gender assignment" can't be called "transphobic" or lacking credibility ... only because "transphobic" isn't written into law.

However the sooner GA is removed as a legal reality the better and women should campaign for this. Now that's really dismissive of it.Image
637

Luckily - despite a warning that it isn't very nice - the judgement finds that a woman can't be held responsible for the shit her husband says or the things she says about her own family in a PRIVATE conversation that have nothing to do with a Giant Fucking Man pretending to be a woman.Image
642

The judge picks a side.

"They were both saying different things but we prefer to believe the man."

The man pretending to be a woman. The man lying about himself every day? That is who you find credible? Not the woman saying he shouldn't be there when she takes her clothes off.Image
648

Sandie Peggie was alone in her bravery in saying the man Upton shouldn't be in the changing room and that she felt intimidated and so ... she was literally left shouting for justice alone. This is why women MUST back up the brave woman. Don't assume she can carry it. She didn't. A judge used it against her. A judge could use your staying quiet against another woman.Image
649.

The judge concluded that if a woman says men agree with her about men not using the women's changing room - firstly she had better know their second names - secondly it doesn't matter because it doesn't affect them. Only one man is relevant and it's the one saying he's a woman.Image
652

The judgement makes it clear that one woman alone is not enough to claim a disadvantage for women as a whole if a man is using their changing rooms. One woman should be enough. One woman saying "no' shouldn't be needed at all because he shouldn't be there. Image
654

The judge concludes that it is unlikely that Sandie Peggie did a bad nursing job and put patients at risk as Upton had suggested/possibly lied about but in some way this is not evidence of his harassment of her. Just brushed past. Image
663

If you want to help a woman with a case you are going to have to be brave enough to put your name to it or it will dismissed. Image
666

If you are supportive of the truth - that men pretending to be women are NOT women - but you want to keep yourself safe you will condemn woman trying to fight for your rights to being called a liar. Stand up for other women or watch them fail when they try to stand up for your rights.Image
668

By contrast the judge found the man dressed up as a woman and pretending to have changed sex - not to be a liar at all. In fact he was really believable. All the people in court were mean to him when they called him a man. It was very hard for him but he was stunning and brave to bear it.

This judgement is ridiculous. I may have already said that.Image
669

The Judge believes the man because he spoke calmly and all he wanted was to make the woman get on her knees and say sorry before he continued accessing women's spaces and making them uncomfortable. That's ALL! Image
670

The judge implies Upton is nicer because he didn't try to have Sandie Peggie sacked. Bubbling under this is the suggestion that he could have done.

Also it ignores the fact that he gave evidence - found unreliable - that she was a bad nurse at times because she wouldn't look at him or do shit for him. Clearly he was still VERY NICE when he did this.Image
672

Judge : Upton might have made up some evidence in his phone afterwards but we still think he wasn't lying.

Quick to believe Sandie Peggie lacks credibility but believe any old shit the man does. Image
678

Jaw on the floor here. Upton wasn't lying ... it was an honest lie. Because he was upset. So giving honest evidence was hard.

Sandie Peggie through ... oh she's always lying, she's not just upset. Image
687

The judge says that even if Upton produced no evidence for his claim that Peggie treated patients poorly, even though he didn't complain formally and only retrospectively - he wasn't doing this to harm Sandie Peggie.

Bullshit. This is an exercise in Patriarchal fuckery. Image
695

What the fuck am I reading?

The Judge concludes that even though there was no evidence for what Upton alleged against Sandie Peggie in order to discredit her - he believed it was true and so he wasn't making it up to damage her.

Has my brain slipped sideways? This is how her claim failed?Image
701

Naomi Cunningham said Upton was a man. Upton said he was a woman.

The Judge - well.... because of FWS Cunningham is technically right but .... Upton sincerely BELIEVED he was a woman. Poor thing. Image
702

Upton - found credible earlier and definitely to be trusted - lies here about what sex is and says doctors (which he is) aren't reliable when they decide the sex of a baby. The judge has to reluctantly(?) go against him because of FWS judgement. Image
703

The judge concludes that even though Upton doesn't know which sex a baby is - he's definitely not a liar and prefers his evidence to Sandie Peggie the woman who does know what sex a baby is. Image
712

On whether Elaine Davison trying to punish Sandie Peggie the judge decided no. Even though Davison clearly said "I didn't like her tone". Image
719

Many of us remember Isla Bumba giving evidence. She was a national joke for days because she didn't know what her own sex was, or the sex of any other person. She became a noun. "Doing a Bumba". A verb "to Bumba".

