InfantryDort Profile picture
Jan 6 3 tweets 3 min read Read on X
The Museum Civilization

There is a peculiar class of modern Westerner who believes history has been permanently retired.

They speak of conquest the way a child speaks of wolves. Simply confident it no longer applies, offended that you would even mention it, and deeply upset when reminded that teeth still exist.

They insist the world runs on rules now and that borders are sacred. Also that true power has been replaced by paperwork.

This belief is not moral in the least. It’s f*****g archaeological.

They live inside institutions built by violence, defended by men they no longer understand, and guaranteed by forces they refuse to acknowledge. Like tourists wandering a fortress, they admire the stonework while mocking the idea of a siege.

They confuse order with nature. EVERY. SINGLE. TIME. Then blame the person that reminds them of this.

Civilization is not the default state of humanity. It is an achievement that is temporary, fragile, and expensive. It exists only where force once cleared the ground and still quietly patrols the perimeter.

A lion does not debate the ethics of hunger. Neither does a starving empire.

History is not a morality play, it is a pressure test. When pressure rises, abstractions collapse first. Laws follow power; they do NOT precede it. Property exists only where someone can prevent it from being taken. Sovereignty is not declared, it is enforced.

The modern West outsourced this enforcement, then forgot the invoice existed.

So when someone points out uncomfortable realities (whether about Greenland, Venezuela, or the broader balance of power) they respond with ritual incantations: “You can’t do that.” “That’s wrong.” “That’s against the rules.”

As if the rules themselves are armed. As if history paused because we asked nicely.

This is how empires fall. Not from invasion alone, but from conceptual rot. From mistaking a long season of safety for a permanent condition. From believing lethality is immoral instead of foundational.

Every civilization that forgot how violence works eventually relearned it the hard way. The conquerors did not arrive because they were monsters; they arrived because their victims could no longer imagine them.

The tragedy is not that power still exists. The tragedy is that so many have forgotten it does.

Idk who needs to hear this but civilization is a garden grown atop a graveyard. Ignore the soil, and someone else will plant something far less gentle.

Hate me for being the messenger and asking the hard questions about conquest if you want. You’re just wasting your time.
Every ideological idiot is piling on my Greenland post because I asked the hard questions about what happens if someone stronger just wants to take it. Screeching and wailing at the thought.

They are living tributes to the conquered in history, because they confuse the message for malice.

I can’t help you.
Case in point from a writer for The Atlantic:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with InfantryDort

InfantryDort Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @infantrydort

Dec 12, 2025
🧵The Republic Failure Pattern: Observed across every collapsed republic in history

This is not ideology or opinion. Every republic-to-empire transition in recorded history follows the same structural breakdown.

Different cultures. Similar sequence.

If you study Rome, Athens, Venice, France, Weimar Germany, the British Empire—the pattern does not change.👇Image
1/ Loss of a shared civic definition

The population can no longer agree on:
• what citizenship means
• who the state exists for
• what obligations accompany rights
Once identity fractures, law becomes contested.

Example: In the late Roman Republic, citizenship expanded rapidly without a shared civic ethic, turning Roman identity from duty-bound membership into a contested political instrument.
2/ Law shifts from principle to instrument

Legal mechanisms remain intact, but:
• enforcement becomes selective
• process substitutes for justice
• outcomes are justified procedurally, not morally
This precedes legitimacy collapse.

Example: During the late Roman Republic, emergency laws and prosecutions were selectively applied through proscriptions, reducing law from a neutral standard to a factional weapon.
Read 17 tweets
Nov 12, 2025
So I’m randomly awake in the middle of the night. Musing about why so many are turning to communism.

Then I scroll my timeline briefly. All I see is:

1. 50 year mortgages
2. H1B sadness
3. Chinese student visas
4. Some graph showing the cost of a home versus annual income between now and 1985.

No wonder why some people think capitalism isn’t working.

1. They’re getting replaced.
2. Priced out of their own future.
3. Told they’re not smart enough to do technical jobs.

Do you know how easy it is to tempt someone into following tyrannical systems when they’re economically stagnant?

I’m a sworn enemy of communism. But I’m not ignorant to the factors that lead to its rise. Isn’t just communism though, it’s any authoritarian system.

Needless to say, I have concerns. We objectively know what happens in history when these things go down.

Someone has to make the hard call to rip off the bandaid of foreign meddling. Problematic though, isn’t it? For all the elite interests profiting from it.

