Supreme Court hears plea seeking permission for passive euthanasia
The matter is being heard by Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan.
Advocate Rashmi Nandakumar: Harish Rana was in his late teens when he fell from the fourth floor of a Chandigarh apartment and has since been in an incurable and vegetative state with 100 percent MR.
Advocate Rashmi Nandakumar: Harish Rana has been receiving clinically assisted nutrition and hydration, which is a form of mechanical life support.
The counsel referred to the Supreme Court landmark case of Common Cause vs Union of I
Advocate Rashmi Nandakumar: The medical board is of the following opinion, eh, Mr. Harish Rana has non-progressive, irreversible brain damage following severe traumatic brain injury with diffuse accidental injury.
Advocate Rashmi Nandakumar: He fulfils the criteria of permanent vegetative state and has been in the state for the past 13 years. The continued administration of clinically assisted nutrition and hydration is required for the sustenance of his survival.
Advocate Rashmi Nandakumar: Passive euthanasia occurs when medical practitioners do not provide life-sustaining treatment, that is, treatment necessary to keep a patient alive, or remove patients from life-sustaining treatment.
ASG Aishwarya Bhati: My lords had only asked us to assist. We did a comprehensive research and we saw that there has been no implementation of directions of Common Cause. For the first time, lordship.
ASG Aishwarya Bhati: Here, my lords, unfortunately, Harish Rana has been in a state of complete inertness. His eyes do not track. He does not respond to fear or forceful objects coming in front of his eyes or contemplation, my lord. There is a lot of change, my lords.
Court: We heard Rashmi Nandakumar and learned ASG Aishwarya Bhati for Union of India. Both have filed their written submissions with case laws they propose to rely on. Arguments concluded. Judgment reserved.
J. Pardiwala: Thank you, Ms. Bhati. Thanks, Rashmi. We appreciate the effort put in. We do decide matters every day. These are very delicate issues. We are mortals and we feel, who are we to decide about someone’s life.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Supreme Court Justice Sanjay Karol to shortly speak on “Awareness to Action: Youth as catalysts for constitutional responsibility in modern India” at Dharmashashtra National Law University (DNLU), Jabalpur.
#SupremeCourt #JusticeSanjayKarol #DNLU
Adv. Siddharth R Gupta: the foremost duty of the youth is to protect, promote the justice delivery in the judicial institutions and every person who is a part of it.
Gupta: it is the duty of the youth to contribute to the formation of a social order where every person is able to exercise their right to the fullest without impinging on the rights of others.
Delhi High Court hears plea alleging that there are errors in the answer key released by the Consortium of National Law Universities for CLAT 2025 (UG admissions).
Justice Jyoti Singh is hearing the matter.
#DelhiHighCourt
Judge: Yes, counsel have you seen that question regarding Sohanlal...?
Counsel says he has. Adds that there is preliminary objection to maintainability of writ petition in Delhi. Exam is conducted across country, he says.
Judge: Does it change (Article) 226? I don't need to tell you to read the Constitution.
Delhi High Court stays Bar Council of India’s directions initiating a CBI enquiry into the authenticity of the LL.B (Hons.) Degree of Sanjeev Nasiar and directing his removal from the post of Vice Chairman, Bar Council of Delhi until then
Senior Advocate Vikas Pahwa appeared for Nasiar stating BCI has invoked its revisional powers, assumed jurisdiction on its own. No opportunity to be heard was given to me. BCI directly published it. They don’t say its forged, they say it is “highly questionable”
Senior Adv Kirtiman Singh appeared for BCI - Agrees that the University has vouched for the genuineness of the degree, but it does not have the last word on proving genuine of the degree. Universities may be complicit in giving fake degrees.
Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi to shortly speak as part of a discussion organised by Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy on 'Decoding Defection'.
Follow this thread for live updates.
@DrAMSinghvi @Vidhi_India
Discussion moderated by Arghya Sengupta, founder and Research Director at Vidhi.
@Arghya_justify @Vidhi_India
@Arghya_justify @Vidhi_India Sengupta: I wish I could say Dr Singhvi is still a parliamentarian but he is not because of defections. So parliament's loss is our gain and he is still firmly ensconced within the legal fraternity.
#SupremeCourt is hearing the curative plea by Delhi Metro Rail Corporation against the top court’s 2021 order that required it to pay ₹8,000 crore to Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited, a subsidiary of Anil Ambani-owned Reliance Infrastructure Limited.
#SupremeCourt
CJI: We will discharge the board till 1pm. Justices Pardiwala aur Misra ko bata dena (to court staff). Maybe they can attend to urgent matters of the other benches.
Former Attorney General KK Venugopal appears for DMRC, gives genesis of case.
#SupremeCourt
Sr Adv Harish Salve appears for DAMEPL: If my ld friend needs time till lunch even we will. We have serious issues on maintainability.
Bombay High Court is hearing batch of petitions including one by comic Kunal Kamra challenging amendments to the IT Rules of 2023 which provided for formation of Fact Check Units (FCUs)
@kunalkamra88 @GoI_MeitY
Adv Gautam Bhatia for Association of Indian magazines making submissions.
Bhatia: We have raised three questions:
- Does the constitution authorise govt to classify speech based on values?
- Does constitution authorise govt to arbiter what is true and false…
Bhatia: classify what is true and false
- Are the impugned amendment intra vires the parent statute