David Hauser Profile picture
@dh
Feb 9 14 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Stop calling Big Tech powerful.

In 1600, a corporation got a piece of paper from the British king.

By 1800, it ruled India.

Not influenced.
RULED.

If you don’t know this story, you don’t understand power.
Let’s fix that:🧵 Image
Image
Here’s the part that sounds fake:

At their peak, the East India Company:
• Controlled large parts of India
• Collected taxes from millions of people
• Employed more than 260,000 soldiers

That was twice the size of Britain’s own army!

All of this… as a private company.
India at the time wasn't as we know them today.

In the 1700s, India was one of the richest regions on Earth...
Producing roughly a quarter of global GDP.

Cotton. Textiles. Spices. Trade routes.

They were the center of the world economy

The Company knew the value and chased it.Image
At first, the business model was simple:

• Buy goods cheap in India/Asia
• Sell them expensive in Europe
• Use armed ships to protect trade

That last part mattered.

Because once you bring guns into commerce, the game changes. Image
And that turning point came in 1757.

The Battle of Plassey.

A small Company force led by Robert Clive crushed the much larger army of Siraj-ud-Daulah.

Siraj-ud-Daulah was the ruler of Bengal...
One of the wealthiest regions in India!
After that, something unprecedented happened.

The Company was no longer "just trading" in Bengal.
They started running it.

But it doesn't stop there... Image
In 1765, the Mughal emperor granted the Company the Diwani.

That meant:
• The right to collect taxes
• Control over the region's revenue
• Authority over administration

A private firm was now collecting state taxes — protected by its own army.

The British East India Company had become government.Image
The scale was crazy.

A few hundred British officials, backed by Indian soldiers called sepoys, ruled over the people.

They ran:
• Courts
• Prisons
• Coin mints
• Bureaucracies

The Company even had its own navy. Image
By the early 1800s, the East India Company had become a full corporate state.

They caused wars.
Signed treaties.
Raised armies.
And enforced laws.

Also, their territory was spreading rapidly across the subcontinent.

All while remaining a private company. Image
And yes — the system was brutal.

Tax pressure increased.
Local industries collapsed.
Famines followed.

In Bengal alone, millions died during a famine while Company revenues kept flowing.

As long as the revenue kept coming in, human cost was secondary.

This is where things started to go wrong...Image
By 1857, the strain snapped.

A massive rebellion broke out across northern India.
Company control cracked.
Britain panicked.

Not because the Company was immoral...

But because they had become too powerful to fail safely. Image
In 1858, Britain made a final decision.

The East India Company was to be dissolved.
Its assets, armies, and territories taken over by the Crown.

Corporate rule was replaced by direct imperial rule.

Kickstarting the British Imperial machine that colonized most of Asia and Africa.Image
No company before or since has come close.

A private firm that:
• Ruled nations
• Fielded massive armies
• Controlled global trade

The East India Company wasn’t just a business story.

It was the moment the world learned what happens when commerce grows into power.
Follow @dh for more stories about how money actually moves in business.

Join 15,000+ entrepreneurs at for weekly insights on business, finance, and strategy.davidhauser.com

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Hauser

David Hauser Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dh

Feb 3
America’s biggest fear is losing the Dollar as global money.

But here’s the paradox:

The dollar became so powerful only after it became "Worthless".

It all started on August 15, 1971, when Richard Nixon went on television... Image
He didn’t announce the usual.
War, recession, or a market crash.

He announced something far bigger:

Money was about to change forever.

With one decision, the U.S. did something no empire had ever done voluntarily.

They broke money’s link to gold.
To understand why this mattered, we have to rewind.

After World War II, the world ran on a simple deal;

Bretton Woods.

• The U.S. dollar = $35 per ounce of gold
• Other currencies = pegged to the dollar
• Governments could trade dollars for real gold Image
Read 17 tweets
Jan 30
Modern capitalism wasn't invented by bankers...

It was invented in Edward Lloyd's coffeehouse in 1688.

He wasn’t a banker.
He wasn’t an economist.

But how he ran his coffeehouse changed how business works to this day. Image
Image
Here's some context:

Back then, overseas trade was brutal.

If you sent a ship across the ocean and it didn’t come back, you were done.
No second chances. No safety net.

Storms. Pirates. Wars.
One bad trip could wipe out everything you owned.
The biggest problem wasn’t ambition.
It was huge risk margins.

In 1686, Edward Lloyd opened a coffeehouse near the River Thames in London.

Then he noticed a pattern...

Certain people kept coming back to his place:

• Ship captains
• Merchants
• Shipowners Image
Read 16 tweets
Sep 17, 2025
This professor discovered why smart people make terrible decisions.

It costs them millions in salary, relationships, and opportunities.

But he found the trick to beat it.

It's not about being intelligent - it's about thinking differently.

Here's the mental framework: Image
Image
Here's what most people get wrong...

They think being "rational" means making the best choice for themselves.

But Ben Polak proves this leads to disaster 70% of the time.

The Prisoner's Dilemma shows why individual logic creates collective failure.
Two prisoners, separate cells, same choice:

Cooperate (stay silent) or defect (betray the other).

Logic says: "Betray them before they betray me."

Result: Both get worse outcomes than if they'd cooperated.

Sound familiar? It's everywhere in business:
Read 12 tweets
Aug 16, 2025
AI founders love to say: “Don’t worry, AI will create more jobs.”

Of course — it’s good for business. Keeps you calm. Makes you trust their product.

But Anthropic’s CEO? The guy building Claude 4?

He just said AI could erase 50% of entry-level white-collar jobs in 5 years.🧵 Image
The person saying this isn’t a random commentator.

It’s Dario Amodei — CEO of Anthropic, the company behind Claude AI.

Claude isn’t just a chatbot.

It can code for hours, review legal contracts, run deep financial analysis, and even simulate human persuasion.
If the builder says jobs are in danger, he’s speaking from what he sees being tested every day.

Amodei’s timeline is shockingly short: 1 to 5 years.

That’s barely enough time for a college degree. Image
Read 16 tweets
Aug 8, 2025
Over 300 million jobs could disappear by 2030.

Not because of war.
Not because of politics.
But because of Artificial Intelligence.

And here’s the truth most people won’t say:

It’s already happening.

Here are 8 jobs AI is coming for — and 5 that might survive (for now):🧵 Image
We’ve been here before.

This isn’t the first time technology changed everything.

Every few decades, something new is invented—
And millions of jobs disappear.

But new ones also appear.

The key is to understand the pattern—so you can prepare.

Here's what I mean:
In the early 1800s, the Industrial Revolution introduced machines into textile factories.

Machines could weave faster and cheaper than human hands.

Thousands of skilled weavers lost their jobs.

That’s where the term “Luddite” came from.
It means a person who is opposed to or destroys technology.

Many English workers destroyed machines out of fear.

But it didn’t stop the change.
They still lost their jobs.
Read 21 tweets
Jul 18, 2025
Everyone laughed when they stayed broke on purpose.

No new cars. No holidays. Just hoodies, grit, and obsession.

Years later, those same people watched them walk away with $600M.

This wasn’t luck.
It was the long game.
And most people can't handle it.🧵 Image
In the early 2000s, Simon & Tah-nee were selling streetwear at local markets.

They didn't have big investors or a business background.

Just a deep love for street culture — and a relentless work ethic.

But here’s the thing most people miss:
Their clothe sales focused on building something much bigger.

From day one, they were disciplined with money.

They lived modestly. Paid themselves little.

Instead of upgrading cars or homes, they reinvested nearly every dollar into growing the brand. Image
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(