I’m here to tell you that greed knows no limit, and will eventually lead its champions into the guillotine. History has shown this to be true 100% of the time.

Horrors are unleashed when a population feels they have no hope of peaceful advancement. We MUST avert this.

Someone needs to bring the American Dream back to reality, before we go into REM sleep on the American Nightmare.
It is nearly impossible to defend a fractured country. I have selfish reasons for deep diving this. It makes my job infinitely more difficult.
I don’t envy the President or Congress. These problems have been in motion for a century. But something drastic must be done, and that right soon.
Read 5 tweets
Nov 5, 2025
🧵How 20th Century Women Helped Build the Systems That Silenced Them

Every generation thinks it’s immune to history. But the story of women supporting movements that later enslaved them is as old as civilization itself.

It always begins with virtue. And it always ends with control.👇
2️⃣
In 1978, women filled the streets of Iran demanding justice and moral order.

They thought Islamism would correct the Shah’s corruption and restore dignity after decades of Western humiliation.

Months later, those same women were forced under mandatory hijab. The prisons filled with their sisters.
3️⃣
In Afghanistan, village women blessed their sons and brothers as they joined the Mujahedeen. They thought they were fighting for faith and freedom.

By 1996, the Taliban had banned them from school, work, or even stepping outside without a man.

Their victory became their cage.
Read 9 tweets
Oct 14, 2025
The Military and the Press: Two Centuries of Push–Pull

Ok guys, I see a lot of press hysteria about the new Pentagon rules. I’m going to lay out the history for you, objectively.

From 1812 to now, here’s how military reporting in America has actually evolved: when access expanded, when it tightened, and why.

This isn’t designed to generate rage. It’s to help everyone (especially the media) see the pattern. It’s an ebb and flow that’s been part of American history for over 200 years.

Strap in. It’s a long one. But I think it explains how we got here. 🧵
1) Overview

People keep saying new Pentagon press rules are “unprecedented” and “anti-First Amendment.”

History says otherwise.

America’s default is a free press—but access to military spaces and operations has always been managed. Let’s walk the 200-year arc.
2) War of 1812: the seed of control

News moved slowly, but commanders still tried to shape it. After New Orleans, Gen. Andrew Jackson briefly banned publication without approval and even jailed an editor (we obviously don't do this today).

Courts pushed back—but the point stands: from the start, commanders tightened info when they thought lives were at stake.
Read 27 tweets
Sep 21, 2025
🧵When the Game Breaks: Why "Defection" Destroys Neutrality in the Military

I get a lot of grief on my takes these days. After talking with @LibertySuperman today, I found some inspiration in trying to explain the problem.

He will deep dive it soon. But this is important. 👇 Image
1/
The military is meant to be apolitical. That was the status quo: both sides cooperated by keeping partisan politics out of the ranks. It wasn’t perfect, but the trust held. That is, until defection toward ideology occurred.
2/
In game theory, this is the Prisoner’s Dilemma.

If both sides cooperate → stability.

If one defects while the other plays fair → the defector wins.

If both defect → chaos.

The U.S. military’s neutrality was based on cooperation.
Read 14 tweets
Aug 2, 2025
🧵The Evolution of Post-War Military Promotions🧵

I get a lot of questions asking what happened to the great leaders of the Second World War.

Because the machine always resets to comfort.

George Marshall’s purge of deadweight colonels and generals was a wartime anomaly, a moment when the brutal clarity of existential war forced the Army to prioritize combat effectiveness over seniority, connections, or credentials.

But after the war, peacetime priorities crept back in like rot through a cracked hull.

Here’s why Marshall’s system faded, and how we ended up with the mess we have today:👇Image
🕊️ 1. Victory Bred Complacency
After WWII, the U.S. emerged as the undisputed superpower. That success, ironically, planted the seed of decline.

The Army no longer had to be ruthless, there was no imminent threat to force hard choices.

Promotions reverted to being based on time in grade, politics, and who checked the right boxes.

The institutional attitude shifted from:
“Who can win the next war?” to “Who deserves their turn?”
🏛️ 2. The Bureaucracy Hardened
Marshall used personal judgment, informal feedback, and bold maneuvers to bypass the bureaucracy. But he was the exception, not the rule.

After he left, systems calcified: Promotion boards were bound by OERs, time in service charts, and quotas.
The “plucking boards” were disbanded. Risk aversion became institutional policy.

General officer promotions became a delicate dance of politics, often more about optics than outcomes.

You could game the system without ever being good at war.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(