You’re moving through the woods. It’s quiet. Too quiet.
Would you recognize the signs of an enemy lying in wait, or stroll straight into their kill zone? 🧵
Reconnaissance
Reconnaissance, or recon for short, is the deliberate collection of information relating to hostile forces, terrain, and the environment that forces will be operating within. Recon’s central objective is to gather intelligence, not to engage in kinetic actions. The intelligence gained from recon operations can give smaller fighting units the tactical edge that they need to leverage against a larger, hostile force. Without recon, forces are operating blindly in an area, working against the whims of the battlespace, but when teams are operating with the intelligence gained from proper recon, they can set the terms of their fights.
Purpose of Reconnaissance.
There are five primary objectives of the recon mission and the use of recon in general. They are: gathering information on the enemy, learning the area’s terrain, providing an early warning against enemy activity, supporting operational planning, and giving a psychological edge.
When gathering information on enemy personnel, recon teams can quantify and note things such as the number of enemy personnel, their uniforms, units, weapons, locate supply lines, and even estimate morale. Recon teams also observe and note movement patterns, keeping eyes on when guard shifts change, patrol timings, and convoy schedules.
Teams that are performing terrain study, also known as area study, are identifying potential choke points, highlighting natural cover and concealment, obstacles, and defensible terrain. Teams also take note of important local resources such as water, shelter, escape routes, and in some cases even food sources.
With regards to early warnings, recon teams sweep areas to detect likely ambush locations, or even identify actively manned ambush positions, IEDs, land mines, or enemy troop concentrations prior to contact. Recon teams identifying threats before the rest of the element enters the area can save lives by having maneuver elements avoid ambushes entirely or maneuvering around area denial assets.
Operations that are planned with good area intelligence are doomed to fail. The intelligence gained by recon teams can be the difference between a successful raid or ambush or total failure. Teams that identify and locate defensive positions based on avenues of approach are spotted during recon operations. While ambushes can be conducted in an ad-hoc way, an ambush planned around good area intelligence will almost always go better than the one without.
The mind is as important of a battlefield as the physical one, the status and soundness of it influence every facet of operations from the command level to the individual. Units that know the ground they are working on and the basics about their enemy in the area will operate more confidently and effectively than those who are working in the dark, giving them a psychological boost. At the same time, an enemy that knows they’re being scouted are likely to be more paranoid and apprehensive when working in the field. Finally, leaders that are equipped with quality intelligence will make faster, and better decisions.
Recon operations are conducting much more analysis than squinting on top of a hill at an enemy base (despite what Guntubers will tell you). Proper recon is as integral to the planning and conducting of operations as well as the overall proper functioning of a unit as equipment and supplies. Reconnaissance is how the intelligence that makes or breaks plans is gathered.
Reconnaissance Mission Types.
Recon missions, as previously established, gather lots of information about operational areas, covering much more than just the simple idea of finding hostile forces. Recon operations can be conducted across long points of interest, in a specific area of interest, entire grid squares (or more), or done simply to find hostile forces in an area.
When searching along a path, trail, or other length of interest, the mission is considered route reconnaissance. Teams are in the field and inspecting roads, trails, river crossings, any type of route that humans may travel, either on foot or in vehicles. Teams in these missions are often looking for ideal ambush positions, obstacles, and IEDs. Teams can also be working to identify ideal routes for rapid exfiltration, infiltration paths, and potential supply trails or cache locations. Recon is conducted for all mission types, both constructive, such as supply line establishing, and destructive.
When inspecting a specific site such as a bridge, a compound, a village, or a natural landform, it is considered an area reconnaissance mission. During area reconnaissance missions teams are inspecting for hostile forces, potential ambush sites, searching for raid targets, or identifying where to establish observation posts and listening posts. During a patrol, landforms may be used for identifying potential patrol base locations.
Zone reconnaissance is the term used to describe sweeping entire sectors, generally with little starting intelligence. Zone reconnaissance confirms or denies enemy presence in larger swaths of land (think a 1km by 1km grid square or larger).
