Sayer Ji Profile picture
Feb 11 7 tweets 5 min read Read on X
1/7 🚨 BREAKING: The U.S. State Department just filed a sworn record in federal court calling the UK-based Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) and its CEO Imran Ahmed 'a key collaborator with the Biden administration on weaponizing the national security bureaucracy to censor U.S. citizens.'"

Not our words. The government's.

Certified under penalty of perjury. Signed by Secretary Rubio personally.

Here's what this means for every American. 🧵👇Image
Image
2/7 For 4 years they told us nobody coordinated anything.

The government was "just sharing views." The platforms were "just enforcing policies." CCDH was "just publishing reports."

3 weeks ago, CCDH told a Florida court it never even COMMUNICATED with the White House.

21 days later, the State Dept called its CEO a "key collaborator."

Both are now in the federal record. Only one can be true.

🔥 See it for yourself — what they told the court vs. what the government found:Image
3/7 CCDH's own leaked internal docs listed their priorities:

☠️ "Kill Musk's Twitter" 🇪🇺 "Trigger EU and UK regulatory action"

These aren't the words of a "watchdog." They're the objectives of a foreign organization running what its own staff called "black ops" against Americans.

And the State Dept confirmed they SUCCEEDED.

Read @thackerpd and @mtaibbi's original reporting on CCDH's leaked memo and election interference: disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/election-exc…Image
4/7 Their targets included RFK Jr. — now the Secretary of HHS. @SecKennedy @RobertKennedyJr

CCDH ran "black ops" to deplatform him. They lobbied Google to demonetize American media. They pressured every major platform to silence the people in his orbit — during the exact period he was building a political movement.

That's not content moderation. That's ELECTION INTERFERENCE by a foreign NGO.‼️Image
5/7 Remember Murthy v. Missouri? The Supreme Court said those plaintiffs couldn't prove the specific chain from government → platform → their injuries.

Our case — Finn v. Global Engagement Center — was built to fix that. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

Our names were on the list. The government cited the list. The platforms acted on the list.

🚨Now the State Dept's own sworn record confirms the chain. This is the case Murthy couldn't be.Image
6/7 CCDH's CEO accused us of "profiting from causing death." He also encouraged comparisons of the "disinformation dozen" to sexual predators, mass murders and a criminal network under Parliamentary privilege: sayerji.substack.com/p/when-parliam…

He never retracted it. Never substantiated it. Never corrected it.

Instead he REPEATED it in a second federal court filing — while telling a different court it was just "publication of reports."

The State Dept says he "successfully led efforts to lobby" and "pressure U.S. companies to restrict speech."

That's not publishing. That's an operation.Image
7/7 We are 6 people and a volunteer legal team against Google, Meta, CCDH, and the federal government.

If we win, the precedent protects EVERY American from government-coordinated censorship.

If we lose, the blueprint survives for the next crisis and the next inconvenient voices.

📖 Read the full analysis: sayerji.substack.com/p/the-governme…

💪 Support the case: givesendgo.com/deliberate-doz…
The Secretary of State just proved us right. Help us finish this — together.

🇺🇸If you believe in freedom of speech, due process, the freedom to assemble, and our constitutionally-supported rights as Americans, share this widely! @unhealthytruthImage

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sayer Ji

Sayer Ji Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sayerjigmi

Apr 2
1/🚨The U.S. government just signed a federal court order admitting it ran a secret censorship operation against its own citizens.

Most people think that's the end of the story.

It isn't. It's the beginning.

A thread every American needs to read.🧵👇 Image
Image
2/ What the decree actually says...

The Missouri v. Biden Consent Decree is real and significant.

It permanently prohibits the Surgeon General, CDC, and CISA from pressuring social media platforms to suppress protected American speech.

The government signed it. A federal judge enforces it.

But read the fine print.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice…Image
3/ The decree covers 3 agencies. 5 platforms. Named plaintiffs only.

It says NOTHING about:

🔴 Foreign NGOs publishing fraudulent hit lists
🔴 Dark money funding those NGOs
🔴 Government officials amplifying their reports
🔴 Cross-border legal proceedings targeting American citizens for writing articles

The machine is still running.
Read 7 tweets
Mar 28
1/🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Federal documents, unreported until now, show Bill Gates flew to Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach estate in 2013 — alone, without his security team, on Epstein's private plane.

Here is the full record of what surrounded that visit.
🧵👇 Image
Image
2/ Let's be precise about who Epstein was in March 2013.

Not a man under suspicion. Not a controversial figure.

A convicted sexual predator.

His guilty plea: soliciting a minor for prostitution — a charge whose language tells you everything about who the system was protecting.

The girl was a victim.
The legal system called her a prostitute.Image
3/ Federal prosecutors had built a real case:

— 36 victims identified
— 34 confirmed minors
— 53-page federal indictment drafted
— 82-page prosecution memo ready

None of it was ever filed.

Epstein served 13 months — leaving jail 6 days a week.

