So, Greenland is back in the news.
I’ve been wondering why there hasn’t been some large scale industrial development over there, given that the geological map shows reserves for a lot of critical minerals.
Then I did what I always do - started digging, and I educated myself on just how freaking hard it is to mine for resources in Greenland (and the Arctic in general). 🧵👇
Infrastructure deficit.
The single biggest cost driver in Greenland is the lack of basic infrastructure. In most mining jurisdictions (like Australia or Canada), a mine can often connect to an existing power grid or road. That’s not the case with Greenland.
80% ice, no roads connecting towns in Greenland, every settlement is effectively an island.
There is no national power grid to plug into either, which means mines must build their own power plants, adding hundreds of millions of dollars to upfront capital expenditure.
Also, since mines are to be located located in remote wilderness, companies must construct full-service towns for their workers - housing, sanitation, you name it.
Extreme environment
The Arctic environment imposes strict limits on when and how work can be done, drastically increasing costs.
For starters, you can only work 3-4 months max before the darkness and extreme cold halt operations (or make them very expensive).
Shipping lanes are often frozen or clogged with icebergs for large parts of the year too.
And building heavy industrial processing plants on permafrost requires expensive, specialized engineering.
Human capital.
Greenland has a population of 57k - about the size of a single small town in the US or Europe.
There is physically not enough surplus labor to staff heavy industry. Modern mining requires highly specialized engineers, geologists, and heavy machinery operators. These workers need to be flown from Canada or Australia (as well as other countries with such expertise).
The cost for such labor + flying them in and out, accommodation, and the wages required to tempt workers to remote Arctic locations is pretty steep.
Now, I’m not saying: don’t extract the resources. I’m just explaining to myself (and others that may not know) why this hasn’t been done yet.
It’s difficult, expensive, and up until recently - unnecessary (since we used to get our REE from China).
So before shitting on DK or EU for not “doing enough” to develop Greenland, remember that…nobody did. Because it’s a fight against the most brutal conditions nature has to offer.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵Venezuela is NOT about cartels, it’s about China (and Russia).
This is about geopolitics.
In recent decades, Venezuela has become a vassal state of China.
To understand why Venezuela matters now, you need to understand why it collapsed in the first place. 👇
Venezuela used to be the most stable democracy in Latin America. Center-left. Pro-US. Oil nationalized, yes - but professionally run. It worked, until it didn’t.
The collapse was caused by a lethal combination of oil dependency + institutional rot + unchecked populism.
When oil prices were high (starting with the Yon Kippur war), the government spent everything. There was no Norwegian model in Venezuela
No savings. No one investments. No diversification. Therefore, when prices fell upon discovery of oil in the North Sea, the system imploded.
WARNING: LONG THREAD 🧵
Dear Americans,
Your political and media class has sold you a very convenient fairy tale for decades - the tale of how your tax dollars pay to defend freeloading Europe.
While it's an emotionally satisfying narrative, it's also wrong.
THE U.S. DOES NOT SUBSIDIZE EUROPEAN DEFENCE.
You are not running a charity, you are running an empire. And empires are costly.
Your forward deployments, your bases, your carrier groups, etc. - they are the pillars of a global security architecture that mainly serves you: to protect your trade routes, your currency, your corporate supply chains, your ability to project force anywhere on the planet in hours and days, not months.
Let’s walk through this like adults, and not emotional toddlers, shall we?
1. Power projection, not philanthropy
Your prosperity rests on your ability to project power -military, financial, informational.
Your ports are not overflowing with cheap goods and energy because the world thinks you’re cute or because U.S. Treasuries are sacred. You sit at the center of the system because you guarantee that system with force: sea lanes, chokepoints, sanctions, no-fly zones when it suits you.
No one forced the U.S. into that role. Washington chose it because the benefits - geopolitical leverage, economic primacy, dollar hegemony - are enormous. Stop pretending it’s some unreciprocated act of kindness toward Europe.
2. Europe is your global hub
Open a map. Then look at where your stuff is.