Finally we have force-oriented reconnaissance. Force-oriented reconnaissance is conducted to specifically locate, track, and understand any forces in an area. This is generally conducted via covert tailing or through static observation through something like an observation post.
Reconnaissance missions, no matter their type and specificity, are important to maintaining the intelligence profile on an area and should not be seen as one-off tasks. Teams need to conduct cyclical reconnaissance missions, an example of this could be before, during, and after every operation. Teams need to adopt a constant reconnaissance mindset to keep their understanding of the area up to date at all times.
Methods of Reconnaissance.
Reconnaissance operations come in many forms and are not exclusively two guys with “recce rifles” running around ridge lines while wearing $5000 in kit on camera. Recon can come in that form but it is a much more nuanced task, particularly when teams are operating in urban versus rural environments.
Teams operating in more rural environments benefit from being able to follow more doctrinal military recon missions. They can send out foot patrols, using stealth, terrain masking, and slow movement to gather intelligence and move relatively freely about an area. Teams in these theaters can also employ traditional observation posts, built to hide amongst the environment to provide constant watch on various positions. Teams can also make much easier use of drones than those operating in more urban environments. Drones can be beneficial for rapid mapping of an area but wireless options carry a very high risk of electronic detection, units should be careful to balance speed, volume, and electronic signature when employing drones. Rural teams benefit from local populations likely being more favorable to them and can more easily make use of locals, traders, and farmers as sources of routine observations of an area. Finally, teams in rural environments can more easily prioritize working in high ground, along tree lines, and in natural concealment. Teams need to be wary that recon is conducted by both sides and should keep an eye out for hostile scouts, looking for disturbed vegetation, unnatural sounds, monitoring electronic traffic if possible, and looking for hostile observation posts.
Urban teams on the other hand do not benefit from dressing in camouflage and carrying a rifle for protection. Teams working in urban environments need to practice their intelligence tradecraft, they must blend in amongst civilian populations, moving and dressing like locals with established legends (cover stories). Teams can leverage the environment for static observation by disguising observation posts in apartments, rooftops, homeless encampments, and even parked cars. Teams should be logging daily routines of everything around them: markets, foot traffic, vehicle traffic, guards, and other hostile forces. People tend to work in patterns and noting them down means they can be exploited. Teams need to be careful about using technology in these areas, cell phones can be geolocated and tracked, traffic cameras can have face scanning technology. Teams must balance the importance of the intelligence against physical and digital traces that they leave behind as well as avoiding blowing their cover by avoiding them (either by physical avoidance or disguises). Because teams are operating around more civilians, particularly ones likely viewing them less favorably, they must be careful to avoid detection and compromise from paranoid civilians.
Both the urban and rural reconnaissance teams are performing the same mission but they are conducted wildly differently. The rural team is employing more traditional military operations and equipment while the urban operation is conducted more like a Philip K. Dick flavored spy novel and may not carry any type of weapon at all. Both missions will result in the same objectives being completed, intelligence is gathered and nobody is detected.
Considerations.
The following is a series of considerations for teams and command elements to keep in mind when both planning recon missions as well as executing them. They are in no particular order and should all be kept in mind.
Teams must maintain stealth above all. Recon units benefit from being invisible, detection means the team is compromised and the mission risks failure. Light, sound, movement, signals, and scent discipline are critical to recon units in the field.
Teams should be sized appropriately for their operation. A zone reconnaissance team might be as large as 12 or more men but an area recon team can comfortably be as small as 2 men. Teams need to be small enough to conceal but large enough for security. Roles should be designated amongst the team members: observer, recorder, and security. Roles can be rotated to prevent fatigue.
Teams need to be lightweight. Their equipment should be focused primarily on the tools they need for their mission such as optics, comms, recording tools, drones, etc. Weapons should be minimized and kits kept as light as possible. Heavy weights result in slower and louder movements.
Reports should be standardized, ideally using the SALUTE system for hostile forces, covering the size, activity, location, unit, time, and equipment of the observation. Information that is noted or sent must be clear, useful, and brief.
