Sayer Ji Profile picture
Jan 22 8 tweets 5 min read Read on X
🚨Last June, I landed in London—unaware that my lawful American speech had been dragged into a British court, and a secret arrest was waiting.

It failed. But the message was clear:

🇬🇧Britain believes it has jurisdiction over the First Amendment. 🇺🇸

It doesn't.

@prestonjbyrne's GRANITE Act draws the constitutional line.
🧵👇Image
Image
2/The UK has become ground zero for "libel tourism"—where foreign courts claim authority over American citizens for speech made on American soil.

👉Speech that is 100% legal under the First Amendment.
👉Speech that would never see a courtroom here.
👉My Substack writings, social media posts & lawful complaint to the UK's Solicitors Regulation Authority, all while made on American soil, were weaponized against me‼️

(Details of this extraordinary violation of my rights can be found here: sayerji.substack.com/p/sayer-ji-a-s…)Image
3/ This isn't hypothetical—I'm one of the targets.

Imran Ahmed's UK-based CCDH branded me and @RobertKennedyJr as the "Disinformation Dozen"—comparing us to sexual predators and criminals for openly questioning vaccine safety and daring to advocate for parental rights and informed consent.

🇬🇧 We were called murderers who "profit from death"—before British Parliament.

Those smears were laundered into justification for our deplatforming, then escalated further: an attempt to criminalize our speech as "lethal."

Question vaccines. Lose your platform. Face prosecution

Foreign defamation. American and international consequences.

(Details in "When Parliament Becomes a Weapon": sayerji.substack.com/p/when-parliam…)Image
4/Enter Preston Byrne and the Granite Act.🔥

GRANITE: 🌍Act-Guaranteeing Rights Against Novel International Tyranny & Extortion 🇺🇸

The legislation draws a hard constitutional line:

Foreign judgments against Americans for First
Amendment-protected speech will NOT be enforceable in the United States.

Period.Image
5/Why "Granite"?

Because American free speech isn't negotiable.

It's not subject to foreign approval.

It doesn't bend to international pressure campaigns or lawfare designed to silence dissent.

It's set in stone.

(Full Text of the Wyoming GRANITE Act: )prestonbyrne.com/2025/11/19/the…Image
6/ The First Amendment wasn't written to protect popular speech.

It was written to protect unpopular speech—the kind that challenges power, questions narratives, and holds institutions accountable.

That's exactly what foreign actors are trying to crush.

🗽I can think of few better birthday gifts for the United States as it approaches its Semiquincentennial (America250) than a law that remembers where that boundary lies.Image
7/ We fought a revolution to free ourselves from British rule over our rights.

Nearly 250 years later, we shouldn't have to fight another one to protect our speech from British courts.

🔥1776 wasn't a suggestion.

The Granite Act sends a clear message to any foreign power attempting to silence American citizens:

𝗗𝗼𝗻'𝘁 𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗙𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗔𝗺𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁, and respect the sovereignty of both our citizens and our nation if you expect the same. 🇺🇸🇻🇮

Full article: sayerji.substack.com/p/dont-tread-o…Image
@threadreaderapp unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sayer Ji

Sayer Ji Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sayerjigmi

Apr 2
1/🚨The U.S. government just signed a federal court order admitting it ran a secret censorship operation against its own citizens.

Most people think that's the end of the story.

It isn't. It's the beginning.

A thread every American needs to read.🧵👇 Image
Image
2/ What the decree actually says...

The Missouri v. Biden Consent Decree is real and significant.

It permanently prohibits the Surgeon General, CDC, and CISA from pressuring social media platforms to suppress protected American speech.

The government signed it. A federal judge enforces it.

But read the fine print.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice…Image
3/ The decree covers 3 agencies. 5 platforms. Named plaintiffs only.

It says NOTHING about:

🔴 Foreign NGOs publishing fraudulent hit lists
🔴 Dark money funding those NGOs
🔴 Government officials amplifying their reports
🔴 Cross-border legal proceedings targeting American citizens for writing articles

The machine is still running.
Read 7 tweets
Mar 28
1/🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Federal documents, unreported until now, show Bill Gates flew to Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach estate in 2013 — alone, without his security team, on Epstein's private plane.

Here is the full record of what surrounded that visit.
🧵👇 Image
Image
2/ Let's be precise about who Epstein was in March 2013.

Not a man under suspicion. Not a controversial figure.

A convicted sexual predator.

His guilty plea: soliciting a minor for prostitution — a charge whose language tells you everything about who the system was protecting.

The girl was a victim.
The legal system called her a prostitute.Image
3/ Federal prosecutors had built a real case:

— 36 victims identified
— 34 confirmed minors
— 53-page federal indictment drafted
— 82-page prosecution memo ready

None of it was ever filed.

Epstein served 13 months — leaving jail 6 days a week.

His victims were still fighting in federal court for the right to be heard.

