😱 Someone just open sourced an AI hedge fund where Warren Buffett, Michael Burry, Charlie Munger & 9 other investing legends debate every stock and then a Portfolio Manager makes the final call.
No Bloomberg Terminal. No $25K brokerage minimums. No invitation-only fund.
It's called AI Hedge Fund.
Type a ticker.
Eighteen AI agents modeled on the greatest investors in history tear it apart from every angle. Value, growth, momentum, sentiment, fundamentals, technicals, risk. They argue. They signal.
The Portfolio Manager synthesizes it all into a final decision with position sizing included.
Not a stock screener.
Not a price alert tool.
A full multi-agent investment committee that thinks like the people who beat the market for decades.
No guesswork. No hot takes. No single point of failure.
Here's who's in the room when you analyze a stock:
→ Ben Graham Agent hunts for hidden gems trading below intrinsic value with a margin of safety and only buys when the numbers scream cheap
→ Michael Burry Agent goes full contrarian, digging for deep value the market has completely missed or misunderstood
→ Cathie Wood Agent bets on disruption and exponential growth, ignores short-term noise, and focuses on 5-year technology curves
→ Charlie Munger Agent refuses to touch anything that isn't a wonderful business at a fair price with a brutal filter that very few stocks pass
→ Stanley Druckenmiller Agent hunts macro asymmetry, positions where the upside is massive and the downside is contained
→ Phil Fisher Agent runs deep "scuttlebutt" research, the qualitative signals most analysts never bother to find
→ The Risk Manager sets hard position limits based on portfolio-level exposure before any order is generated
→ The Portfolio Manager synthesizes all 12 investor signals plus 4 quantitative agents into a single final trade decision with sizing
Here's how it actually works:
Each legendary investor agent reads the same financial data and outputs a directional signal: bullish, bearish, or neutral, with a confidence score and written reasoning in that investor's exact style. The Valuation Agent calculates intrinsic value. The Sentiment Agent reads the market mood.
The Fundamentals Agent checks the balance sheet. The Technicals Agent reads the chart.
The Risk Manager reviews all signals, sets position limits, and only then does the Portfolio Manager produce the final order. Every decision is traceable. You can see exactly which agents agreed, which dissented, and why.
Here's the wildest part:
You can also run the Backtester, feeding it a historical date range and watching how the 18-agent committee would have traded AAPL, MSFT, or NVDA over any period. Munger says hold. Burry says buy more. Wood says trim and rotate. You see the whole debate, dated, reasoned, and resolved across years of history.
poetry run python src/main.py --ticker AAPL,MSFT,NVDA
Works with GPT-4o, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Groq, or local LLMs via Ollama. Free financial data for AAPL, GOOGL, MSFT, NVDA, and TSLA with no API key needed to start.
These 15 Claude prompts for video → thread → LinkedIn.
Tested on 5 pieces - 4x reach.
Here is the SIMPLE CLAUDE PROMPT PACK you don't want to miss:
1. The Transcript Goldmine Extractor
You are an expert content strategist with deep experience turning long-form video content into high-performing social media assets. I am going to give you a raw video transcript and I need you to analyze it before a single word of content is written.↳ Read the entire transcript first without doing anything and absorb the full argument, story, and flow before making any decisions
↳ Extract the 3 to 5 core ideas that have the strongest potential to stand alone as their own piece of content
↳ For each idea, write one punchy summary sentence, pull out the single most quotable line from the transcript, and identify the primary emotional trigger it activates such as curiosity, pain, aspiration, or identity
↳ Tag each idea clearly as Thread-ready, LinkedIn-ready, or Both and briefly explain why you gave it that tag
↳ Note which idea has the highest viral potential and which has the highest authority-building potential
↳ Output everything as a clean numbered list and do NOT rewrite or expand the content yet, only extract, label, and annotate
[PASTE TRANSCRIPT HERE]
2. The 12-Tweet Narrative Thread Formula
You are a professional X ghostwriter who specialises in threads that stop people mid-scroll and earn hundreds of bookmarks. Write a full 12-tweet thread based on the idea below. Every single tweet must earn the right to be read and if a tweet could be cut without losing meaning, rewrite it.
↳ Tweet 1 should be a bold, pattern-interrupting hook with no "I" as the first word and must open with a claim, number, or provocative statement that creates an immediate open loop
↳ Tweets 2 through 4 should establish the problem or common misconception and make the reader feel seen and slightly uncomfortable about what they have been getting wrong
↳ Tweets 5 through 9 should deliver the core insight broken into atomic, standalone steps where each tweet feels like a micro-revelation on its own
↳ Tweets 10 and 11 should ground everything with a real proof point, specific example, or data that makes the abstract concrete and believable
↳ Tweet 12 should close with a punchy, memorable line and a soft CTA that feels natural and not salesy
↳ Keep every tweet under 240 characters, cut all filler words, avoid em dashes, never write "in conclusion", and make each tweet create enough curiosity to pull the reader to the next one
🚨 BREAKING: MATTHEW BERMAN just released a video on how he runs his entire META ADS operation for $0/MONTH WITH OPENCLAW.
No agency. No VA. Just an AI agent that monitors, kills, scales, writes, and uploads ads autonomously.
Here's the system he built👇
He has been running Meta ads manually for 20 years.
He just packaged his entire workflow into 5 autonomous OpenClaw skills that replaced dozens of hours in Ads Manager every week.
The agent handles everything from health checks to creative uploads without human intervention.
Here's exactly what runs on autopilot in his setup every single day:
Step 1: Daily health check via social-cli
The agent wraps Meta's Marketing API and handles token refresh, pagination, and rate limits automatically.
Asks the same 5 questions Matthew used to ask Ads Manager every morning for 20 years:
→ Am I on track for my targets?
→ What campaigns are currently running?
→ Which ads are winning right now?
→ Which ones are bleeding money?
→ Is there any creative fatigue happening?
🤯 HOLY SHIT. I wasted WEEKS on deep research before discovering this.
I don't get why most people don't use PERPLEXITY for DEEP RESEARCH.
HERE are 10 prompts that turn it into a PhD-level research assistant (and save you weeks of work):
1. Domain-Master Overview Prompt
Act as a PhD-level researcher and domain expert in {topic}.
Your goal: build me a deep, structured understanding from first principles to current frontier debates.
In your answer:
Start with 1–2 paragraphs that define the field, its core questions, and why it matters.
Use bullet points to explain the 5–10 most important concepts, each with a 2–3 sentence explanation.
Add a short section called “Historical Milestones” with bullet points for key papers, breakthroughs, or events (include year and 1–2 sentence significance).
Finish with a section “Current Frontier & Open Problems” where you:
List 5–7 active research directions in bullet points.
For each, explain why it’s hard and what progress is being made.
End with a short paragraph summarizing “If I had 30 days to get dangerous in this field, here’s the exact learning plan I’d follow.
2. Literature Review Builder
You are my literature review assistant for {research question / topic}.
I want a structured, high-level literature map, not just a list of papers.
Please:
Start with one paragraph defining the precise scope of the question and adjacent areas you will ignore.
Create sections for 3–6 major themes or approaches in the literature, each with:
A short paragraph summarizing the idea.
Bullet points listing the most influential papers/reports (author, year, 1–2 sentence contribution).
Add a section “Methods & Data” summarizing in 1–2 paragraphs:
Typical methodologies used.
Common datasets or empirical settings.
Add a section “Points of Consensus vs Disagreement” using bullet points to contrast where the literature agrees and where it conflicts.