This is no longer funny.

The judge found that she was "credible" and "honest".Image
721.

Isla Bumba is judged to be a credible as a witness even though she had no memory of very much at all. Including what she had seen. Image
727

This is very muddled. Seems to be saying that even though Bumba knew Fife didn't have a policy on trans- she adhered to a policy they didn't have and would have done the same for any man pretending to be a woman not just Upton. Image
728

The next witness for Fife is found credible. Malone, like Bumba cannot remember much, specifically a risk assessment document. She knows she gave advice based on something she doesn't remember seeing.

The judge is believing people who claim to have virtually no accurate memory of the situation. Rather than Sandie Peggie who remembers events really well.Image
733

Also believed is Senior Nurse Joanne Curran. She claims words are used by Sandie Peggie which make her appear aggressive. The word "confronted" becomes the central issue not the invasion of women's space by a man.

Her betrayal of other women on display when she tells Peggie she must put up with him there or go somewhere else and a judge is fine with this.

This is discrimation against a woman and in favour of a man. Discrimination was dismissed in the Judgement.Image
734
Curran also doesn't like Sandie Peggie's tone. She hasn't objected to a man in her changing room in sufficiently meek manner. The judge says this is only an allegation but accepts it nevertheless as valid. Image
735

Curran also snitches on Sandie P for using the toilet to change sometimes. If a woman once makes a choice she is forever committed to to that choice, even if the man in her changing room is the one forcing her to make it. Peggie had every right to move between changing room and toilet.Image
741

Dr Searle is found credible and reliable despite being close to Upton and supportive of him. Image
742

Searle - close to Upton - pushes for Peggie to remain suspended. Searle admits not keeping the details confidential.

Still this is accepted as "credible" by the judge. Image
744

Dr Searle - close to Upton - said that it was "hate" for Peggie to call Upton a man. That discussing Chromosomes is offensive.

When did doctors forget their training to the point that saying "chromosomes" is offensive and why is a Judge accepting such a person's evidence? Image
745

Mentioning Isla Bryson is regularly used as a test of TERFs for "bigotry" even though this is a correct comparison by Peggie. Bryson is lying about being a woman to gain access to a female prison, Upton is lying about being a woman to gain access to Peggie's changing room.

A judge accepts Searle's condemnation of Peggie on this basis and .... once again ... her tone.Image
746

Almost unbelievable that the judge writes that Kate Searle is definitely biased in favour of Upton but nevertheless is "compelling" and "reliable". This judge is displaying their own flaws in ... well.... judgement repeatedly. Judge also admits that their own views on the appropriateness of Sandie Peggie's tone and manner influence them. This is all madness.Image
747

Even though Searle backs everything Upton says and is biased due to relationship the judge accepts the account of Upton's level of "upset" at being told he is a man who cannot be in a woman's changing room. Searle throws her arms around the man - rather than Peggie - and yet it is not a conspiracy.

Women - please do stop comforting men who lie to you and would happily see you harassed by your employer if you were the one saying they aren't a woman. Searle is a traitor to women. Don't be like Kate Searle.Image
748

Judge acknowledges a cover up ... but absolves Kate Searle. She was crying in evidence and trying to save her own skin - judge allows her to and deems "no conspiracy". Image
763

Judge Kemp is astonishing here. He allows for Lindsey Nicholl saying Peggie should be struck off and still finds her credible - because Lindsey thinks Peggie is a racist and also said "weirdo" so it doesn't matter.

The lesson here is that if you have views contrary to those who want you dismissed from your job - a judge will support you when you give evidence against them.Image
787

Judge sifts the Supreme Court judgement in order to announce that Upton is a man.

We already knew that judge and Sandie Peggie knew it and said it.

What's the "but" I can hear coming down the line....? Image
865

Judge concludes that even if "female staff only" is on the door it does not constitute a "sex-based rule".

So stating clearly that men aren't allowed doesn't mean NHS Fife mean that men aren't allowed.

