The CLARITY Act stablecoin yield fight looks like banks vs. crypto.
It's not.
It's a controlled negotiation over how fast to allow substitution within a system that cannot afford to have its foundations questioned too loudly.
Thread 🧵
It's not.
It's a controlled negotiation over how fast to allow substitution within a system that cannot afford to have its foundations questioned too loudly.
Thread 🧵
Coinbase wants to pay you 4-5% yield on USDC.
Your bank pays you 0.5%.
The math is obvious. The capital flight would be real.
But the banks aren't just protecting profits. They're protecting the credit creation engine that funds the entire economy.
Fractional reserve banking IS growth financing.
Your bank pays you 0.5%.
The math is obvious. The capital flight would be real.
But the banks aren't just protecting profits. They're protecting the credit creation engine that funds the entire economy.
Fractional reserve banking IS growth financing.
Here's what everyone misses:
Stablecoins are "full reserve" — every USDC is backed 1:1 by a real asset.
But that asset is US Treasuries.
And Treasuries are obligations of the same sovereign that issues the dollar the stablecoin is pegged to.
There is no escape hatch. They are the same thing.
Stablecoins are "full reserve" — every USDC is backed 1:1 by a real asset.
But that asset is US Treasuries.
And Treasuries are obligations of the same sovereign that issues the dollar the stablecoin is pegged to.
There is no escape hatch. They are the same thing.
The recursive loop:
↳ USDC pegged to USD
↳ USDC backed by Treasuries
↳ Treasuries are US govt debt
↳ USD is a Fed liability
↳ The Fed IS the US govt
A USD stablecoin cannot decorrelate from USD sovereign risk.
It's not a safer dollar. It's a more transparent dollar.
Different thing entirely.
↳ USDC pegged to USD
↳ USDC backed by Treasuries
↳ Treasuries are US govt debt
↳ USD is a Fed liability
↳ The Fed IS the US govt
A USD stablecoin cannot decorrelate from USD sovereign risk.
It's not a safer dollar. It's a more transparent dollar.
Different thing entirely.
The unintended consequence nobody talks about:
At scale, stablecoins are a machine that channels private savings directly into US sovereign debt financing.
Circle + Tether already hold hundreds of billions in T-bills.
Maybe Washington's enthusiasm for stablecoins isn't about fintech.
Maybe it's about finding buyers for $2T annual deficits.
At scale, stablecoins are a machine that channels private savings directly into US sovereign debt financing.
Circle + Tether already hold hundreds of billions in T-bills.
Maybe Washington's enthusiasm for stablecoins isn't about fintech.
Maybe it's about finding buyers for $2T annual deficits.
If deposit flight happens too fast — credit contraction, regional bank failures, recession.
A weaker sovereign means weaker Treasuries.
Weaker Treasuries means the stablecoins eating the banks start to wobble.
The thing consuming the system destroys itself in the process.
The yield fight is a speed governor. Not an on/off switch.
A weaker sovereign means weaker Treasuries.
Weaker Treasuries means the stablecoins eating the banks start to wobble.
The thing consuming the system destroys itself in the process.
The yield fight is a speed governor. Not an on/off switch.
Every instrument — bank deposits, stablecoins, money markets, T-bills — is a different wrapper on the same bet:
That the US stays solvent and the dollar stays reserve currency.
Stablecoins didn't create an alternative. They made the bet more legible.
Bitcoin is the only instrument not making that bet.
Buy Bitcoin!
That the US stays solvent and the dollar stays reserve currency.
Stablecoins didn't create an alternative. They made the bet more legible.
Bitcoin is the only instrument not making that bet.
Buy Bitcoin!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
