T. Greer Profile picture
Mar 17 4 tweets 1 min read Read on X
I spent most of the last week in the hospital and not reading the news.

Catching up on the Iran stuff now.

My main conclusion: the epistemic certainty you all have on this is *crazy.*
One of the helpful things that comes from reading blow-by-blow, day-by-day military histories is that you see how wildly assessments of past wars whose outcomes are now known changed as the wars progressed.
There are so many unknowns in this war. The fog of war is real. The war itself is just a few weeks old. Much can happen in another three weeks—or another six months.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with T. Greer

T. Greer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Scholars_Stage

Mar 7
This is a very good thought experiment. Who are the five authors that most 20th c writers have read but most 21st c writers have not?

What about 19th c writers?
The obvious answer is something like “the top 5 poets of each era” because 21st century writers do not consume much poetry.
But there are other options. Most 19th century authors would have read Carlyle, and you can make the case that a lot of 19th century prose is downstream his influence (see Moby Dick).
Read 10 tweets
Mar 5
The idea that the Iran operation was mostly about China, that it fundamentally changes Chinese perceptions of American strength, or that it has already altered the balance of power between China and America in any real way, is bizarre to me.
We know what metrics the Chinese judge their competition with the US by. We know the military measures they care about and we know the non-military elements of national power that they think are most important.
Very honestly: the upcoming war powers resolutions vote on Iran will likely matter more to Chinese perceptions of American capacity (if the admin fails to get the vote) than the actual military attacks on Iran. Not hard to predict the sort of analysis the Xie Tao types will write up.
Read 9 tweets
Jan 9
I would only want Rubio to run in 2028 if it is clear he can win. Too valuable a candidate to waste on a unwinnable election.

But it is insane to me that people are pushing Vance to run when Rubio is clearly the star player of this administration thus far.

My 2c.
Marco Rubio is the only Republican who can make basically every faction of the GOP happy.

He is pretty funny, doesn't come off as angry and resentful at the world. Very good on camera.

Performs under pressure. A competent statesman.
Has a much higher chance of getting the senate to do what he wants.

Has a much higher chance of getting the federal bureaucracy to do what he wants.
Read 7 tweets
Dec 30, 2025
Important brief from @Arranjnh for @ChinaBriefJT on the relationship between military power and the "new quality productive forces" that Xi Jinping has staked the future of the Chinese economy on. Image
If you have followed anything said by Chinese leaders since about 2020, you know that China has embarked on a grand quest to dominate 21st century science and technology. I wrote about that here: scholars-stage.org/saving-china-t…
The key idea here: a China that pioneers new technological frontiers and dominates high-industry manufacturing will grow itself out of its current economic problems and place itself at the center of the global economy for decades.
Read 13 tweets
Oct 28, 2025
I do not think China hawkery vs dovery is that well correlated with having lived in China.

I do think it is correlated with career inside China. Journalists who have lived in China are generally far more hawkish than academics who did, for example. It is not an accident that both Pottinger and Garnaut worked as China correspondents before they went into government.
If you have never been to China but your area of policy expertise is climate, you are probably pretty dovish on China. If you have never been to China but your area of policy expertise is military affairs, you are probably hawkish on China.
This makes sense in a way. If you have spent your career closely tracking the PLA's naval advances by looking at satellite photography and financial statements of Chinese naval firms, and have served as a sailor yourself, it would be very hard to not be a hawk, frankly.
Read 14 tweets
Oct 25, 2025
The other problem with Angelica’s post is that she has the causality reversed: thr Taiwanese nationalist movement did not form because foreigners created a historical narrative to justify it—foreigners took cues from TW nationalists not the other way around!
(This is also true for many bearish takes on China’s economy and politics: many ideas start with *Chinese* critics of the existing situation, get parlayed to their western friends in journalism/finance/think tank world, and then come to dominate the western debate about China).
There is this strange disbelief in Taiwanese agency in Angelica’s post: as if guys like Michael, who started as a blogger, could be responsible for the ideology of Taiwan’s largest political party!
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(