1/ π¨ Ever wonder how a "pandemic response" worth hundreds of billions appeared fully formed in 2020 β with the vaccines, the surveillance, the financing, the governance all ready to go?
Buried in the Epstein files is a 14-page JPMorgan collaborative proposal with the Gates Foundation called PROJECT MOLECULE.
βΌοΈIt proposed a permanent, privately governed, transnational vehicle β linking the Gates Foundation, offshore entities, billionaire committees, and $150 million in biological interventions: vaccines, surveillance networks, and disease eradication campaigns across sovereign nations.
Not leaked. Disclosed under federal legal process. Three sets of Bates stamps.
In Part I, I showed you the emails β Epstein coaching JPMorgan and Gates on the design. Today I'll show you what those emails produced.
Here's what they built β and who was at the table. π§΅π
Buried in the Epstein files is a 14-page JPMorgan collaborative proposal with the Gates Foundation called PROJECT MOLECULE.
βΌοΈIt proposed a permanent, privately governed, transnational vehicle β linking the Gates Foundation, offshore entities, billionaire committees, and $150 million in biological interventions: vaccines, surveillance networks, and disease eradication campaigns across sovereign nations.
Not leaked. Disclosed under federal legal process. Three sets of Bates stamps.
In Part I, I showed you the emails β Epstein coaching JPMorgan and Gates on the design. Today I'll show you what those emails produced.
Here's what they built β and who was at the table. π§΅π
2/7 β TWO CHANNELS, ONE ARCHITECTURE
August 17, 2011: Epstein emails Mary Erdoes β CEO of JPMorgan's $2 TRILLION asset management division β describing a fund that would "exist in perpetuity, with succession controls."
Fourteen days later, the Project Molecule deck lands. Page 3, Executive Summary: "Allow for perpetual operation and governance succession."
Epstein's email: "We should be ready with an offshore arm β especially for vaccines."
The deck, page 4: "A foreign private charitable foundation in a tax neutral jurisdiction."
Epstein's email: Donor anonymity.
The deck, page 5: "Permit donor anonymity."
Same month. Same bank division. Same client. One channel informal β through a convicted sex offender. One channel formal β polished, stamped Version 13.
The email sketches the blueprint. The deck renders it in corporate detail. πepsteinfilez.com/pdf/8025cdd168β¦
August 17, 2011: Epstein emails Mary Erdoes β CEO of JPMorgan's $2 TRILLION asset management division β describing a fund that would "exist in perpetuity, with succession controls."
Fourteen days later, the Project Molecule deck lands. Page 3, Executive Summary: "Allow for perpetual operation and governance succession."
Epstein's email: "We should be ready with an offshore arm β especially for vaccines."
The deck, page 4: "A foreign private charitable foundation in a tax neutral jurisdiction."
Epstein's email: Donor anonymity.
The deck, page 5: "Permit donor anonymity."
Same month. Same bank division. Same client. One channel informal β through a convicted sex offender. One channel formal β polished, stamped Version 13.
The email sketches the blueprint. The deck renders it in corporate detail. πepsteinfilez.com/pdf/8025cdd168β¦
3/7 β COMMITTEES INSTEAD OF PARLIAMENTS
Project Molecule proposed FIVE layers of private governance β Board, Investment, Grant Distribution, Management, and Audit β forming a complete governing apparatus: legislative, executive, fiduciary, and oversight.
Proposed members:
Warren Buffett. George Kaiser. Melinda Gates (chair of grant distribution). Susan Rice (then U.S. Ambassador to the UN). Seth Berkley (CEO of Gavi). Jeffrey Sachs. Queen Rania of Jordan. Mary Erdoes.
These aren't retired philanthropists lending names to a letterhead. In 2011, they already governed β nations, alliances, corporations, multilateral institutions.
Project Molecule proposed giving them a second jurisdiction: biology.
No term limits. No electorate. No FOIA. Designed to outlive any elected government that might question it. π
Source: Project Molecule slide deck page 12: epsteinfilez.com/pdf/8025cdd168β¦
Project Molecule proposed FIVE layers of private governance β Board, Investment, Grant Distribution, Management, and Audit β forming a complete governing apparatus: legislative, executive, fiduciary, and oversight.
Proposed members:
Warren Buffett. George Kaiser. Melinda Gates (chair of grant distribution). Susan Rice (then U.S. Ambassador to the UN). Seth Berkley (CEO of Gavi). Jeffrey Sachs. Queen Rania of Jordan. Mary Erdoes.
These aren't retired philanthropists lending names to a letterhead. In 2011, they already governed β nations, alliances, corporations, multilateral institutions.
Project Molecule proposed giving them a second jurisdiction: biology.
No term limits. No electorate. No FOIA. Designed to outlive any elected government that might question it. π
Source: Project Molecule slide deck page 12: epsteinfilez.com/pdf/8025cdd168β¦
4/7 β WHERE THE MONEY GOES
Page 9 is the slide that turns financial abstraction into something you can feel in your stomach.
Under "Collaborative Philanthropy" β $150 million in specific biological interventions:
$40M β Polio vaccines in Afghanistan
$40M β Polio vaccines in Pakistan
$20M β "Finance the surveillance network in Pakistan"
$20M β MenAfriVac in Africa
$30M β Rotavirus vaccines in Latin America
Read the third line again.
"Finance the surveillance network."