Patterns should be avoided by teams that regularly go out. Routes should be changed as should hours of observation. Leverage low visibility such as dawn, dusk, or night for movements if possible.
Teams need relief. Long hours in observation posts burn men out, regular shift changes can keep teams from becoming blind to potential threats. Consider keeping logs for continuity, particularly in observation and listening posts.
Have an emergency SOP. Plans for compromise that escalate based on the threat. Was the team seen? Are they being chased or engaged? Keep it realistic, fighting through detection works if it’s one hostile actor but if it’s a squad, breaking contact and exfiltrating is ideal. Teams communicating over radios should have signal codes to relay what their current situation is.
Exfiltration should be planned with multiple exits: primary, alternative, contingency, and emergency. Rally points should be established ahead of time in case the team must split up to break contact.
Integrate with communications. Whether by radio burst, field telephone, hand delivery of notes, or one time pad encrypted messages inside of images, teams need to have a plan to deliver their findings to command and intelligence elements, lest the entire mission have been for naught.
Common Pitfalls.
Following the same layout as the previous section, this will be a series of common failures and pitfalls for both planning and the execution of these types of missions.
Turning recon into combat is a mistake and should be avoided at all costs. Every shot fired, even suppressed, risks blowing the entire operation. Recon isn’t a firefight and you aren’t playing Metal Gear Solid.
Carrying too much gear makes units slower, heavier, louder, and more fatigued. More spartan kits, mean units can operate longer in the field and move more effectively.
Vague reports are not beneficial to anyone. “saw some guys,” doesn’t help. Details matter for both teams in the field as well as the command and intelligence guys back home.
Poor camouflage such as optics without killflashes, pale white skin in a forest environment, breaking noise discipline, can compromise positions and team members.
Urban overconfidence, in that teams think they blend in but obviously do not. Locals notice outsiders pretty quickly. Blending is a skill that needs to be practiced. Dressing in 5.11 tactical khakis, UnderArmor Valsetz boots, and a flannel button up doesn’t help you hide too well in a place like Minneapolis.
Not having an exfil plan can spell doom for a recon team. If the team is compromised and their initial infiltration route is blocked off, they risk complete destruction.
Complacency. Complacency gets people killed. Breaking light, sound, scent, or any other discipline is how units get discovered. Complacency can be partially mitigated by preventing long surveillances and keeping teams fresh.
Failure to share. If intelligence isn’t passed along, the team went out and risked their necks for nothing. Intelligence should be shared according to the operation plan.
A Quick Note.
Before wrapping this up, I want to make a quick note about recon missions. They aren’t exclusively operations done in a vacuum. Reconnaissance can integrate and hybridize with other tasks to increase the likelihood of positive outcomes for different mission types. Examples of this include recon patrols that act as eyes for a main force, observation posts providing static coverage as part of a perimeter defense plan, and recon teams scouting for potential patrol bases or launching from patrol bases to extend reach.
Closing Thoughts.
Reconnaissance operations are operations focused on patience, detail, and discipline. It’s not built around an idea of a “recce rifle” where you wait to run an ambush with your bros. Recon provides friendly forces, in particular smaller and irregular ones, with their greatest advantage possible, foresight. Without reconnaissance forces are operating blindly in the field, they are forced to be reactive, and they are left vulnerable. Reconnaissance is not flashy, it is not glamerous, and is generally not exciting but it is a pivotal part of winning conflicts. A quote that I plagiarized from an unknown source once said, “knowledge before action. Action only when necessary.”
Act accordingly.
Thank you everyone for checking this post out! This is a re-release of an older piece and a teaser for my upcoming book that is releasing at the end of the month!
Pieces like this get deboosted in the algorithm so interactions like comments and quote tweets helps a lot!
If you are interested in my other written works, the highights tab of my profile has over 100 feature length pieces!
If you want to support me, check out my books on amazon!
🧵"durr hurr nostalgia glasses make you think past good when past bad"
No. This country was a different place just 20 years ago.
Things that matter like the actual culture, social cohesion, economics and demographics of the nation have all changed. Even the still living older generations have lost it.
