Steadily escalating over the 80s, but exploding since Al-Aqsa Flood is a process of refractory genocidal projection, happening in tandem to the ongoing genocide of Palestinians, towards Shi'a, identified as the most intimate symbol-from-without of the Palestinian cause
While genocides are usually thought of within neatly delineated frames of victim groups, in practice, the naturally paranoiac genocidal process proceeds through binding various communities -- racial, religious, or political -- as bearers of guilt & targets for eradication
You have the dyadic figure of the Judeo-Bolshevik during WW2, the triadic murder of ethnic Viets, Champa Muslims, and "Viets in Khmer clothing" in Cambodia, and the regularized connection between "5th columns" and foreign aggressions in other genocides.
What we see now in Iran and esp. Lebanon is the reality produced by the colonial natsec vision of the "Shi'a Crescent" -- an imaginary similarly promoted and appropriated by forces on the grounds, including 🇱🇧's "govt" -- as a geography to be eliminated without restraint
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Very brief notes from an old presentation I never formalized, I think you have three general theories of the "special relationship" between the US and Israel:
1. Structural affinities: settler-colonialism, religious-colonial visions of the desert lands, Islamophobia, and anti-philosemitism syntax (Sayegh 1965; Abu Lughud & Abu Laban 1974; Said 1979; Sharif 1983; Said 1992; Massad 2005; Davis 2016; Hanieh 2024)
2. Strategic, Cold War security interests: anti-communism and socialist developmentalism denied (PFLP 1967; Said 1992; Chomsky 2006; Kadri 2015; Khalidi 2020; Hanieh 2024)
1. the failures of prior Arab resistance have been their pre-emptive and emotional character. They either engage in war without strategy or they break their strategy at every Israeli provocation
2. the best approach to undermining Israel is a "boiling the frog" approach. Engage as a support front causing protracted attritional damage that eventually leads to fissures and collapse among the Zentity. This strategy demands maintaining a sub-threshold response that doesn't
escalate the terms of the conflict, thereby forcing a primarily defensive war on behalf of Lebanon, while maintaining enough damage to become a persistent crisis for the regime.
Yahya Sinwar was just elected head of the political division of Hamas today, replacing the late Ismail Haniyeh, assassinated last week by an Israeli strike on Tehran. Seems like an opportune moment to do a overview of the institutional evolution of Hamas.
Yahya Sinwar was just elected head of the political division of Hamas today, replacing the late Ismail Haniyeh, assassinated last week by an Israeli strike on Tehran. Seems like an opportune moment to do a brief cover of the institutional evolution of Hamas.
Several years after
Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Hamas (an acronym for the Movement of Islamic Resistance) emerged out of the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood. While the Muslim Brotherhood had been an institutional presence among Palestinians, gaining presence among the refugee camps of
Going to highlight core takeaways from Jeremy Scahill's interview with Hamas officials, found here dropsitenews.com/p/on-the-recor…
Why a strategy of violence? While centrally identifying as a resistance organization, Hamas has often times reinterpreted what "resistance" is meant to entail, often reflecting internal struggles between factions and sub-organizations. In its early emergence, it largely argued
for non-violence in the context of the First Intifada. After the stalling of the uprising, the opening up of the Oslo Accords that threatened Palestinian claims to return, and the Hebron Mosque Massacre carried out by US-Israeli settler Baruch Goldstein, Hamas turned to violence
The Jewish Agency, headed by the Labor Zionists, would maintain a general policy of limiting German Jewry (derisively labeled "yekkes") from settling in Palestine; the perception was that German Jews would bring with them "assimilationist" and "bourgeois" attitudes, as Herzl had
warned in "The State of the Jews" (complaining of the 'bourgeois stock' of European Jews), just as Max Nordau would accuse these "integrated" Jews of destroying Jewish "racial purity" by way of miscegenation. German Jews that came were viewed with utter suspicion & often contempt