Scripture pointedly prohibits this kind of "sharing" and "relationship" with false religions and those who perpetrate evil (which Islam is), except to speak the truth of the Gospel.
(2 Corinthians 6)
In no way are Christians called to be in shared communion with Islam, even the sanitized version described here that praises the idolatry of their mosques and suggests they, in any real sense, serve the same God.
📷
Too much is made out of Islam's profession of "one God," as if that somehow places them above other false religions.
The singularity in their approach is meaningless when they not only twist their god into something not even resembling the God of the Bible, but into something completely counter to the God of the Bible.
For context, Sikhs and Zoroastrists also profess "one God." They pray to "the Creator." Are Christians in communion with them, too?
As for moral striving (and that's a pretty big stretch when describing Islam), scripture teaches our righteous acts are filthy rags before God. There is no value outside of salvation in Christ.
And what good is a desire to "submit to God's will" if you believe his will is to follow a seventh-century barbarian (and that's being kind) who repeatedly lied about God to cover for his murderous evil and sexual degeneracy?
Every response to pleas to nominate better candidates is met with "what about John Fetterman," as if a single race means candidate quality is irrelevant.
But okay, let's talk about John Fetterman, because that race is very instructive.
1/
Fetterman was a bad candidate, but he had some positives in his favor. He was from Pittsburgh. He was a local mayor. He was the incumbent Lt. Gov. He also had deep union connections and a persona (as fake as it was) that he was working class.
2/
Mehmet Oz was seen as a grifter who moved to PA to run for Senate and who spent his career selling snake oil. No amount of smooth talking ever brought his incredibly low favorable ratings up throughout the campaign.
If Fetterman was a bad candidate, Oz was a terrible one
3/