Our culture has been stripped by hyper consumerism, cynicism, and a loss of purpose.
Religion was torn asunder and replaced with three mainstream options of nihilistic atheism with a vaguely Christian morality, a strange republic-protestant-Israeli hybrid complete with worship of political figures as living saints, and moralistic therapeutic deism wherein the default belief is "nothing - but spiritual" and morals are built on what feels good.
All 3 of these primary paths lead to the same result: A perverted worldview twisted more by politics than actual empathy for their fellow man.
The Christian roots of this nation have been poisoned on purpose to make the people forget or disdain their heritage. For example, the Christian holidays that this nation celebrates have become nothing more than excuses to rack up debt to show off how good of a spender you are.
Rather than achieving the Neitzchean goal of the Ubermensch after the death of God, we've found new gods in politicians, nations, and purchases.
To replace meaning, we sought the hedonic treadmill, or more accurately we were given it. Endlessly spending money on the next impulsive trend to feel better.
Edward Bernays invented consumerism in the ashes of World War 1. He felt that if men were occupied with the collection of things, they'd lose the impulse to fight one another, achieving peace.
He was right that it occupies the mind, by endlessly searching out the next purse, the next watch, the newest rifle, the latest and coolest *thing* we stop occupying our minds with anything else.
When God is distant and the new Marvel movie so close, which is more likely to draw you in?
I'm not a religious zealot, in fact I'm someone who is rather skeptical and struggles with faith, but I can tell you that a culture without a common faith, even if practiced only culturally, is one that is easy to break a part.
How have the Jewish people survived since their diaspora? A culture that hinged on religion that they clung to in foreign lands.
In the early 1990s approximately 90% of this country called itself Christian in some form. Now it's barely 60%.
When a people are broken. You can convince them to do anything. They'll desperately cling to meaning and meaning is whatever you sell them, whether it be garbage to extract more wealth, bizarre religious promises to wage wars, or replacing their morality with your own for political gain.
Economics.
Economically, this country is in worse shape now than it was in nearly any other period in history. Wages are stagnant, inflation is proving impossible to control due to infinite printing, and the wealth gap is increasing.
The problem is so bad that the top 10% of "earners" are doing over 50% of all consumer spending right now. This is because the average person has much less spare income and can't afford to spend, let alone save. Consumer debt is at all time highs and climbing, with no end in sight.
This wasn't something that happened accidentally. In 2005 Citi Group wrote a massive paper foretelling of a "Plutonomy" wherein they saw a future where the average consumer contributes nothing to the economy and all economic growth was based on the spending of ultra elite spenders.
Our current predicament isnt an accident. It's on purpose. It's by design.
Is your defensive position secure, or will it collapse at first contact? 🧵
Knowing how to build a fighting position properly is a lifesaver. Here's how you do it.
Basic Fighting Positions
For as long as man has found it pertinent to kill one another, there has been a need for field construction to build defensive and offensive structures to gain an advantage over an adversary. From the siege towers of medieval Europe to the hastily built trenches of modern Ukraine, fighters have felled many trees and dug many pits to defend positions, obfuscate their location, and protect them from fire. While every rifleman is not a combat engineer, every rifleman should have a repertoire of the basic fighting positions that they can dig in the field under their belt.
Fighting positions are more than simple holes to hide in during artillery barrages. Fighting positions do provide a lot of protection from enemy fire, shrapnel from explosives, and other forms of indirect fire but they also provide an easy way to organize a team into fields and sectors of fire to overwatch large areas with little overlap. Positions can be built in a manner that allows units to defend a location of any shape or size, offering opportunities for even full 360-degree coverage if the situation demands it.
Position selection.
When selecting a location for a fighting position the acronym of KOCOA is commonly utilized for assessing prime locations for fighting positions. KOCOA is often used for tactical and strategic battlefield analysis. The letters stand for:
K – Key Terrain: Key terrain is terrain features that give a tactical advantage to either side or it may be an objective that must be taken or held. This could be a hill, ridge, gulley, bridge, or a building that oversees an area with a lot of enemy movement. Key terrain should be occupied or at the very least, denied to the enemy.
