New study of national differences in groupishness: prosocial feelings only to your group (often kin) vs prosocial feelings to all (the green countries).
Treat group members better than non-members vs treating all the same.
The same map as corruption, cheating, etc.
This study uses the World Values Survey to look at three facets of groupishness (conformity, discrimination, exclusion).
The main predictors of low groupishness were (a) the cool water index (i.e. the climate of NW Europe) and (b) the Western family pattern (i.e. not living with extended kin, no cousin marriage, no polygamy, no arranged marriage).
Open access: psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2027-…
This study follows the convention of using the words individualism and collectivism. A bad misnomer.
It is not about being selfish vs cooperative!
It is about being cooperative only with one's kin and allies, while often treating others badly, vs cooperating with all.
The authors find that their I-C index correlates with the Corruption Perceptions Index at about 0.9.
So level of corruption is probably the best single indicator of level of groupishness.
Corruption is a good illustration of groupishness.
Take advantage of outsiders (rather that be prosocial towards them) by demanding bribes or embezzling common funds.
Cooperate with insiders by sharing some of those spoils.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Article on decisions that led to the Boriswave of migration in the UK.
1. Boris Johnson. Wanted to give subsidies to universities (more student visas) and low-wage employers (cheap labor).
Outright gifts to special interests.
2. Previously, the Home Office's job had been to counterbalance other departments lobbying on behalf of their associated special interest groups.
Priti Patel failed to do this. Plus, officials failed to forecast the huge surge of migrants.
Clear failure.
Lesson: There are always concentrated interests (like universities and low-wage employers) who will lobby for subsidies in the form of migrants against the public good and against clear promises by the government.
It is AD 2025 and still ONLY Europeans, Anglo settlers, East Asians and Israelis have created rich countries (over $50k per capita).
Nobody else. Absolutely none.
(Oil states don't count.)
40 years ago the rich countries were NW Europe, Anglo settler, Japan.
In the last 40 years, ONLY about 10+ countries joined their ranks, all of them in Europe, East Asia, and Israel.
Again, oil doesn't count.
This is what's called convergence in econspeak.
If only 10+ countries have achieved it, then that's just 5-10% of countries. Not very many.
The future prospects of classical liberalism:
Marian Tupy asks if mass immigration of illiberal peoples will mean the end of classical liberalism.
Tyler Cowen accepts this is a problem and says he doesn't know what to do about it.
How about ending mass immigration?
Note how evasive Cowen is:
"ponder what has gone wrong in other decisions" what other decisions?
"try to address those" address what, how?
"I don’t think you can do nothing." what can you do?
1. In 2023 an article "Black Metallurgists and the Making of the Industrial Revolution" (by Jenny Bulstrode) claimed that 18th-century English ironmaster Henry Cort stole his revolutionary ironrolling process from enslaved metalworkers in Jamaica.
2. Anton Howes in a Substack listed several claims that Bulstrode made and for which she provides no evidence.
3. Oliver Jelf then published a paper showing that not only that she provides no evidence but that the sources do not say what Bulstrode claims, i.e. that she fabricates evidence.
4. The editors of History and Technology who published Bulstrode declared their "unreserved support" for the article and defended it at length.
All that was in 2023.
5. Now Jelf has a new paper responding in detail to the editors and Bulstrode showing that she has provided no evidence for her claim of theft and on several occasions she misrepresents and misquotes the sources: