Gov. Walz is again inflaming the mob. He is effectively declaring this to be the murder of a citizen who had a permit to carry this weapon. He is saying that the state not the federal government will control the investigation. He does not have that authority...
...The state can clearly have a parallel investigation and the federal government can do a joint investigation. However, he cannot dictate how or who will conduct the investigation...
...With thousands in the streets, Walz just did all that he could to give them license for their rage. Most of us would never call this a lawful or unlawful shooting based on one videotape...
...Walz calling for his own investigation is a bit odd when he is actively engaged in his version of Red Queen justice of a "sentence first -- verdict afterwards...
...Walz just said "quit referring to these people as law enforcement." That is a new low from the governor. These are law enforcement officers who put their lives on the line every day. To say that they are not law enforcement is to further enable the rage...
...Walz just said we are being "shot in the face coming out of donut shops." This is not a presser, it is a rage fest by Walz...
...Bob Jacobson just admitted that they had to leave the crime scene because they did not have enough personnel to control the area. That is quite an admission after the Governor said that he had all of the personnel he needed to keep the peace. They could not even hold a crime scene without retreating...
...Walz is blaming the feds for creating "chaos" and then leaving the scene. It ignores the lack of coordination and assistance from the state in these operations...
...Walz is saying that they are "slandering this individual" and saying that the federal government "does not want you to trust your eyes and ears." In other words, he is conveying, again, that the facts are clear from the video. ..
......Once again, it is not. We cannot see the subject's hands and do not know what was unfolding in this struggle on the grounds to reach a decision either way...
...I am still dumbfounded by Walz's presser. It was logically incoherent. He was calling for a state investigation while telling citizens to believe their own eyes based on a video taken from across the street through a window...
...The video (again shot from across the street over cars) does not show what the man is doing as he obviously resists his arrest. Yet Walz offers a sputtering, chest-thumping press conference that insisted that these officers should not be viewed as actual law enforcement.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Sen Rand Paul is systematically laying out the case of Fauci's record of contradictions and duplicity. I previously noted that what was most disturbing about Fauci's record was his silence as the media and academic groups attacked scientists who raised doubts about the origin theories and COVID measures. They were fired or removed from positions despite being later vindicated. Fauci, who was clearly obsessed with his own fame, said nothing to defend such dissenters...
...The new evidence shows a striking disconnect between what Fauci was saying publicly and what he was saying privately, including in his own diary entries. It also shows a disturbing level of coordination with media figures in maintaining the public narrative...
...Paul just noted that Fauci's assistant said that she deleted "tons" of records while Fauci denied such destruction. He also noted that Fauci told his associates to delete communications "after reading it." He reminded Fauci that it is a crime to destroy records...
Sen. John Cornyn is a key vote in the Todd Blanche and is pressing Todd Blanche on the Trump settlement. Many of us have raised concerns over aspects of that settlement, but Blanche confirmed that the weaponization fund under the agreement has not and will not be used...
...Cornyn, however, is noting that the President has not expressly waived that fund provision. However, Blanche has said that there is no chance, even with litigation, that there can be a "revival of the fund" which was never actually funded or used...
...Blanche has emphasized that this was the first case where a president's taxes were illegally released, an act that was criminally prosecuted. He defended the immunity provision in the settlement as standard for such settlements when pressed by Sen. Durbin...
We have twelve cases still in the pipeline for Supreme Court decisions today. This is unlikely to be the last day of the term, but I will be covering the cases at 10 am.
...Some have asked about my predictions on birthright citizens and the transgender cases. The odds are still against the Administration on birthright citizenship. The Chief may take that case and he seemed highly skeptical. On the transgender cases, I am betting for the states in being able to limit sports to biological sex...
...On the delay, it is often common for the Court to add days. Sometimes the release is delayed by dissenting opinions. However, the Court often holds major cases for the last day. The Supreme Court is not without its sense of theater...
If California hits its target, “LGBT-owned businesses” will receive $633 million in contracts. Putting aside the imposition of such agendas on companies at a time of rising energy costs, the certification process for being an LGBT business is astonishing. jonathanturley.org/2026/06/18/gay…
...Keep in mind that we have other major opinions, including the possible overturning of Humphrey's Executor in Trump v. Slaughter...
In responding to a challenge from Sen. Fetterman to prove that he did not send naked pictures to women, Graham Platner immediately raised the Jews, declaring that Fetterman is a tool of AIPAC. It appears that the tattoo may be obscured, but a certain obsession remains...
...Graham wrote that Fetterman is not disliked due to his hoodie: "It's not the hoodie, dude. It's because you've become a stooge for AIPAC and the Republican party." Notably, it is the same narrative of his defenders.
...Graham is accused of assault, degrading women, defaming veterans, mocking rape victims, praising Hamas, and ridiculing rural people. However, the real problem is again AIPAC and the Jews?
I strongly disagree with the push for a constitutional amendment to bar foreign-born legislators. foxnews.com/politics/mace-… While I have suggested the possible tinyurl.com/f86u4tce, I cannot think of anything more antithetical to our founding than barring foreign-born citizens from Congress. As a nation of immigrants, it is a reaffirmation of our heritage to have these citizens serve in government...
...Such an amendment would bar members ranging from Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, to Victoria Spartz, R-Ind. to Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., to Young Kim, R-Calif.. Regardless of their politics or controversies, they represent inspiring achievements in their communities and a reaffirmation of our core values.
...The founders themselves were immigrants and many foreign-born citizens have served with great distinction in our military and our government.