O – Observation and Fields of Fire: The ability to see your enemy and effectively engage them with direct or indirect fire is a core necessity of a proper fighting position. Fields of fire should be clear. Examples of an ideal field of fire would be down the slope of a hill or across an open field as both provide excellent line of sight for the defender while minimizing their own visual signature (especially for the one looking down a hill, these are some of the best fighting position locations).
C – Cover and Concealment: Cover protects from bullets and shrapnel while concealment hides one from view. Ideally a fighting position should offer both protection and stealth. If a decision must be made for only of those, the selection of which will depend entirely on circumstances unique to the situation such as the enemy, the team and their abilities, the objective, etc.
O – Obstacles: Obstacles will slow or halt enemy movement. Obstacles can be natural such as rives and cliffs or manmade with area denial tools like razor wire and minefields. Positions should be placed behind or beside obstacles in order to funnel enemy movement into the team’s fields of fires.
A - Avenues of Approach: Routes in which the enemy force can use to advance toward the team or their objective are the avenues of approach. These should be covered with fields of fire. Positions should not be on or in these areas unless there are no other options as they place the team in direct confrontation with the opposing force.
While the acronym is clumsy like most military acronyms, KOCOA provides leaders with a simple tool to identify strong areas for positions to be placed to better confront their enemy.
The U.S. military has been warning about this problem for over a decade and Ukraine just proved them right.
Area denial isn’t about winning ground. It’s about making movement impossible. 🧵
Area denial, sometimes referred to as anti-access, is a common military tactic to control the access into and out of an area. Area denial is a particularly useful tool for irregular forces such as smaller special forces teams, guerrillas, and militias. The US military considers the adoption of area denial strategies by adversarial forces as, “[something] that may well be the most difficult operational challenge US forces will face over the coming decades.” While that quote may be from 2012 (JOAC 17 January 2012), it still rings true and can be seen in areas such as Ukraine where FPV drones create zones that units can only enter at their own peril. Area denial is a powerful tool in the strategic toolbox for units to make use of to help slow or fully stop the movement of enemy forces through an area. As usual, little disclaimer right here.
THIS IS NOT ADVICE TO GO DO ANYTHING ILLEGAL. DO NOT BREAK THE LAW. DO NOT CONSIDER BREAKING THE LAW. I DO NOT SUPPORT ANY EXTREMIST ORGANIZATIONS OR MOVEMENTS. I DO NOT SUPPORT ANY INSURRECTIONIST MOVEMENTS. I DO NOT ADVOCATE FOR ANY EXTREMIST ORGANIZATIONS, MOVEMENTS, OR IDEAOLOGIES. PLEASE DON’T DRONE STRIKE ME.
Key Principles.
Prior to getting into the various forms of area denial and how they are employed, the key ideas behind it need to be explained. Beginning with the economy of effort. That is to say, the goal of creating the greatest effect with the least amount of effort. If we want to stop an enemy in an area, you can position an army in an area but that requires men, supplies, logistics, weapons, and more that you have to take away from other areas. Instead, if you can leave behind a series of traps with only a handful of men, you maximize your defensive capabilities without having to throw piles of resources at the issue.
Area denial is also a very robust strategy that can be used in rural or urban environments, different strategies and tools can be employed in different environments. Whether the force is denying a road in a mountainous area or a series of fields in the flatlands of Iowa, area denial can be employed to great success.
Area denial strategies also synergize well with other common defensive measures and can create overall plans of defense that are iron clad despite having limited equipment or manpower. For example, making use of observation posts operating as an observer for an FPV unit or an ambush that triggers when an enemy unit triggers a trap. This allows the already amplified force to be multiplied by an even greater factor.
Finally, is the psychological impact that area denial tactics have. Creating a zone of alienation that units cannot enter lest they put themselves in peril creates a heavy sense of unease in the enemy, weakening their fighting spirit. Couple this with any losses gained in the area, it can force smaller sized units in the area to think twice about entering the area and overall hurt the morale of the enemy.
