Agentic payments will be a huge trend. But it's not here yet. I had the most bearish take in this article, and I want to explain why, because crypto has a bad habit of getting high on its own supply and giving unrealistic timelines about technology.
Take the mouse. This is what the first computer mouse looked like. Imagine seeing this thing and peering into the future--no more terminal interfaces, now GUIs would onboard billions onto personal computers.
You'd be right! But the first mouse was invented in 1964. It took many years before the mouse would be widespread and commercialized.
This is where agents are right now. OpenClaw gives you a tantalizing picture of where we're going. But if you've actually used OpenClaw, you know it's buggy, complicated, and is not smart enough to have it manage your money. It routinely ends up going bankrupt doing stupid shit.
That will change. Right now OpenClaw is using models out of the box on tasks effectively outside of the training distribution. That's why it feels so broken.
But none of the labs have RL'd against OpenClaw traces yet--and those traces are rich with signal. Once you see the first lab-released Claw-style model and harness, expect a huge jump in performance and consistency. Every lab has tons of OpenClaw data now, and they're all working on this, because they see how big the prize is.
Expect this to take some time. Right now it's just the tinkerers playing around with this stuff. x402 is only doing a ~million in volume a day (and MPP much less), which shows that right now it's just tinkerers.
But a next generation of models will likely be released within months. That will spell the end of the tinkering era and the start of early adopter phase.
But even that will be early. The early majority will take years. This is a long-term story--the early adopters, the early majority, the late majority, and then the late adopters. But agents are coming for everyone, and they will change how all money moves.
As the @cdixon mantra goes: what smart people are doing on their weekends and evenings, everyone will be doing in 10 years.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
DeFi TVL is now sitting at $42B, a 2.5 year low, below even when FTX collapsed.
The naive response is that this is bearish. But that's not necessarily true.
There are two reasons why this TVL downturn is not a big deal IMO. 👇
1. The risk-free rate has skyrocketed, so on-chain yields are now below off-chain yields. Compound is paying ~3% on USDC, while the Fed Funds rate is ~5.5%. This naturally pulls capital off-chain.
This is normal. As rates go down over the coming years, much of that will return.
2. DeFi is becoming more capital-efficient—RFQ systems, better liquidations, and Uniswap v3 have reduced capital requirements. Case in point: DEX volumes remain strong.
All of this means it's not that DeFi is dying—rather, TVL is becoming a less useful metric today.
Yesterday I freaked out about the revelation that @Ledger could spit out your private key with a firmware update.
Yet I noticed the smartest people were not freaking out. Was I missing something?
I spent the evening educating myself, and now I'm in the "nvm it's fine" camp.
This was my initial mental model: I thought Ledger's Secure Element was like Apple's Secure Enclave—a box that a private key lives in which can only sign things, but "keys can never leave the device." h/t @roinevirta
But it's not! Firmware can exfiltrate the private key! Oh god!
This take is actually nonsensical. This *can't be how it works*.
Because Ledgers *upgrade*.
Many people's instinct is "wait why even? I don't want my hardware wallet to ever upgrade."
FTX reminded us of the failures of centralization. Yes, we need regulation, but even moreso we need innovation.
Proud to announce we seeded @renegade_fi, an on-chain dark pool that uses ZKPs and MPC to build a truly anonymized decentralized exchange.
The future is trustless. 👇
1/ In the wake of FTX, traders have been wary of counterparty risk from exchanges. CeFi has entered a new low-trust phase.
With Renegade, counterparty risk is obviated via cryptography and zero-knowledge proofs. Custody is guaranteed on-chain. You don't need to trust anyone.
2/ You can also eliminate much of MEV from DeFi, as validators and sequencers only ever see ZKPs of valid transactions. No more transaction reordering or sandwich attack shenanigans.
1/ Fraud case is rock solid. Chai using Terra was a complete fabrication, with fake on-chain transactions and everything.
I was surprised by how egregious this was. People at Terraform Labs knew it was bullshit.
2/ They claim UST is a security because it was so closely tied to Anchor, which was marketed as a profitable investment. I guess I can see it? Might be a version of Gensler's money market argument—he may then go after BUSD under the theory that BUSD + Binance Earn ≈ Anchor.
Every year at @dragonfly_xyz we do a retro on the biggest lessons of the year. This year we came up with the top 10 lessons that we wanted to take away as venture investors in 2023.
I thought it might be useful to share them. Here are the 10 lessons in order: 👇
1. Diligence actually matters.
In the year of FTX, LUNA, and 3AC, this is the one lesson everyone in the industry learned.
Doesn't matter how impressive the founders seem. If you don't verify what they are telling you, you *will* eventually get burned.
2. When everything seems crazy, it probably is.
Valuations and narratives got ahead of themselves last year. We felt that something was off and late-stage valuations were not sustainable. It's tempting to brush that off and say "well, the market is smarter than me."