1/11. A thread on the definable points of friction between muslims and non-muslims in western democracies.
This is not intended to offend anyone, but we do need a frank and open debate about the points of friction between muslim and non-muslim communities in Britain. It's also high time everyone, including the muslim community, acknowledged the points of friction that exist and the legitimate concerns of ordinary non-muslims in Britain, if we are to avoid things breaking down further.
2/11. Sectarianism: Muslims, particularly from the areas of Afghanistan, Pakistan and the Levant create the impression that they have clear preference for issues in those countries/areas, and for other Muslims, over those of the country they have migrated to. This divides society.
3/11. Segregation: Muslim communities tend to treat girls and women, for example, differently to liberal western societies. This, and the very male dominated character of muslim communities, raises suspicions and offends Western societies.
4/11. Perception of Islam as Political: While Western societies operate on a secular model where religion is private, many muslims view Islam as all-encompassing, guiding their personal life, social interactions and political behaviour. I do not judge that in other countries, but Britons do not want their politics and laws shaped by sectarian Islam
5/11. Parallel Structures (linked to 3 above): Some muslims instinctively tend towards applying parallel legal systems e.g. Sharia, and towards making political decisions based on religious interpretation of Islam. This is what they have grown up with tin their countries of origin. But such an approach is often incompatible with the pluralistic principles of western democracy.
6/11. Respect: Some muslims demand respect for their religion and culture, but are often perceived as showing little respect for British historical and cultural locations, monuments and events.
The practice - which appears deliberate - of conducting muslim religious practices in or around Anglican sites, in Trafalgar Square and in other public spaces, together with the establishment of mosques and Muslim cultural centres in iconic British locations, is increasingly perceived as muslims planting their flag - their identity. This raises concerns of "occupation" and attempts to dominate and intimidate.
7/11. Hypocrisy: A small minority Muslims commit horrendous acts, whether of terror, child grooming or anything else, but when they do the condemnation, if any, from the Muslim community is muted.
Of course non-muslims also commit heinous crimes, but when a muslim is the victim there's an outcry.
8/11. The demand for protection against criticism: The demand by some in the Muslim community for legal protection against blasphemy of their religion is itself offensive to many non-muslims.
The failure of high profile members of the Muslim community to condemn such things as the appalling treatment of the Batley school teacher deepens the impression - and impressions are important - that Muslims expect to be treated differently and believe their religion justifies their actions.
9/11. Double standards: Animosity arises when Western publics observe christians being arrested for preaching or praying in public when muslim religious events, even those that block roads, occupy public spaces, intimidate or offend non-muslims, are permitted.
10/11 Extremism: Of course, only a very small minority of muslims turn to Islamic extremism and violence, but that small minority do form the greatest terror threat in the West. Then there are a number of "hate preachers", whose sermons appear across the internet, who encourage the dominance of Islam and the destruction of or dominance over western societies. In these circumstances, it is perhaps unrealistic to argue people should not hold any fear of Islam.
11/11. British authorities: I lay much of the fault of all this at the door of successive governments, politicians, local authorities, police and schools who have failed to address the tensions and their causes, failed appallingly over the grooming gangs, and instead of encouraging a frank and open exchange and debate, appear to appease muslim sensibilities, in doing so, have arguably exacerbated the problem.
I'd also argue that Labour and the Green party politicians have made the problem significantly worse by encouraging ethno-religious sectarianism for their own political ends.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵If @KeirStarmer truly wants to repair Britain's social fabric, he must first understand what's tearing it.
It’s not just mass immigration and the public backlash. It’s the collapse of serious government, the erosion of standards, the loss of shared British identity and the refusal of politicians to act when they should.
Here's a wave-top list of what must be done:🧵⬇️
🧵1) Immigration control must be real, not rhetorical window dressing.
Illegal immigration must be ended by removing the appeal of it. Illegal immigrants must be detained and removed. Overstayers must be removed. Foreign national offenders deported.
Legal immigration must be paused until society, services and infrastructure can catch up.
Immigrants must be required to integrate and the law must apply equally to all - no exceptions.
🧵2) Rebuild the foundations of national security
Our border regime and agencies need wholesale reform – we need a fully comprehensive and integrated national border strategy.
Police reform is required: overhaul of recruitment, selection, training and promotion, depoliticisation, ending of political reporting and constraints, reduction of administration, re-assertion of the principle of “without fear or favour”.
🧵1/6: Today’s vote in Parliament has really exercised me.
379 MPs voted to remove the right to life from healthy, full term unborn children.
They talk of choice for the mothers, but there’s no justice, compassion or humanity in legalising the killing of a perfectly viable child moments before its birth.
The British people didn’t ask for this, weren’t consulted in it, didn’t vote for and, like me, find it morally abhorrent. 🧵…
2/6: Although only 1% of the British public supports it, Parliament did it anyway. That is not democracy.
3/6: MPs who supported the vote say it’s about the right of a woman to choose without facing prosecution. But where’s the child’s right to live?
When a baby can survive outside the womb, the argument for the right to terminate it becomes an argument for murder for convenience…
1/5. I’ve had enough. I’m a culturally conservative patriot. I try to be kind and make the world better place. I appreciate and respect the environment and animals; our green an pleasant land. I’m proud of the achievements of Britain, but respect t other nations too…
2/5 …but I can’t ignore the damage to our Nation being caused by parliamentarians who lack the basic leadership traits, experience, knowledge, courage and ethos to lead our great nation. Our healthcare, education, policing, defence, welfare and social care are all suffering.
3/5 …we must rebuild these things. We must rebuild the confidence, optimism, prosperity and security of our society. We must end divisive identity politics and oppose those who undermine our own history, heritage and culture…
1/4. Albanian PM, Edi Rama @ediramaal has tweeted pointing out that when Germany had a problem with Albanians they tightened their immigration laws and that the UK should do the same. He’s right (I was adviser to a previous🇦🇱 PM and led UK ops against crime groups in the region.
2/4. I’d also question whether all those arriving on our south coast saying they’re Albanian are indeed Albanian citizens. I suspect many are Albanian (🇦🇱) citizens of Kosovo(🇽🇰). They speak Albanian but, unlike Albania itself, Kosovo doesn’t have a visa agreement with the EU…
3/4. So by lying, saying they’re Albanian citizens, Kosovars get into the EU without a visa (It shouldn’t be but is easy for Kosovars to get 🇦🇱 passports). As for Albanian organised crime it dominates Europe. Mostly it emanates from Kosovo and northern Albania (bordering Kosovo)