Not "support." Not "contribute to." FINANCE.
A surveillance network in a sovereign nation β built, funded, and owned by a private charitable entity governed from a boardroom in New York. π‘
Page 9 is the slide that turns financial abstraction into something you can feel in your stomach.
Under "Collaborative Philanthropy" β $150 million in specific biological interventions:
$40M β Polio vaccines in Afghanistan
$40M β Polio vaccines in Pakistan
$20M β "Finance the surveillance network in Pakistan"
$20M β MenAfriVac in Africa
$30M β Rotavirus vaccines in Latin America
Read the third line again.
"Finance the surveillance network."
Not "support." Not "contribute to." FINANCE.
A surveillance network in a sovereign nation β built, funded, and owned by a private charitable entity governed from a boardroom in New York. π‘
5/7 β WHY PAKISTAN MATTERS
$60 million in biological operations directed at a single sovereign nation: vaccine procurement + surveillance infrastructure.
Now consider what was happening in Pakistan in 2011 β the same year this deck was drafted:
The CIA was running a FAKE hepatitis B vaccination campaign to collect DNA intelligence on bin Laden's compound.
The operation was exposed. Vaccination workers were murdered. Community trust in foreign health programs was permanently destroyed.
And Project Molecule proposed building foreign-funded biological surveillance in the same country where foreign-funded biological programs had just been weaponized by an intelligence agency.
The architects either knew β or their obliviousness is itself a form of institutional arrogance. π―
$60 million in biological operations directed at a single sovereign nation: vaccine procurement + surveillance infrastructure.
Now consider what was happening in Pakistan in 2011 β the same year this deck was drafted:
The CIA was running a FAKE hepatitis B vaccination campaign to collect DNA intelligence on bin Laden's compound.
The operation was exposed. Vaccination workers were murdered. Community trust in foreign health programs was permanently destroyed.
And Project Molecule proposed building foreign-funded biological surveillance in the same country where foreign-funded biological programs had just been weaponized by an intelligence agency.
The architects either knew β or their obliviousness is itself a form of institutional arrogance. π―
6/7 β THE CARPENTER AND THE TABLE
Epstein's name appears nowhere in the Project Molecule deck.
But here's how the relationship worked:
Feb 2011 β JPMorgan sends Epstein a structured questionnaire asking him to define the fund's architecture. He replies the same evening with a fully formed vision.
Aug 2011 β Erdoes emails him from vacation asking for answers before the 31st. She gets them the same night.
He coached them on Gates: "Bill is terribly frustrated." He dictated what to include: "additional money for vaccines."
He projected scale: "billions of dollars⦠tens of billions by year 4."
Project Molecule is the table. Polished, presented to the client β stripped of the carpenter's fingerprints. πͺ
Epstein's name appears nowhere in the Project Molecule deck.
But here's how the relationship worked:
Feb 2011 β JPMorgan sends Epstein a structured questionnaire asking him to define the fund's architecture. He replies the same evening with a fully formed vision.
Aug 2011 β Erdoes emails him from vacation asking for answers before the 31st. She gets them the same night.
He coached them on Gates: "Bill is terribly frustrated." He dictated what to include: "additional money for vaccines."
He projected scale: "billions of dollars⦠tens of billions by year 4."
Project Molecule is the table. Polished, presented to the client β stripped of the carpenter's fingerprints. πͺ
7/7 β THE QUESTION THAT WAS NEVER BUILT IN
Project Molecule is not evidence that pandemics were planned.
It is evidence that biology itself was being organized into an investable, governable system β with offshore entities, perpetual mandates, surveillance budgets, vaccine procurement by geography, and unified control over both the capital and the intervention.
The same institutions design the response, fund the response, measure the response, govern the response, and benefit from its permanence.
The question is not whether they would act in their own interest.
The question is: what mechanism was built into this architecture to ensure they don't?
The answer: none. The architecture was specifically designed to operate without one.
Full investigation with all source documents π
Part I Substack: BREAKING: The Epstein Files Illuminate a 20-Year Architecture Behind Pandemics as a Business Model β With Bill Gates at the Center of the Network: sayerji.substack.com/p/breaking-theβ¦
Part II Substack: Inside Project Molecule β How JPMorgan and the Gates Foundation Turned Biology into Investable Infrastructure: sayerji.substack.com/p/inside-projeβ¦
Project Molecule is not evidence that pandemics were planned.
It is evidence that biology itself was being organized into an investable, governable system β with offshore entities, perpetual mandates, surveillance budgets, vaccine procurement by geography, and unified control over both the capital and the intervention.
The same institutions design the response, fund the response, measure the response, govern the response, and benefit from its permanence.
The question is not whether they would act in their own interest.
The question is: what mechanism was built into this architecture to ensure they don't?
The answer: none. The architecture was specifically designed to operate without one.
Full investigation with all source documents π
Part I Substack: BREAKING: The Epstein Files Illuminate a 20-Year Architecture Behind Pandemics as a Business Model β With Bill Gates at the Center of the Network: sayerji.substack.com/p/breaking-theβ¦
Part II Substack: Inside Project Molecule β How JPMorgan and the Gates Foundation Turned Biology into Investable Infrastructure: sayerji.substack.com/p/inside-projeβ¦
Part I of this series:
https://twitter.com/sayerjigmi/status/2018374717426503946
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
γ
