1/🚨"None of us knew the depth and the darkness." — Keir Starmer, on Jeffrey Epstein's British connections.
Seema Misra was jailed while pregnant. Sub-postmasters lost their homes and livelihoods. Jimmy Savile abused children for decades.
Every time, Starmer was running the institution responsible. Every time: "I didn't know."
Now it's Epstein. And the documents tell a very different story.🧵👇
2/11
🚨 HERE'S WHAT JUST BROKE:
Documents released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act show Britain's National Crime Agency was running a classified intelligence operation on Epstein's British connections — from inside the British Embassy in Washington, D.C.
Not a tip. Not a rumour. Not informal cooperation.
A formal, classified, embassy-to-FBI intelligence operation. Beginning January 2020.
3/11
The NCA built a financial intelligence pipeline — UK Financial Intelligence Unit to America's FinCEN — catching Epstein-linked transactions that US institutions may have missed.
British banks were flagging suspicious activity on people in Epstein's immediate circle.
Internal NCA emails show officers coordinating with the NSPCC over whether a parallel British investigation would affect FBI operations.
→ Jan 2020: NCA begins classified Epstein operation from the British Embassy
→ Apr 2020: Starmer becomes Labour leader
→ Jul 2024: Starmer becomes PM
→ Dec 2024: Starmer appoints Mandelson as ambassador — to the embassy where the operation was running
→ Sep 2025: Starmer fires Mandelson
→ Jan 2026: Documents reveal what the government knew all along
🚨Nearly five years of classified intelligence. And he sent Mandelson to the Washington D.C. building it was coming from.
5/11
Now ask yourself: what kind of security vetting for a Washington ambassadorship doesn't access the NCA's own classified intelligence on the most high-profile Epstein associate in British public life?
Either it did — and Starmer appointed him anyway.
Or it didn't — and the vetting system excluded the UK's own Epstein investigation from screening the UK's most prominent Epstein connection.
Both answers are devastating.
6/11
And Starmer can't claim he doesn't understand how this system works. He ran it.
From 2008–2013, he was Director of Public Prosecutions — head of the Crown Prosecution Service.
The CPS prosecutes every case the NCA investigates. Under statute, the DPP issues disclosure notices — NCA officers execute them. The DPP authorizes warrants — NCA officers carry them out.
Due diligence wasn't part of his job. It was his entire job.
7/11
But here's the pattern that should alarm every person in Britain.
Post Office Horizon: The CPS prosecuted sub-postmasters on data from a system known to be faulty — while Starmer was DPP. Seema Misra was jailed in 2010. Pregnant. Conviction quashed 2021. At least 11 prosecutions on his watch. He had the statutory power to stop them.
8/11
Jimmy Savile: Britain's most prolific child abuser was reported to police while Starmer ran the CPS. The decision not to prosecute was made under his leadership. Savile died free. Hundreds of victims never saw justice.
"It never came close to crossing my desk."
The CPS says it destroyed the records.
See the pattern?
9/11
Horizon: "I didn't know." Records destroyed.
Savile: "I didn't know." Records destroyed.
Epstein: "None of us knew." The CPS destroyed his Washington trip records too.
Three catastrophic institutional failures. Three times the most vulnerable people — children, sub-postmasters, abuse victims — were failed. Three times the man at the top says he didn't know. Three times the records that could prove it are gone.
This is not bad luck. This is a pattern.
10/11
Compartmentalization doesn't explain it.
Compartmentalization protects active operations from political interference. It does not exist to shield a prime minister from his own government's intelligence during the appointment of an ambassador — to the very embassy running the operation.
He's asking you to believe that the system he personally ran for five years failed at the exact moment it mattered most.
Again.
11/11
"None of us knew."
The NCA knew. The British Embassy knew. The financial intelligence unit knew. The NSPCC was consulted. The CPS — the agency Starmer ran — exists by statute to know.
Sub-postmasters went to prison. Savile's victims never got justice. Mandelson got an ambassadorship.
And every time: "I didn't know." And every time: the records are gone.