🧵In a SHTF scenario, you won’t have air support or armor. You’ll have a few neighbors and a plan.
If that plan doesn’t include a dedicated Support by Fire element, you’ve already lost the initiative.
The math of the maneuver: 🧵
Support by Fire
Mutual fire support is three words that can mean a lot of things. It encompasses any form of direct or indirect forms of fire support. It can come from artillery and mortars, naval guns, CAS, and drones. It also has another form that is less discussed, the art of support by fire (I stole that phrasing from an infantry magazine).
Support by fire is conducted by a maneuver force or unit wherein the goal is to physically observe the enemy and engage them with direct and indirect fires. For the purposes of this article, the focus will be primarily focused on direct fire as I have no knowledge of weapon systems such as javelins, Bradley IFVs, TOW missiles, or main battle tanks. Support by fire is best conducted by a separate team supporting a primary assaulting team but the battlespace can be very fluid and demanding on limited resources. Support by fire can be conducted either as a form of mutual support (elements assisting each other reciprocally) or as a standard form of support.
A support by fire mission can be a lifesaving operation for a unit that is either about to attack an enemy element or is actively defending against one.
As usual, little disclaimer right here. THIS IS NOT ADVICE TO GO DO ANYTHING ILLEGAL. DO NOT BREAK THE LAW. DO NOT CONSIDER BREAKING THE LAW. I DO NOT SUPPORT ANY EXTREMIST ORGANIZATIONS OR MOVEMENTS. I DO NOT SUPPORT ANY INSURRECTIONIST MOVEMENTS. I DO NOT ADVOCATE FOR ANY EXTREMIST ORGANIZATIONS, MOVEMENTS, OR IDEAOLOGIES. PLEASE DON’T DRONE STRIKE ME.
Recon and Preparation.
Prior to the actual engagement where the team will be employed, the team leader needs to perform a reconnoiter of the area where they will be supporting the attacking team. The leader needs to take things into account such as terrain, cover, concealment, sightlines, the enemy’s location, and the location of the team they are supporting. The team leader needs to weigh all of these factors to best identify where their team will set up to engage the enemy while ensuring their own ability to defend themselves.
Once the team leader has identified the location, they need to move their team up to the last piece of hard cover or concealment prior to reaching the point and have the team ready up. This is a good time for the team to cache any excess materials they may be carrying such as a heavy ruck or assault pack loaded with MREs.
Following this, the team must advance undetected to the point they will be supporting from. This is crucial because if the team is discovered, they risk falling under enemy fire and preventing their ability to conduct their support mission. Ideally, this means a low crawl. It sucks. It’s slow. It’s a hassle. But it is better than risking discovery.
Once the team has arrived, the team leader needs to determine the emplacement of their team elements. The calculus of this changes depending on the quantity and type of weapons systems and men at his disposal. If the team is setting up with an emplaced machine gun, things are different than say, three automatic riflemen and a guy with an M203. A team leader will employ the use of the dumbest acronym ever developed OKOCA (sometimes OCOKA, sometimes OCKAO, I have seen it in like 8 forms at this point lol) for this exact moment. OKOCA stands for O – observation and fields of fire, K – key terrain, O – obstacles, C – cover and concealment, and A – avenues of approach.
🧵A lot of you are terminally blackpilled. You are doing exactly what they want.
The incessant and obscene messaging is rooted in a 70-year-old blueprint for breaking the human will, rooted in the Korean War.
Understand the mechanisms and break yourself and others free:
Modern social engineering is a very refined version of the Thought Reform techniques the Chinese pioneered during the Korean War.
In these camps, beatings and physical torture took second chair to mental anguish and group ostracization.
The same tools that were utilized to try and create human robots that would espouse Chinese communism over 70 years ago are still being utilized today to manipulate populations and society as a whole.
First, we need to establish the history of this procedure and what it initially entailed...
Thought Reform and Brainwashing During the Korean War.
