The total market cap of crypto is $3.1T (down 14% in the past year) but if you zoom out we've gone from 0 to $3.1T since 2009 with too much easy money made.
Easy money stopped in 2025. VC pump and dumps, memecoins and DATs all fell flat.
2025 was the first year in the history of the industry that products that don't rely on token speculation outperformed. See Polymarket and stablecoins. Usage of both surged while the total market cap of crypto was down.
Bleeding edge products that bring in new people for reasons beyond token speculation will continue to accelerate. If you want to outperform you must be building and using these products. That's where 1confirmation remains.
On token prices, three things remain true:
1) Snakeoil salesman will oversell their narratives and it's best to see this for what it is
2) The macro trend of people trusting institutions less and the internet becoming more important is very real and credible neutral money is the only $100T+ opportunity on the planet
3) There's only two coins that have credibly neutrality: BTC and ETH
Position accordingly 🚀
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
At this point no one in their right mind can believe the SEC is acting in the best interest of the American people by forcing Kraken to shutdown its staking offering
The SEC reached out to me about staking in 2020 bc they saw an article about @1confirmation's interest in staking. We had a good discussion - they were genuinely open minded & interested in learning
Today shows that while there's great people at the SEC, leadership is lost
Stopping a company which has earned a lot of consumer trust by providing users over a decade of great service from allowing Americans to earn staking reward doesn't help anybody
The reason is institutional LPs are lazy at allocating, so way too much $$ goes to VCs that fit a mold and spin a good narrative but lack original insights, strong vision and product understanding
That leads to things like FTX, which was propped up by hundreds of millions in out of touch venture capital, which was propped up by bad institutional capital allocators 🫤
It’s useful to make a good faith assumption that SBF & team are trying their best, but the hypocrisy (which prob won’t be addressed by PR speak) is hard to deny
Here’s context on why many who care about crypto and freedom were triggered by the recent FTX post on the DCCPA bill:
FTX is the known consumer brand that offers a crypto exchange to retail, but there’s also Alameda Research, a lesser known investment firm closely affiliated with FTX
Many have assumed there has been shared ownership & decision making at FTX/Alameda & observed a recurring pattern between them that has been predatory to retail
If Citadel owned and operated a penny stock exchange, bought early, then pumped & offered higher, that’d be bad…
The tldr is it has venture upside over a 5+ yr time horizon & grail purchases make NFTs more “real” to the masses which is great for creativity in the world
Most see NFTs as a zero sum casino but there’s something deeper happening. More on the asset class, collection & punk...
Creativity is what makes us uniquely human and NFTs are enabling a new wave of creative freedom