Britain deserves an answer. In Parliament. Under oath.
1/🚨Two days ago, Congress summoned Bill Gates to testify under oath on May 19, 2026.
Chairman Comer's letter to Gates identifies five areas of inquiry — including how Epstein and Maxwell "sought to curry favor and exercise influence to protect their illegal activities."
The federal court record already answers that question.
Here is what Gates will need to answer for when he does. 🧵👇
2/📄The Document That Changes Everything
Gates didn't just meet Epstein.
He signed a formal legal agreement releasing Epstein's offshore entities from all past and future liability.
Then thanked him — emphatically — for advice to minimize documents.
Then confirmed a multimillion-dollar financial deal to him in writing.
A six-page agreement was addressed to William H. Gates at his bgc3 offices in Kirkland, WA.
The document states that Gates had specifically requested that Epstein — a registered sex offender — serve as Boris Nikolic's representative in all negotiations.
This was Gates' initiative.
What he authorized Epstein to access: any and all confidential information of the Gates Foundation and Melinda F. Gates personally — at Epstein's own discretion.
The agreement included a survival clause. These provisions were designed to bind Gates' estate and heirs after his death.
Gates gave a convicted sex offender authorized access to his wife's personal information — structured to outlast his own life.
1/🚨Jeffrey Epstein built a leverage file on Bill Gates.
It contained allegations about an STD. A request to secretly medicate Melinda without her consent. Gates' personal plea to destroy the emails.
Four days after delivering that intelligence, Epstein received a multimillion-dollar financial agreement from Gates. Three weeks later, Gates signed documents giving Epstein unlimited authorized access to all confidential information on Melinda Gates personally.
Then thanked him for advice to "minimize documents."
You can draw your own conclusions.
It's all in the federal court record. Gates testifies under oath May 19. 🧵👇
2/ The intelligence acquisition To understand the leverage, you need to understand how Epstein built it.
He didn't hack Gates. He didn't surveil him.
He recruited Gates' most trusted insider — chief science adviser Boris Nikolic — who handed Epstein everything.
Including material Gates thought was protected by attorney-client privilege.
It wasn't. Epstein wasn't a lawyer. He wrote that privilege claim himself.
Aug 25, 2013. Epstein to Boris: "What entity gave you the 500k."
Boris replied from his phone with:
▪️A $500K payment from Gates' personal bank account
▪️A concealed investment partnership called Eclipse funding a woman Melinda knew nothing about
▪️Wire transfer documentation Boris had at home
▪️His assessment: "She would be much more furious than on anything before if she finds out."
1/🚨BREAKING: The day after Congress summoned Bill Gates to testify about Epstein, a newly surfaced DOJ document shows Epstein describing joint MIT funding with Gates — and calling it "Deception."
This is the thread Congress needs to see. 🧵👇
2/ THE DOCUMENT
Document: EEFTA01957950 Date: September 15, 2013 From: Jeffrey Epstein To: Barnaby Marsh
"I will do some funding at MIT with gates. Deception signals. want to join"
This is not allegation. This is Epstein's own words — in a federal DOJ production.
1/ 🧵BREAKING: Previously unreported federal Epstein file emails reveal that Jeffrey Epstein claimed he personally killed cold fusion — the discovery that could have given the world clean, limitless energy from water.
Not through science. Through congressional defunding and a meeting with the head of the Mormon Church.
It's in the federal record. EFTA02437662. Previously unreported. Full story 👇
2/ October 1, 2009. One year after his sex offense conviction. Epstein writes to associate Al Seckel:
"regarding cold fusion. i killed pons years ago"
Seckel presses: "How did you kill him?"
Epstein's answer names a specific congressman, a specific funding fight, and the head of the Mormon Church.
3/ Epstein described lobbying Congress against the funding for Pons's research at the University of Utah, naming Rep. Wayne Owens (D-UT) and claiming he met with LDS Church leadership — because BYU's competing cold fusion program ran through the Church's governance.
This wasn't peer review. It was political assassination of a scientific career by a private citizen with no scientific credentials.