Boundaries aren't boundaries. Women have nothing to fight men with. Image
866

Further - a sign that says female does not mean female. It can mean men who lie about being female. The employer decides who they mean by "female" and they can adapt it as they wish which they did. So the claimant understanding what female means - is irrelevant if the employer gives permission to a man. Biological reality does not override that permission.Image
870

Judge Kent discusses the Forstater ruling for the purpose of dismissing it. This was always a risk around the "misgendering" contemplation in Forstater. Here we see what it was. It does not offer complete protection in of accusations of discrimination in the workplace when you call a man a man. Sandie Peggie was unprotected by Forstater.Image
872-873

The Judge decides that both beliefs - SP's that Upton is a man, and Upton's belief that he is a woman are protected. Supreme Court ruling does not affect this. Misgendering This is quite shocking to a lot of us.

Nothing has been clearer than that neither judgement has effectively protected Sandie Peggie in this case.

We must therefore work to repeal the GRA.

FWS and Forstater were hard won. They are not enough. It is what it is. We need to repeal the GRA.Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jean Hatchet

Jean Hatchet Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JeanHatchet

Aug 25
The Sam Nicoresti win at Edinburgh Festival is more sinister than it would at first seem. If this man will now be catapulted to comedy stardom. whilst pretending to be a woman, he needs investigating for that grift but also for his views about women.

Let's start with his joking about women's sexuality. Here Sam discusses how he made his girlfriend a lesbian with his choice to be a woman. Hstyle routine in 'Wokeflake' (which was the basis for his award-winning Edinburgh show) you can see that he actively and viciously hates women and in particular TERF women. This is hidden away inside jokes. Flimsily.

A thread. Including clips.

Let's start with joking about women's sexuality. Here Sam discusses how he made his girlfriend a lesbian with his choice to be a woman. He is explicit about making her stay with him by emotional manipulation.
The whole video is full of intense woman-hating. It is hard to select the bits that are the worst. Much of the hatred and ridicule of women's objections to trans ideological impositions on women's rights are "cleverly hidden" inside a "joke". It is vile.

Here Sam tells women that we don't care about male violence. In fact we CAUSE male violence. That we never discuss it where it matters and that we don't talk about male violence in the home or in the streets.
There is an attack on JK Rowling for pretending to be a man, which dismisses gender critical thinking.
Read 7 tweets
Mar 26
I visited @VirginActiveUK to ask about their single sex changing room policy and to see if they let men in. Answer - yes. Any man if he says he’s a woman. However he’s dressed as long as he says he’s a woman. Or even if he doesn’t.
I was due to meet female @VirginActiveUK staff “S” to show me round. She substituted a male and a “shadow”. I asked the very nice young lad whether he would be able to show me around the female facilities. He said “no but I can let you have a look around.” I said I had questions
He said that was fine he could answer them. I asked if a female member might be able to show me round them. He said he would fetch “S”. It was “S” I was originally supposed to be meeting. “S” asked a few basics and I said I was most interested in the female facilities
Read 19 tweets
Mar 26
I’ve come to ask some questions about their single-sex changing rooms. Nice day to poke at policy. 🕶️🌞 Image
I was due to meet female @VirginActiveUK staff “S” to show me round. She substituted a male and a “shadow”. I asked the very nice young lad whether he would be able to show me around the female facilities. He said “no but I can let you have a look around.” I said I had questions
He said that was fine he could answer them. I asked if a female member might be able to show me round them. He said he would fetch “S”. It was “S” I was originally supposed to be meeting. “S” asked a few basics and I said I was most interested in the female facilities.
Read 18 tweets
Feb 24
Tomorrow @twelve0fiveUK will protest the @ECB_cricket ahead of England's cricket match against the Taliban's team Afghanistan in @ICC Championship.

4pm. Lords Cricket Ground. London. The Grace Gate entrance.

If you can't come, but want to support the women of Afghanistan please do the following:

PLEASE ONLY DO ANY OF THESE ACTIONS TOMORROW FROM 4PM - 25TH FEBRUARY.

1. Post a picture of you with an A4 message written directly to the women of Afghanistan, in the hope that somehow they will hear about it, or see it, and know they and their suffering are not being ignored as the men play cricket.

