Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Gene Hamilton Profile picture
@GeneHamilton
Dec 26 • 6 tweets • 2 min read • Read on X
For those who are unaware: want a sign that the Trump Administration is doing the right thing by sanctioning a major proponent of the censorship industrial complex, Imran Ahmed?

Just take a look at a few of the lawyers representing him in a lawsuit against the Trump Administration...

🧵
Robbie Kaplan = represented E. Jean Carroll in the infamous lawfare litigation against President Trump, where New York passed a special law just to extend the statute of limitations.

Funded by Reid Hoffman, of course. Image
Norm Eisen. Need I say more? Image
Hunter Biden's former lawyer: Image
Nothing odd about one of the leading proponents and advocates of censorship from the UK having this kind of representation in the United States, right?

Especially when the Biden White House relied on his "disinformation dozen" report to censor Americans...

Nothing to see here...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Gene Hamilton

Gene Hamilton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GeneHamilton

Gene Hamilton Profile picture
Nov 9
.🚨 Every American has the right to live in peace at home, free from illegal harassment and intimidation.

When this basic aspect of the social contract is violated, law enforcement must intervene.

But what is happening to my friends in this matter is shocking. 🧵
/2 First thing to note: Stephen and Katie are dear friends of mine. They are loving parents. They are patriots.

So yes, I have strong personal feelings about this situation.

But what appears to be happening here should bother every American.

Why? Read on.
/3 According to public reporting, in April, a woman sent text messages to a WhatsApp group asserting that Stephen, "the evil fascist . . . had moved into Arlington."

She further said that she and a group were going to "make his life hell."

nytimes.com/2025/11/03/us/…Image
Read 20 tweets
Gene Hamilton Profile picture
Jul 2
.🚨Judicial insurrection!

A single district court judge in DC wants to set aside hundreds of years of precedent, the Constitution, and the plain text of the law, to say that the United States cannot stop illegal aliens from flooding across the border.

This cannot stand.

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…Image
In addition to relief under the APA, classwide relief to every human being on earth who might ever come to the United States illegally!

UNREAL. Image
The decision is stayed for 14 days to allow DOJ to appeal, but think about the shenanigans ongoing here.

- The Supreme Court just stopped nationwide injunctions on Friday. The district court probably re-wrote/tailored its decision to get around the Supreme Court's clear guidance
Read 5 tweets
Gene Hamilton Profile picture
May 30
❗️JUDICIAL OVERREACH: Why are we seeing lawfare and rule by judicial decree, despite a resounding victory in the 2024 election by @realDonaldTrump?

More reasons than seconds in an hour—but here’s a big one:

A thread🧵
We have brought up generations of lawyers—conservative and liberal, but especially conservatives—who have became infatuated with the idea that becoming a federal judge or a Justice on the Supreme Court is the penultimate accomplishment of the best and brightest.
That idea— stemming from the ideological fallacy that Article III is somehow intellectually superior and more prestigious than Articles I and II—is incoherent, indefensible, and inconsistent with what the Founding Fathers understood.

That having a “record” is somehow a liability. That zealous advocacy for a client is somehow not honorable.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(