Europe is the logistical backbone that lets you wage war and conduct operations across Africa, the Middle East, and parts of Asia without having to move everything across the ocean every time.
Ramstein and the rest of the European network are not there to “protect Germany’” They are there because from European soil you can:
- Fly troops and cargo to Iraq, Syria, the Gulf, the Sahel, Afghanistan and back with minimal time loss.
- Run command-and-control, ISR, and drone operations into multiple theatres.
- Treat wounded and rotate forces efficiently because the entire infrastructure is already in place.
You could try to rebuild that from scratch inside CONUS or in less stable regions. It would cost you billions, take years, and give you worse geography. Forward basing in allied countries is, in many analyses, cheaper than constantly rotating equivalent forces from the U.S. and trying to replicate those hubs at home.
So no, you’re not “paying to defend Europe.” You’re paying for real estate that underwrites your global reach.
Unfortunately, the Europeans are retarded enough to bury our beloved contient by selling out to China.
China is an absolute cancer to our free way of life. Many Chinese see themselves as superior to Europeans - in race, intellect, culture, everything. And that’s how they’ll treat us (some in positions of power in the private sector - already are).
Also, China has invested decades and billions of yuans in dismantling European industry and unity 👇
State-backed subsidies fuel artificial surpluses (solar, steel, and now EVs). These are dumped on the EU market at unmatchable prices, driving solvent European firms into bankruptcy. While we operate on the premise of free-market economies, the Chinese state capitalism actively directs capital to strategic industries, creating an uneven playing field.
📉 Asymmetric Warfare
European markets remain open, while China restricts access via "negative lists" and has historically forced EU companies to hand over proprietary tech to enter their market via JVs.
🧵 THREAD SUPPLY CHAINS > MISSILES: China flipping the global tech & military balance
1/ 🚨 Big escalation. China’s Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) is rolling out sweeping export controls on rare earths, processing tech, magnets, recycling, and associated know-how - with military & AI implications baked in. 👇
2/ Starting December 1, any export (or re-export) of technology, equipment, or data relating to rare earth mining, smelting, magnet manufacturing, or recycling must get a Chinese government license. No exceptions.
3/‼️Even foreign products made outside China are hit: if Chinese-origin rare earth content ≥ 0.1% of the value, or if Chinese processing/tech was used somewhere in the chain, the exporter must obtain a Chinese license. This is extraterritorial reach.
Forget the world order of yesterday. Zoom out. Think long-term.
Because the real war of the 21st century isn’t about borders per se, it's about civilizations: The West vs China.
Russia? Not a civilization - never was, never will be. Just a piece on the Go board. Its role is to take territory and bleed itself dry, while weakening and dividing the West. The Dragon (🇨🇳) watches the Bear ( 🇷🇺) bleed and will collect the spoils when the time is right. Let’s break this down. To understand the clash, we have to know who’s fighting. 🧵👇
1/ What is Western civilization?
Athenian logic: categories, clarity, contradiction.
Roman law: institutions over men.
Christian values: the soul comes before the state.
The individual is sovereign; truth is arbitrated in court.
Clausewitz doctrine.
The result? A rules-based world order. Not static, not chined to immovable hierarchies, but agile and adaptable.
2/ China is not a nation-state. It’s a civilization-state.
Its prime imperative isn’t liberty, it’s avoiding chaos - because dynastic collapse, civil war, and mass death have shaped every chapter of Chinese history.
Where we learned total war in the 1800s with Napoleon, China wrote the manual in 500 BC.
Do you guys know the meaning of the term "ketman"?
It's a Persian word for the practice of maintaining an outward appearance of Islamic orthodoxy while inwardly dissenting.
2/ In the former Soviet Union, ketman was the strategy everyone who wasn’t a true believer in communism adopted to stay out of trouble from the state authorities. You lived by lies to survive because you thought you had no other choice.
3/ I don't blame my ancestors for doing it - I wouldn't be alive today if they didn't practice ketman. The problem with ketman is that when you live a lie long enough, it corrupts your character and ultimately - society.