Please use the hashtag #DearWomenOfAfghanistan - example below.Image
Please amplify tweets about the protest if you see them. Use the hashtags and tag in @twelve0fiveUK
#DearWomenOfAfghanistan
#BoycottAfghanCricket
#LetUsExist
During the protest and throughout the match which is at 9am on Wednesday 26th February Please post directly at @ECB_cricket and @englandcricket the message

"TaliBAN them"

and "Support women of Afghanistan"
Read 6 tweets
Jan 13
Dear @ECB_cricket my timeline has been targeted by Taliban bots for over 48 hours, including a death threat, because I’m saying the things they don’t want the world to see. That they don’t want YOU to see. Listen carefully.

The Taliban appear to have sent out an army of bots to reaffirm their propaganda and lies, which have now been exposed. They’ve been trying to convince you, and us all, that they want to ban cricket, with the Afghan Cricket Team seemingly complicit in this lie. In reality, the Taliban are using the Afghan cricket team to polish up their international reputation and gain support among the local male population. Afghan men want to play and watch cricket and when Taliban allow this THEY gain support along with the cricket team.

This Taliban PR machine desperately wants you to field an England team against the Afghan team, because if the Taliban make you do this, and are able to prevent the boycott, they are heroes to their people. They can declare they defeated the West, they delivered the cricket, and become heroic champions to the men of Afghanistan, who we have seen, in targeted tweets, are begging to be given their cricket.

The message to Afghan women is loud and it is callous. If England play against Afghanistan, you legitimise the Taliban and allow them to tell women, “Look, no one cares about what we do to you. England cares more about their cricket games than you. NO ONE is coming to help you'”.

When you turn a deaf ear to requests to boycott the England v Afghanistan cricket match, you stand with the men of the Taliban and every atrocity they commit against Afghan women. You and the Taliban are shoulder to shoulder at the point England play Afghanistan, and that shameful act will follow you around for decades to come.

That is the point when you turn your backs on Afghan women being dragged into sporting stadiums only to be stoned and flogged. When you deliver these men their cricket, you tell and show those women that the world doesn’t mind, or care, if they beat and stone women to death and that no one wants them to stop treating women like lesser humans.

You should be outraged, but instead you refuse to condemn the men destroying women’s lives. There is no distance you can establish between the Afghan men’s cricket team and the Taliban to make this a comfortable decision which you can morally defend. The team appear in adverts with the Taliban. The Taliban ARE Afghanistan, and the team ARE Afghanistan. You can’t split the two.

The team has in the past celebrated a Taliban takeover of Afghanistan. If you refuse to boycott the England v Afghanistan fixture, you’re refusing to condemn the Taliban’s treatment of women; you’re telling them they can treat women as they wish, and the world won’t mind.

The regime-peddled lie is that the Afghan team “give hope” to Afghans globally. This has now been written into a manipulative petition. What “hope”? The only thing the Afghan Cricket team competing achieves is to increase the Taliban's popularity! What hope do you offer for the women banned from going to university or to work, who can’t speak to each other or read aloud in their own homes? Do you want to enhance the Taliban’s popularity and kill off any shred of spirit and hope the oppressed women hold, that ANYONE cares about them?

If you wave an England team onto the pitch against Afghanistan, you offer a rubber stamp to Taliban brutality. The world will see you do it.

Where is your compassion? Your humanity? Do you care more about the money you get from tv rights than you do about women living lives of torture at the hands of barbarians? We know you've prevented English players from playing before, when it was costing you money. So, we know you can do it if you want. We can only assume you refuse to take the English team out because it will cost you money.

You're selling your integrity and your soul. You either stand with women, or you stand with the Taliban.

Make the right choice or when those women are stoned to death it is YOU who will also have blood on your hands. No money will wash it clean.

(A number of screenshots follow which ought to shame you into withdrawing the English Cricket Team.)
Here women of Afghanistan tell you the need support.
And here... their desperation obvious.
Read 11 tweets
Oct 26, 2024
Last night we decided to do a very quiet and peaceful action. We ended up having tomato ketchup thrown all over us, drinks thrown at us, threatened by bar staff and the police called to arrest us. I wondered how such a quiet thing would go. Here is how… Image
The idea was to see reactions in a normal bar on truthful statements about the reality of sex versus the nefarious gender. We weren’t saying anything. We weren’t giving our views out loud. We just wondered what people would do if they looked at a quiet truth written on boards. Image
The first bar we sat at a table next to a middle aged man. We got a drink and sat chatting about stuff. We put 3 signs around us without saying anything. Some curious looks, some photos taken from a distance. Much as expected. Then a man came up to say he agreed with them. Image
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(