After capturing US soldiers, the Chinese military interned these men into camps where they were focused on turning them into tools of the state. Soldiers that would admit to crimes they did not commit such as saying they used chemical or biological agents in the field to hurt the United States on the international stage. The theory also held that after returning them home, the soldiers would carry their new programming and spread it among the US, leading to a communist revolt such as the one conducted by Mao. There were 7 key aspects to the Chinese brainwashing program. They were as follows: milieu control, mystical manipulation, confession, self-sanctification through purity, loading the language, doctrine over person, and dispensing of existence. We will delve into each of these.
It’s no surprise that most people in the US and Western civilization as a whole are not physically active enough. Many people are overweight, have little muscle endurance, and absolutely no cardiovascular ability. By not maintaining some basic level of physical fitness one is put at much higher risk for various health conditions such as heart disease, strokes, type 2 diabetes, and a number of cancers by up to 40% in some cases. From a more practical and less abstract approach, US Army data shows that soldiers with higher aerobic capacity and muscle endurance had less non-combat injuries in the field, as well as being more effective in their roles in the field.
From a prepping perspective, not being mildly to moderately fit puts yourself at a massive disadvantage and makes one a liability. Fitness means you can do the physical tasks such as walking home with a 30 pound get-home (bug out) bag, it means you can haul water from a body to your home for purification, it means you can cut up and remove the fallen tree after the tornado in your front yard, it means you can properly engage a potential threat if the fight lasts longer than a minute. Prepping is often thought of a “hobby” where you are just hoarding goods and items (something I have fought vehemently against and wrote 2 books because of it), as a byproduct of that mentality, the body is often neglected. Both from a medical perspective and a fitness perspective. Prepping is as much about “weathering the storm,” as it is about being able to effectively operate after it. You can’t be a basement shut-in forever.
Thankfully getting a basic level of fitness doesn’t require you to become a psychopath who lives in the gym and eats nothing but liver and chicken breast for ever meal. You can make minor adjustments that grow your abilities with TIME without even needing a gym membership! Americans tend to want to go hard and fast with things, expecting instant results, this is one of the many cases where that is not realistic. To become better we must slowly build ourselves up. The purpose of this piece is to help those who are just starting find initiative, assess their current abilities, build a weekly exercise regimen, and then stick to it. I also want to briefly touch on diet at the tail end of this.
Assessing Current Abilities.
Before determining what sort of exercise plan one is going to adhere to, they need to determine what their current abilities are. This unfortunately is a usually a very humbling experience and needs to happen. Without knowing what one’s limitations are, they risk injury, overtraining, or wasting time on an inappropriate plan.
Cardiovascular endurance can be tested in a high impact and low impact test, ideally one performs both. The high impact test begins with a 5 minute walk, then try to cover 1.5 miles as fast as one can without harming themselves. This does not mean push yourself beyond your limits and risk injury. If you need to stop or walk, that’s okay. After achieving 1.5 miles the time taken is noted and checked against a generic reference. If it takes less than 13 minutes, one is an above average point for a beginner, for between 13 and 16 minutes, that is a relatively average start point, and if it is longer than 16 minutes, they are below average (and that is okay!). The low impact test is a 6 minute walk on a flat surface and after 6 minutes the distance is noted, healthy adults often exceed 500 to 600 meters (~1600-1900 feet). Note all of this information for the next section and for goal planning.
Testing muscular strength likewise is a relatively quick process and does not require any specific equipment, bodyweight is a decent enough baseline. Begin with testing pushups, see how many you can do without breaking form. If you can’t even do one, try knee pushups, if you can’t do one, try against a wall! Then try squats, perform as many as you can in one set. Then try a pull up if you have a pull-up bar (very cheap online and cheaper if bought used), if you cannot do one, try a flexed arm hang, if you can’t do longer than a second, note it. Finally try a forearm plank and hold it as long as you can with good form. Note all of this information for the next section and for goal planning.
You can also test your mobility and flexibility with a sit and reach test where you sit flat on the ground, legs extended, knees straight, and reach forward. Not being able to reach past your toes is generally regarded as a negative score and is something to work on.