This is going to keep happening because the trans movement is a magnet for alienated and aggrieved youth. The movement then supercharges their disaffection and grievance by setting young people on an impossible quest to defy reality and telling them the world is out to get them.
When reality refuses to be defied, young people suffer. They can't blame the movement that instilled such quixotic hopes. Many blame themselves for not overcoming their internalized transphobia. Others lash out, spurred on by the movement's ugly embrace of 'retributive' violence.
You could do a whole dissertation cataloging the violent threats, the mock guillotines trans activists carry proudly at protests, the very real pink-and-blue assault rifles, sledgehammers, battle axes, barbed wire-wrapped baseball bats...
The truth is that the subculture that has grown up around trans identities too often excuses, legitimises, and even glorifies violence. unherd.com/newsroom/the-v…
That includes violence directed at the self—where self-harm and suicide demonstrate sincerity and commitment in the face of adversity—and violence directed outward at perceived enemies. When a community mythologizes martyrs, that community will recruit martyrs.
In the wake of not even the last mass shooting carried out by a trans-id person (in fact, several such mass shootings ago), an anon Redditor tried to break through the trans community's culture of phobia indoctrination and incitement:
“The murderous and suicidal rhetoric, the violence against women and children, should’ve stopped years ago. Another good time to discontinue it would be now.”
Minutes later, the comment disappeared. Reddit mods had intervened. Three years ago, in the wake of the shooting at a Nashville elementary school, would have been a good time to put the culture of incitement to violence on ice. Another good time would be now.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I have a tiny public profile but still enough to attract dozens of comments on my weight over the years, mostly well-meaning expressions of concern but more than a few more accurately characterized as nasty/accusatory/prying, and it genuinely does suck to feel, like, ok, I guess people think I look really unwell? But also Grande is an icon to so many impressionable young girls and her fans need to hear that this isn't healthy. thefp.com/p/in-wicked-th…
I had severe anorexia as a teenager and ultimately pulled myself out of it when I realized the two little girls I nannied for looked up to me and learned from me and I didn't want them to learn *that.* I knew I had a responsibility to tell them that I was sick and then to actually get better.
Now I am just regular skinny and apparently some people still think I look like a freak, but whatever. That's a different story.
I really wish the gender-related executive orders and messaging were taking into account that we're dealing with a radicalized population that includes a lot of very vulnerable, psychologically unwell young people who've been told for years to expect a "trans genocide."
I don't think we have a mass-deradicalization playbook. But imperative to be as clear and specific about what's being proposed and as compassionate about the "why?" as possible.
I realize for Trump, the appeal *is* the culture war. But many of the people working behind the scenes to craft these executive orders & shape public messaging should know better than to use inflammatory language. Describing what's happening in plain English is damning enough.
Every now and then, I check in on Room of One's Own bookstore in Madison, WI, which was a chill feminist bookstore until it sold a few years ago to someone going through a gender meltdown and everything went completely off the deep end.
They've still got a (righteously enforced) mask mandate. "Don't want to wear mask? That's okay, you just can't come in."
They regularly promote staff top-surgery fundraisers and whoever controls their Twitter accounts loves to forget all about books in favor of "slutty kinky horny queer" shitposting.
It turns out that Reed and I agree about one thing!
If you acknowledge that male rapists with prison-onset gender dysphoria* shouldn’t be housed with female prisoners and therefore aren’t really women, you’ve acknowledged that self-identification has limits.
*I didn't coin this but it's 👌
Same goes for sports: either transwomen are women—in which case they get to clobber female athletes in the boxing ring and snag medals and scholarships at all-state track meets—or they’re… not.
We regret to inform you that the positive outcomes data we promised would rescue our embattled field took a wrong turn & will not be arriving to save the day.
We will henceforth be shifting to a more “vibes-based” evaluation model, under the guise of “centering trans voices."
So far, the uptake of our global child-sterilization campaign has been disproportionately white 🥹 We promise to do better & start confusing & sterilizing more non-white children as soon as humanly possible. Please hold us accountable to our diversity, equity, & inclusion goals.
In addition to questions about trans, mental illness, and violence, which are -- as Leor points out -- delicate and tricky to unpick, there are serious concerns about trans as a *subculture* and violence.
Online trans spaces are soaked in violent imagery and rhetoric. This glorification of violence is justified by wildly exaggerated stories about trans persecution, mostly notably the wholly invented claim that we're currently living through a "trans genocide."
I've written about this before, including for @UnHerd: "The truth is that the subculture that has grown up around trans identities too often excuses, legitimises, and even glorifies violence..." unherd.com/thepost/the-vi…