🚨 Flock has a hidden weakness many don’t know: public records requests.
Activists have successfully forced at least 8 cities to shut down Flock programs, either by exposing unauthorized data access or showing the footage was publicly accessible.
One of the most effective ways to take down Flock cameras? FOIA/PRA requests.
Here’s a template to file one in your city:
To the Custodian of Records:
Pursuant to the (your state here) Public Records Act (your state's public records act code.), I request access to and copies of the following public records relating to the (your local police) Police Department’s surveillance camera network reportedly consisting of more than 2,600 cameras deployed throughout the city.
Please provide records covering the period January 1, 2020 through present unless otherwise specified. 1. Policies and Legal Authority
All policies, procedures, memoranda, directives, or legal analyses governing:
-The deployment and operation of surveillance cameras within __________
-Any legal justification for the program under federal or state constitutional law
-Policies governing Fourth Amendment considerations or privacy protections
-Any City Council ordinances or resolutions authorizing the camera network
2. Contracts and Vendors
All contracts, agreements, memoranda of understanding, purchase orders, or amendments with vendors or service providers related to:
-Surveillance cameras
-Automated license plate readers
-Real-time crime centers
-Video analytics, facial recognition, or artificial intelligence
-Data storage or cloud services used for camera footage
Please include vendor proposals, RFP responses, and bid documents.
3. Camera Locations
Records identifying:
-The number and location of cameras deployed
-Maps, GIS datasets, or inventories of surveillance devices
-Any classification of cameras as public, private-partner, or third-party integrated cameras
(If precise coordinates are withheld, provide generalized location records or district-level inventories.)
4. Data Retention and Access
All records describing:
-Video retention schedules
-Policies for deletion or archiving of footage
-Which agencies or departments have access to the camera network
-Any data sharing agreements with other agencies including but not limited to:
All records relating to programs that integrate privately owned cameras into the police network, including:
-Agreements with homeowners, businesses, or HOAs
-Terms of participation
-Data access rights granted to the police department
6. Surveillance Technology Capabilities
Records describing whether the system includes or supports:
-Facial recognition
-License plate recognition
-Behavioral analytics
-Crowd detection
-Real-time monitoring centers
7. Crime Reduction Claims
All records, reports, studies, or internal analyses supporting claims that the surveillance network caused reductions in crime, including:
-Statistical reports
-Internal evaluations
-Communications discussing the effectiveness of the system
8. Communications
Emails, memoranda, and internal communications between (your city) Police Department personnel, City officials, or vendors referencing:
-Expansion of the camera network
-Privacy concerns
-Public opposition or legal review
Search terms should include: “camera network”, “surveillance cameras”, “real time crime center”, "Aerodome", "Raven", “ALPR”, “Flock”, “facial recognition”, and “camera integration”.
Format
Please provide records in electronic format via email or download link.
If any records are withheld, please provide the specific statutory exemption relied upon and produce all reasonably segregable portions of responsive documents.
Fee Waiver
This request concerns matters of significant public interest involving government surveillance and constitutional rights, and any fees should be waived or minimized.
I look forward to your response within the statutory timeframe.
🧵 In recent hacked Epstein emails from 2014, one thing is clear: Epstein was desperate to position Peter Thiel as a power broker in Israel, arranging meetings with 🇮🇱 ex‑PM Barak + top officials. The real question: What incentive drove Epstein to engineer this influence?
It wasn’t just Thiel, though he was clearly the prized catch. Hacked emails (2000s–2018) read like an A-list Silicon Valley Rolodex: Palantir’s Alex Karp, Oracle’s Larry Ellison, and Jeff Bezos. All lobbied and recruited by Israeli officials for technocratic shadow agendas.
The emails reveal a cozy triangle: billionaires, ex‑heads of state, intel agencies. String-pullers quietly laying foundations for the technocratic state long before the surveillance‑tech boom. Silicon Valley + national security + Israeli intel, colluding behind closed doors.
We all know that Peter Thiel is the Silicon Valley's GOP king maker, but who made Thiel King?
The story of man behind In-Q-Tel: Gilman Louie. 🧵
Gilman Louie didn’t start in intelligence — he made his name in video games. Flight sims, Tetris licensing, early VR. By the 90s, the Pentagon realized: those who build virtual worlds can also understand model real ones. That’s when Louie entered the national security story.
In 1999, Louie became founding CEO of In‑Q‑Tel, the CIA’s venture arm. Seeded with $30M, it funneled intel money into private tech. It backed 80+ startups, most notably Palantir, Keyhole (Google Earth), and ArcSight—laying the blueprint for U.S. surveillance infrastructure.
🧵 The U.S. just funded AI that can ID you from ½ mile away just by the way you walk.
IARPA’s BRIAR program integrates your face, body, & even your walk to track you through drones & CCTV—day or night, even in crowds.
The tech is already being tested. No public oversight.
IARPA = Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity.
BRIAR = Biometric Recognition and Identification at Altitude and Range.
Think DARPA, but for the CIA/NSA.
Its mission? To create AI, biometrics, surveillance and data fusion systems to identify anyone, anywhere.
Experts warn BRIAR could bypass city/state facial recognition bans by target civilians using “whole-body” ID. Without oversight, it threatens privacy, freedom of movement, and normalizes predatory data collection.
It provides pesticide companies, including giants like Bayer/Monsanto and Syngenta, with near-total protection from lawsuits, even when their products are later implicated in causing harm.
This is NOT making America great again!
The Chemical Industry’s Playbook: Liability Shields, Legal Immunity, and the Erosion of Rights
What would happen if a foreign country was operating a warship illegally in U.S. waters, shot down an American passenger plane, killed 290 innocent civilians, including 66 children, lied about it, covered it up and then refused to formally apologize?
Just ask Iran. 🧵
Today is the 37th anniversary of a U.S. war crime most Americans never heard of. In 1988, the U.S. shot down Iran Air Flight 655 in Iranian airspace. 290 dead. No justice, no apology. And even after recently being bombed again, Iran refuses to escalate.
They’re now building a $10B “smart city” called Woven City, sold as a futuristic utopia powered by AI, robotics and "clean energy." But, it raises urgent questions about privacy, control, and the future of freedom.
Woven City is wired with sensors to monitor everything: energy use, movement, health data. It's being built as a “living lab” where the environment is engineered to collect constant feedback on human behavior. That’s not "smart tech"...that’s surveillance.
Set to open this fall, the first phase will house about 360 Toyota employees, families, and researchers. AI will oversee homes, track movement, and mediate human interaction, all under 24/7 data collection, making it a fertile testbed for behavioral engineering.