His victims were still fighting in federal court for the right to be heard.

While all of that was on the public record — Gates flew to his house.Image
Image
Read 11 tweets
Mar 26
1/🚨Every outlet covering the Rothschild raid this week used the same word: "contact."

Suspicious contact. Alleged contact. Contact under investigation.

The federal documents don't describe contact.

They describe a pipeline. Intelligence flowing one direction. Money flowing the other. The same channel. For years. 🧵👇Image
2/10 December 2015.

The Rothschild bank wires $10 million to Epstein's Virgin Islands company.

Three days later, Epstein forwards a UN official's personal credit union account details to his financial manager with one annotation:

"250k."

📄 EFTA_R1_01591069 justice.gov/epstein/files/…
📄 EFTA_R1_00006537 justice.gov/epstein/files/…

Same pipeline. Both directions. Three days apart.Image
3/10 The UN official receiving $250,000: Terje Rød-Larsen — UN Special Envoy, architect of the Oslo Accords.

The man who routed the banking details: Fabrice Aidan — French diplomat, former Rothschild employee, serving UN Special Assistant.

The same Fabrice Aidan now under French criminal investigation for corruption of a foreign public official.

[Pictured below: Bill Gates, Terje Rød-Larsen, Jeffrey Epstein, former Gates scientific advisor Boris Nikolic and Thorbjørn Jagland - Source: Epstein Files]Image
Read 10 tweets
Mar 19
1/🚨 THEY CALLED IT ANTISEMITIC. EPSTEIN SAID IT FOUR YEARS EARLIER.

In July 2023, RFK Jr. was condemned as antisemitic for saying the U.S. is developing ethnically targeted bioweapons.

In March 2019 — four years earlier — Jeffrey Epstein said the same thing to a European arms official.

The difference: Epstein had operational reasons to know.

Here's what the federal archive shows. 🧵👇Image
Image
2/📄 EFTA00783986. March 3, 2019. Four months before Epstein's arrest.

He's iMessaging a senior OSCE official — the 57-member-state body that monitors arms control across Europe.

Epstein describes warfare evolving century by century: physics → biology → information.

Then:

"Next is personal level. So attacking only blue eyed people becomes possible. Or those with Jewish genes. Also soon possible."

The official replied: "Crazy."

Epstein didn't say it was wrong. He said it was coming.

🔗 justice.gov/epstein → search EFTA00783986 justice.gov/epstein/files/…Image
3/🔬 Here's why this matters.

A statement like this means different things depending on who's making it.

From a layperson → speculation.

From someone inside the research infrastructure → assessment.

The federal archive documents which category Epstein was in.

What follows is a timeline. Every Bates number is verifiable. 👇
Read 11 tweets
Mar 18
1/🚨 25 years ago Congressman Dennis Kucinich named the prohibition of 'Chemtrails' and other 'exotic weapons systems' into law (H.R. 2977)

10 years ago the DNC put my 'Chemtrail Conspiracy' research on a joke list.

Today it's on the front page of the Daily Mail.

This is the full arc — and it's not over. 🧵👇Image
2/ In 2001, Congressman Dennis Kucinich introduced H.R. 2977 — the Space Preservation Act.

For the first time in U.S. history, the word "chemtrails" appeared explicitly in a government document.

The provision was quietly removed in later revisions.

Kucinich was dismissed as fringe. His warning was a legislative blueprint.

🔗sayerji.substack.com/p/when-chemtra…Image
Image
2/ In 2015, GreenMedInfo published: "Why the 'Chemtrail Conspiracy' Is Real."

It cited: 📁 Declassified military programs
🧪 Patent filings
🔬 Peer-reviewed coal fly ash analysis

In 2016, the DNC put it on an internal "conspiracy theory" list — alongside flat earth and the claim the Beatles never existed.

No scientific rebuttal. Just mockery.

🔗GreenMedinfo.com article: greenmedinfo.com/blog/why-chemt…

🔗Wikileaks DNC email: wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/ema…Image
Image
Read 12 tweets
Mar 16
1/🚨 Peter Thiel just called the Giving Pledge an "Epstein-adjacent, fake Boomer club."

Federal documents show he wasn't being provocative.

Epstein literally designed a business plan to help Bll Gates capture tens of billions of dollars of Giving Pledge money — in his own words, with Bates numbers.

Here's what the files show 🧵👇Image
2/💰 Feb 17, 2011. Epstein to JPMorgan — three months after the Giving Pledge launched:

"They all have a tax advisor, but have no real clue on how to give it away."

$60+ billion pledged. No mechanism to deliver it.

Epstein saw the gap. He intended to fill it. [EFTA00904740] justice.gov/epstein/files/…Image
3 / He told Gates directly what the vehicle was for:

"You can save taxes. A DAF with you is the pinnacle of their giving lives. The leverage is as great as increasing govt spending."

Not philanthropy. A theory of power — charity-sized impact with zero democratic accountability. [EFTA01003196] justice.gov/epstein/files/…Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(