While all of that was on the public record — Gates flew to his house.Image
Image
Read 11 tweets
Mar 26
1/🚨Every outlet covering the Rothschild raid this week used the same word: "contact."

Suspicious contact. Alleged contact. Contact under investigation.

The federal documents don't describe contact.

They describe a pipeline. Intelligence flowing one direction. Money flowing the other. The same channel. For years. 🧵👇Image
2/10 December 2015.

The Rothschild bank wires $10 million to Epstein's Virgin Islands company.

Three days later, Epstein forwards a UN official's personal credit union account details to his financial manager with one annotation:

"250k."

📄 EFTA_R1_01591069 justice.gov/epstein/files/…
📄 EFTA_R1_00006537 justice.gov/epstein/files/…

Same pipeline. Both directions. Three days apart.Image
3/10 The UN official receiving $250,000: Terje Rød-Larsen — UN Special Envoy, architect of the Oslo Accords.

The man who routed the banking details: Fabrice Aidan — French diplomat, former Rothschild employee, serving UN Special Assistant.

The same Fabrice Aidan now under French criminal investigation for corruption of a foreign public official.

[Pictured below: Bill Gates, Terje Rød-Larsen, Jeffrey Epstein, former Gates scientific advisor Boris Nikolic and Thorbjørn Jagland - Source: Epstein Files]Image
Read 10 tweets
Mar 19
1/🚨 THEY CALLED IT ANTISEMITIC. EPSTEIN SAID IT FOUR YEARS EARLIER.

In July 2023, RFK Jr. was condemned as antisemitic for saying the U.S. is developing ethnically targeted bioweapons.

In March 2019 — four years earlier — Jeffrey Epstein said the same thing to a European arms official.

The difference: Epstein had operational reasons to know.

Here's what the federal archive shows. 🧵👇Image
Image
2/📄 EFTA00783986. March 3, 2019. Four months before Epstein's arrest.

He's iMessaging a senior OSCE official — the 57-member-state body that monitors arms control across Europe.

Epstein describes warfare evolving century by century: physics → biology → information.

Then:

"Next is personal level. So attacking only blue eyed people becomes possible. Or those with Jewish genes. Also soon possible."

The official replied: "Crazy."

Epstein didn't say it was wrong. He said it was coming.

🔗 justice.gov/epstein → search EFTA00783986 justice.gov/epstein/files/…Image
3/🔬 Here's why this matters.

A statement like this means different things depending on who's making it.

From a layperson → speculation.

From someone inside the research infrastructure → assessment.

The federal archive documents which category Epstein was in.

What follows is a timeline. Every Bates number is verifiable. 👇
Read 11 tweets
Mar 18
1/🚨 25 years ago Congressman Dennis Kucinich named the prohibition of 'Chemtrails' and other 'exotic weapons systems' into law (H.R. 2977)

10 years ago the DNC put my 'Chemtrail Conspiracy' research on a joke list.

Today it's on the front page of the Daily Mail.

This is the full arc — and it's not over. 🧵👇Image
2/ In 2001, Congressman Dennis Kucinich introduced H.R. 2977 — the Space Preservation Act.

For the first time in U.S. history, the word "chemtrails" appeared explicitly in a government document.

The provision was quietly removed in later revisions.

Kucinich was dismissed as fringe. His warning was a legislative blueprint.

🔗sayerji.substack.com/p/when-chemtra…Image
Image
2/ In 2015, GreenMedInfo published: "Why the 'Chemtrail Conspiracy' Is Real."

It cited: 📁 Declassified military programs
🧪 Patent filings
🔬 Peer-reviewed coal fly ash analysis

In 2016, the DNC put it on an internal "conspiracy theory" list — alongside flat earth and the claim the Beatles never existed.

No scientific rebuttal. Just mockery.

🔗GreenMedinfo.com article: greenmedinfo.com/blog/why-chemt…

🔗Wikileaks DNC email: wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/ema…Image
Image
Read 12 tweets
Mar 16
1/🚨 Peter Thiel just called the Giving Pledge an "Epstein-adjacent, fake Boomer club."

Federal documents show he wasn't being provocative.

Epstein literally designed a business plan to help Bll Gates capture tens of billions of dollars of Giving Pledge money — in his own words, with Bates numbers.

Here's what the files show 🧵👇Image
2/💰 Feb 17, 2011. Epstein to JPMorgan — three months after the Giving Pledge launched:

"They all have a tax advisor, but have no real clue on how to give it away."

$60+ billion pledged. No mechanism to deliver it.

Epstein saw the gap. He intended to fill it. [EFTA00904740] justice.gov/epstein/files/…Image
3 / He told Gates directly what the vehicle was for:

"You can save taxes. A DAF with you is the pinnacle of their giving lives. The leverage is as great as increasing govt spending."

Not philanthropy. A theory of power — charity-sized impact with zero democratic accountability. [EFTA01003196] justice.gov/epstein/files/…Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(