Tony Armstrong told ABC viewers the First Fleet committed genocide by intentionally introducing smallpox to Aboriginal people.
The foremost historian on the subject disagrees. So does the virus itself.
A thread on what happens when ideology replaces evidence 🧵
Armstrong's case rests on one primary source: Captain Watkin Tench, 1791.
Tench didn't accuse the British of intentional introduction. He listed it as a speculative origin — then called the idea "unworthy of consideration."
That's the foundation of the ABC's genocide claim.
The science alone dismantles it.
Smallpox cannot survive three weeks at 35°C and 65% humidity.
The First Fleet took eight months to reach Sydney Cove.
Summer temperatures before the 1789 outbreak regularly exceeded 40°C.
The virus would have been dead long before landfall.
Not one member of the First Fleet developed smallpox during the voyage or after arrival.
Smallpox leaves permanent facial scarring. It's one of the most visually documented diseases in history.
If it was on the fleet, someone would have shown it.
Then there's Tasmania.
If biological warfare was British policy, Tasmania — the site of the most violent colonial conflict — should have seen it deployed.
It didn't. Early Tasmanian settlers had zero smallpox cases.
Armstrong's theory has no answer for this.
Judy Campbell wrote the definitive history on this topic: Invisible Invaders (1998).
Her conclusion: "In the absence of any reliable evidence that smallpox was introduced into the Aboriginal population by the British in 1789... other sources must be explored."
Those other sources point to Indonesian fishermen.
Around 2,000 Macassan sailors traded with Aboriginal communities in the north every year.
They had sustained, documented contact with Aboriginal communities across the coastline.
The timeline fits.
Skilled Indonesian navigators could reach northern Australia from South Sulawesi in 10–15 days — within smallpox's incubation period.
The First Fleet took eight months to cover the same distance.
The virus cannot survive eight months.
This actually happened.
Smallpox did reach Aboriginal communities through Indonesian contact — in 1830 and again in 1860.
Campbell documented both outbreaks. The transmission route from the north was established and repeatable.
The 1789 outbreak followed the same pattern.
An Aboriginal man named Jack Davis from Port Essington recorded in 1870 that his people called smallpox "Meeha-meeha" — and that the disease had been on the Cobourg Peninsula "a long time ago."
That's the northern coastline. Closest to Indonesia. Furthest from Sydney Cove.
British doctors treated Aboriginal smallpox patients after the 1789 outbreak.
If the goal was extermination, this requires explanation.
Stuart Macintyre and Manning Clark — two of Australia's most eminent historians — both reject the intentional introduction thesis.
Armstrong's final claim: Australians won't confront their colonial history.
Colonisation is in the national curriculum. The ABC covers it extensively. Tens of thousands march on Australia Day every year.
The silence Armstrong describes does not exist.
What does exist is a public broadcaster presenting contested ideological claims as settled historical fact — without engaging the most authoritative scholarship on the subject.
That's a different problem. And it deserves a direct answer.
The problem isn't how much we talk about colonial history.
It's how rarely rigorous historical evidence is used by the people loudest in that conversation.
Read Luke Powell's excellent coverage of this topic here:
Australia's medical regulator @Ahpra secretly planned to embed gender ideology into its regulatory processes over a 3–5 year horizon.
All the while, it was gagging doctors who questioned child 'gender medicine'.
And fighting FOI requests to keep the plan hidden.
A thread. 🧵
The @australian obtained memos exposing the plan.
In them, AHPRA chief Justin Untersteiner said the regulator's engagement with trans lobby group ACON guides "the way we regulate and fulfil our purpose of ensuring the preservation of public safety."
ACON — formerly the AIDS Council of NSW — lost its @abcnews partnership this month after it emerged the national broadcaster's news and programming had been heavily shaped by the lobby group.
Finland tracked every gender-referred adolescent in the country for up to 25 years.
Their psychiatric needs didn't improve after 'gender reassignment'. They surged.
A landmark peer-reviewed study just dropped. Here's what it found. 🧵
The study, published this week in Acta Paediatrica, was led by Professor Riittakerttu Kaltiala of Tampere University Hospital.
Kaltiala has run Finland's youth gender clinic since 2011. She also served on the UK's Cass Review advisory board.
Finland centralises all gender identity assessments to two university hospitals.
Because health register reporting is mandatory and patients cannot opt out, the dataset captured the complete fate of every gender-referred adolescent in the country from 1996 to 2019.
Australia's National Construction Code 2025 will let developers replace up to half of all single-sex toilets in schools, workplaces, shopping centres and sports venues with "all-gender" facilities.
States have until 1 May to stop it.
Here's what's at stake 🧵
The Australian Building Codes Board released the NCC 2025 preview on 2 February.
Under clause F4D4(12), developers can swap out up to half of required male and female facilities for mixed-sex alternatives — voluntarily.
Voluntary for developers. Not for users.
Small buildings can replace both single-sex toilets with one mixed facility.
Larger buildings can convert up to half.
Each "all-gender" cubicle must be accessed from a shared circulation space and signed as "all gender".
Victoria just launched a hate crime inquiry targeting online speech — "transphobia," "toxic masculinities," "heteronormative oppression."
It passed 22-15. Labor backed the Greens.
Here's what's inside the terms of reference — and why it should alarm every Victorian. 🧵
The inquiry was proposed by the Greens and passed the upper house on 18 February.
The Legal and Social Issues Committee must report by 1 Sept 2026 on "the scale and scope of anti-LGBTQIA+ hate crimes occurring in Victoria."
Nine areas fall within its terms of reference.
One area targets those "creating and sharing online content steeped in racism, misogyny, transphobia, homophobia, far-right ideology and unhealthy masculinities."
Influencers, social media users, and digital platform owners are named as subjects of investigation.