Ari Peskoe Profile picture
Mar 30 5 tweets 1 min read Read on X
Entergy should release detailed accounting records -- which are standard in utility rate cases -- if it wants to claim $2B in ratepayer savings.

Entergy stock is up 7% since it announced the deal.
The White House's Ratepayer Protection Pledge is an empty promise unless there is transparency and accountability. If the Pledge is backed only by company press releases, then it's just "PR help" for the hyperscalers, as the President let slip.
But it's not too late for the Pledge to be meaningful.

The previous Meta-Entergy deal is not public. From what we know, ratepayers are paying fo $500M in transmission upgrades. Key benefit is that ratepayers might get a good deal on a used natural gas plant in 2042.
Friday's press release about the deal claims $2B "ratepayer savings" bc of Meta facilities. For further info on the savings, Entergy links to the company's prior press release describing its own 'pledge' about data centers.

Press releases all the way down.
Someone should do something!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ari Peskoe

Ari Peskoe Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AriPeskoe

Mar 13
PJM has no authority over transmission line ratings. This is a governance and regulatory failure.

PJM is now technically able to use more accurate inputs in its transmission system models, but it might not actually be doing so. It's up to the utilities.
Inaccurate line undervalue transmission capabilities, creating inflexible constraints in system models that cause higher energy prices, stifle new entry, and divert planning processes away from beneficial projects.
As the market monitor puts it, "PJM prices are extremely sensitive to transmission line ratings." Image
Read 6 tweets
Mar 4
In case you're not watching today's press conference on the "ratepayer protection pledge," the President said this is why they've convened today:
President makes FERC Commissioners stand and says FERC Commissioners "are the most powerful people in the country . . . I've had more people say, do you know FERC? I've learned so much about FERC."
Mike Johnson is here and speaking for some reason. Calls the "pledge . . . an idea whose time has come." It responds to "misinformation."
Read 7 tweets
Mar 4
Looks like the "ratepayer protection" press conference is about to start --
While we're waiting, here's FDR's 1932 speech about utility regulation -- presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/camp…
oh no. there are people with hardhats sitting in the back. he's going to say coal is the solution, isn't he?
Read 19 tweets
Jan 22
Rehearing requests about Colocation in PJM are coming in.

The utilities broadly oppose FERC's order that PJM offer new tiers of transmission service. Mostly, they argue FERC has not shown that existing rates are unjust and unreasonable or that the new service tiers will be J&R.
They also argue that the new service tiers are unduly discriminatory and "in tension" w Open Access transmission principles. And they argue FERC is infringing on state authority over retail service.
But there's a utility schism! Exelon and FirstEnergy sign on to these arguments. AEP, PSE&G, PPL, Duke, Dominion, Duquesne, ConEd, (others I'm forgetting) are not on this filing.

Pretty unusual to see a TO disagreement on such significant issues.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 22
No. This map of retail electricity prices reflects generational trends. Of course, state + fed policies have price impacts. But stating that state clean energy policies are "why Blue States have the highest electricity prices" is wrong.

Some history in this short thread --
Here's a chart and map from the Federal Power Commission's 1964 National Power Survey, showing 1962 prices. Note higher prices in the Northeast and California. Not a perfect reflection of today but the NE trend has been persistent since at least 1962! Image
Image
Here's a map I just made of 1990 retail prices from EIA data.
Light colors show less than 10% difference from US avg.
Dark colors show greater than 20% difference.
Medium colors are between 10 and 20 % Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 21
More action in PJM.
1. Last week, the utilities asked FERC for an extension in proposing how to comply with FERC's December order on co-location. Today, Constellation protests: the utilities "have long benefited by delaying existing large load co-location requests."
Why did the utilities ask for an extension and not PJM? Because FERC has ordered new rates for new tiers of transmission service and the utilities want to control what happens next.
Ordinarily, the utilities have the "right" to propose new rates (but not terms of service). But in this proceeding, where FERC found PJM's tariff is unjust and unreasonable, the utilities have no "rights" to control the process.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(