"@Amazon's controversial Prime-priority system loophole is being exposed more & more. By blaming your bank, they shift the fault to a 3rd party, when in reality, the delay is happening internally within their own warehouse queue. Here's why that 'Processing Gap' works for them."
"Invisible Queue: Amazon’s algorithm treats Prime orders as high-priority & non-Prime orders as background tasks. Your items may be on a shelf 5ft away from a packer, but the system won't generate a pick ticket for your order until X time passes or a Prime-heavy rush subsides."
"Authorization Trap: When you click buy, Amazon sent a pinger to your bank to see if $ there. Your bank said Yes & set it aside. Because Amazon doesn't officially take the $ until the box is taped shut, they claim the $ is pending indefinitely while they ignore the order."
"Nudge Strategy: The delay is a psyop. By making the guest experience feel broken or unreliable, they hope you’ll eventually give in & click the Get it faster w/ Prime button out of desperation to get your items. This generates more $ for Amazon via more Prime memberships."
"Evidence of Intentional Friction: An FTC settlement specifically targeted these types of manipulative design elements. Regulators found Amazon purposefully designed the non-Prime experience to be cumbersome & slower than technically necessary to drive subscription revenue."
"Your $: Since your bank is holding the funds, that $ is currently unavailable to you even though Amazon hasn't taken it yet. If you cancel the order, it can sometimes take 3-7 days for your bank to release the hold, which is why customers feel trapped into just waiting it out."
@ThreadReaderApp: Unroll, please. Thank you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
HOW TONE-DEAF IS THE MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RAISING PARK FEES FOR ALL IN THE FACE OF TRUMP ADMIN AMERICA 1ST FEES FOR U.S. CITIZENS AT NATIONAL PARKS—RAISING FEES FOR FOREIGNERS?
— County Cost Analysis Based Upon Biden Economy As Trump Admin Turns It Around —
1 OF THE MULTIPLE ENEMIES OF REAL AMERICAN ELECTION INTEGRITY: THE AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR ELECTION TECHNOLOGY
Natl nonpartisan trade assoc established to advance policies & programs supporting use of election technology to ensure secure accurate accessible & transparent elections.
2/4 AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR ELECTION TECHNOLOGY
Hover over "ABOUT US," & "POLITICAL NEUTRALITY" pops up.
What this really means is that the American Council for Election Technology (ACET) is an equal-opportunity Black Box Voting Machine & Black Box Elections Platform promoter.
3/4 AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR ELECTION TECHNOLOGY (ACET)
The Executive Director at the American Council for Election Technology (ACET) is Sara Cutter.
"1) THE SCHOOL REQUESTED AN SRO (COST COVERED BY STATE GOVT), 2) THE TEACHERS REQUESTED AN SRO, 3) THE PARENTS REQUESTED AN SRO, & 4) THE ADMIN CHOSEN BY THE SCHOOL BOARD REQUESTED AN SRO—BUT A SICKENING MAJORITY OF THE SCHOOL BOARD REJECTED IT."
ASK THE REST HOW THEY VOTED, WHEN THEY'RE GOING TO VOTE AGAIN, & HOW THEY'RE GOING TO VOTE: Ceyshe Napa (President), Signa Oliver, Aaron Marquez, Francisco Pastor-Rivera, Debbie Cross & Lizette Mier
"1) THE SCHOOL REQUESTED AN SRO (COST COVERED BY STATE GOVT), 2) THE TEACHERS REQUESTED AN SRO, 3) THE PARENTS REQUESTED AN SRO, & 4) THE ADMIN CHOSEN BY THE SCHOOL BOARD REQUESTED AN SRO—BUT A SICKENING MAJORITY OF THE SCHOOL BOARD REJECTED IT"
"The Court ENJOINS the Government from the following actions against Plaintiffs: Interpreting or enforcing 39 C.F.R. § 232.1(1) to prohibit Plaintiffs' (& their members) possession & carrying of firearms inside of an ordinary U.S. Post Office or surrounding Post Office property."
"Second Amendement Foundation @SAF joined in case—FPC v Bondi—by Firearms Policy Coalition @GunPolicy & two private citizens (TX)."
1st Up: Plaintiffs w/ Standing + Org Membership | Next Up: Expansion to #WeThePeople throughout the United States. Thanks!
2) In a 6-1 "decision," the U.S. Supreme Court #SCOTUS ruled the following school prayer unconstitutional:
"Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and we beg Thy blessings upon us, our parents, our teachers and our country. Amen."
3) Lower courts upheld the prayer so long as students were never forced to participate or compelled to recite the prayer over parental objections. In SCOTUS Justice Potter Stewart's dissent, he wrote: