1. For at least 10 years, Pepsi has conspired with Walmart to force up grocery prices. That’s the shocking evidence made public today in an unsealed FTC lawsuit. The suit was dropped in May by @AFergusonFTC just before it was to be un-redacted. We went to court to get it unsealed & won.
2. The evidence we can now see demolishes the core argument made by opponents of the Robinson-Patman Act. They claim not enforcing the law has led to lower prices. But this new material shows the opposite: Pepsi forced all grocers besides Walmart to raise their prices.
3. Pepsi monitors prices at Walmart's competitors. If they see other grocery stores starting to match or beat Walmart on price, an alarm goes off in Pepsi and a team swings into action.
4. The examples are stunning. Here's one: Pepsi executives notice that Walmart's price gap is shrinking in its South Division. Pepsi's "Pricing Council" creates extensive plan to ensure other retailers are no longer selling Pepsi products for less than Walmart.
5. Another example involves Food Lion. Pepsi sees Food Lion as the "worst offender," because it prices Pepsi products below Walmart. So Pepsi creates a multi-year roadmap to force Food Lion to raise its prices.
6. Why does Pepsi do this? Walmart’s promise is: Keep us the king of our domain and we’ll make you the king of yours. Walmart helps Pepsi dominate the drink market in exchange for Pepsi ensuring that Walmart dominates groceries.
7. One other big reveal in the evidence is that Walmart appears to have violated the law too by pressuring Pepsi for illegal and unfair discounts.
8. I am so appalled that @AFergusonFTC dropped this case. Local independent grocery stores are being driven out of business — and their customers forced to pay higher prices — by two powerful companies who've been told, in effect, that they can violate the law with impunity.
@AFergusonFTC 9. This now-defunct case was brought by the FTC under @linamkhan with Commissioners @BedoyaUSA @RKSlaughterFTC — they deserve huge credit for this investigation and for their commitment to the law and to the fairness it proscribes.
@AFergusonFTC @linamkhan @BedoyaUSA @RKSlaughterFTC 10. There's good reason for some hope though — state AGs are starting to take a hard look price discrimination with an eye toward bring actions. And a few states, including NY, are introducing bills. Follow ILSR if you want to keep abreast! ilsr.org/independent-bu…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. Tim Muris, who held top roles at the FTC in the 1970s-80s and 2000s, has teamed up with the Competitive Enterprise Institute on a new effort to discredit and bury the Robinson-Patman Act.
Muris has a record of inventing history to support his agenda. Here are a few examples.
2. Quick background: the 1936 Robinson-Patman Act bars large retailers from using their leverage over suppliers to secure discriminatory pricing & drive smaller retailers out of business. Muris played a key role in the government’s decision to stop enforcing the law around 1980.
3. Muris’s core tale is always the same: chain retailers are bold innovators, while independents are backward holdovers. Muris frames Robinson-Patman as a law passed to protect local retailers from chain store “innovation.” But his “facts” don’t hold up.
1. Cities and states should outlaw Amazon’s latest assault on small businesses — an AI tool that scrapes their websites and creates listings of their products within the Amazon app without their consent. It’s causing huge, costly problems. This can and should be banned.
2. Last year, Amazon launched “Buy For Me.” Shoppers see AI-generated listings of items otherwise not sold on Amazon. They can click to buy them within the Amazon checkout. Amazon’s AI agent then makes the purchase on the small business's site using a auto-generated email.
3. This is being done without consent and with major harm to small brands: Amazon’s AI will sell products that are no longer in stock, in colors that do not exist, and at prices that are not the actual price. Small businesses are left with unhappy buyers and expensive returns.
1. This is now unsealed. The FTC filing shows Pepsi worked closely with Walmart to force other retailers to raise their prices on Pepsi products. The Khan-era FTC brought the case; Trump/Ferguson dropped it as “weak.” It looks anything but. It directly targets high prices.
2. The evidence shows that Pepsi punished Walmart’s competitors if they discounted Pepsi products. Pepsi would increase their wholesale cost or eliminate promotional payments to force Walmart's rival to raise its price to consumers.
3. This was done to maintain Walmart’s “price gap.” The purpose of the price gap is to provide Walmart an advantage over other retailers. Pepsi documents describe this as a “foundational commitment” that aligns with the company’s strategy.
1. ILSR has filed a motion in federal court to unseal the FTC’s antitrust complaint against PepsiCo. The case bears directly on high grocery prices & food deserts—and would've marked a crucial revival of the neglected Robinson-Patman Act. But the public may never get to see it.
2. Most of the complaint is heavily redacted, including the name of the favored retailer (reportedly Walmart). The complaint alleges that Pepsi gave a favored big-box retailer illegal price breaks — while raising prices to competing independent grocers and their customers.
3. In antitrust cases, complaints are often temporarily sealed. But courts generally move quickly to remove the redactions, so the public can see the evidence and understand what’s at stake.
1. My colleague Ron Knox just published a killer guide to resisting monopolies. It shows that fighting monopoly power isn't just a job for the government — it's something regular people can do every day in their communities and workplaces. microcosmpublishing.com/catalog/zines/…
2. Resist Monopolies! — published by the great folks at Microcosm — weaves together the stories of people across the country pushing back against corporate domination — and winning.
3. The book brilliantly connects today’s struggles to our long, rich history of anti-monopoly activism — and the heroes, then and now, leading the way. It’s an essential read. microcosmpublishing.com/catalog/zines/…
1. How strong are your state’s antitrust laws? Does your state AG have all the tools s/he needs to go after corporate abuse? What can your state legislature do to fight monopolies? ILSR has new resources for you, created by my colleague @ronmknox: ilsr.org/independent-bu…
2. Back in the 19th century, states were the first on the scene when corporations started to amass too much power. They came up with the first antitrust laws, which inspired federal law.
3. Today, states are playing a pivotal role in reviving antimonopoly law. They’re blocking mergers that would hurt workers, investigating landlord collusion to raise prices, suing to break up Big Tech, going after the PBMs that kill pharmacies, and more. ilsr.org/articles/state…