1/X ON "ELECTION PURIFICATION": ELECTIONS EVER LEAVE A "BAD TASTE" IN YOUR MOUTH?
—Comparing Black Box Machine Elections to Water Purification—
Research project takes a turn, so sharing with the general public—to evaluate on its own, & follow up with any concerns or questions.
2/X via Google AI*: "The comparison to 'black box' technology is a common concern when high-stakes systems—elections or water treatment—rely on complex machinery."
(*Subject to confirmations & revisions.)
3/X "However, water purification is designed with 'open-source' accountability through physical laws, independent oversight, & public data that distinguish it from a closed software system."
4/X "1. Verification vs. Obfuscation: While some technologies hide their 'logic' in proprietary code, water treatment relies on physics and chemistry that can be independently verified."
5/X "Physical Barriers: A 'black box' software might have a hidden bug, but a Reverse Osmosis membrane is a physical mesh. If the membrane were compromised, the 'black box' would immediately show a drop in water pressure or an increase in mineral content (salinity)..."
6/X "which is measured by hardware sensors, not just software.
Independent Labs: Each year, a city conducts 5M+ tests & measurements. These samples are analyzed by third-party, state-certified labs that have no financial stake in the city's 'proprietary' technology." (0 stake?)
7/X "2. Public Oversight & Records: Unlike many private technology platforms, the City of Phoenix & the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) are legally bound by public record laws."
8/X "Regulatory Audits: The ADEQ requires all water systems to submit data through the Compliance Monitoring Data Portal (CMDP). This creates a permanent, auditable paper trail of every contaminant detected."
9/X "Public Access: You can search the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) to see every violation, test result, and contact for your specific water provider."
10/X "3. Multiple Human 'Checkpoints': Trust is built through a 'multi-barrier' approach requiring human intervention & professional certification.
Licensed Operators: Every plant is run by certified professionals personally & legally responsible for the water’s safety."
11/X "Stakeholder Scrutiny: Groups like the Technical Advisory Group (TAG)—which includes university researchers, health experts, & community members—publicly review & recommend the rules for these systems before they are even built."
12/X "4. Real-World Traceability: If you suspect the "black box" is failing, you don't have to trust the city's dashboard. Any resident can take a sample of their tap water & send it to a private lab."
13/X "The technology is 'testable' at the point of use, providing a level of end-user verification that software platforms rarely allow."
14/X "The City of Phoenix Water Quality Reports are published every May, allowing you to see the actual data for yourself & compare it against federal standards."
15/X "Testing Services & Estimated Costs: For the most accurate verification of wastewater-to-potable purification, you should request a Comprehensive Lab Panel rather than a basic home kit."
16/X "Comprehensive Lab Panels: Typically cost between $250 and $500 & cover metals, minerals, VOCs, & all regulated contaminants.
Specialized Bacterial Testing: Targeting pathogens like E. coli or coliform bacteria usually starts around $25 to $50 per test."
17/X "Lead & Nitrate Testing: These specific tests generally range from $30 to $100 depending on the lab.
Mail-In Services: Companies like Tap Score provide pre-paid kits that use these same certified labs for independent verification."
Parting Shot: What About Our Skies?
@ThreadReaderApp: Unroll, please. Thank you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"@Amazon's controversial Prime-priority system loophole is being exposed more & more. By blaming your bank, they shift the fault to a 3rd party, when in reality, the delay is happening internally within their own warehouse queue. Here's why that 'Processing Gap' works for them."
"Invisible Queue: Amazon’s algorithm treats Prime orders as high-priority & non-Prime orders as background tasks. Your items may be on a shelf 5ft away from a packer, but the system won't generate a pick ticket for your order until X time passes or a Prime-heavy rush subsides."
"Authorization Trap: When you click buy, Amazon sent a pinger to your bank to see if $ there. Your bank said Yes & set it aside. Because Amazon doesn't officially take the $ until the box is taped shut, they claim the $ is pending indefinitely while they ignore the order."
HOW TONE-DEAF IS THE MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RAISING PARK FEES FOR ALL IN THE FACE OF TRUMP ADMIN AMERICA 1ST FEES FOR U.S. CITIZENS AT NATIONAL PARKS—RAISING FEES FOR FOREIGNERS?
— County Cost Analysis Based Upon Biden Economy As Trump Admin Turns It Around —
1 OF THE MULTIPLE ENEMIES OF REAL AMERICAN ELECTION INTEGRITY: THE AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR ELECTION TECHNOLOGY
Natl nonpartisan trade assoc established to advance policies & programs supporting use of election technology to ensure secure accurate accessible & transparent elections.
2/4 AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR ELECTION TECHNOLOGY
Hover over "ABOUT US," & "POLITICAL NEUTRALITY" pops up.
What this really means is that the American Council for Election Technology (ACET) is an equal-opportunity Black Box Voting Machine & Black Box Elections Platform promoter.
3/4 AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR ELECTION TECHNOLOGY (ACET)
The Executive Director at the American Council for Election Technology (ACET) is Sara Cutter.
"1) THE SCHOOL REQUESTED AN SRO (COST COVERED BY STATE GOVT), 2) THE TEACHERS REQUESTED AN SRO, 3) THE PARENTS REQUESTED AN SRO, & 4) THE ADMIN CHOSEN BY THE SCHOOL BOARD REQUESTED AN SRO—BUT A SICKENING MAJORITY OF THE SCHOOL BOARD REJECTED IT."
ASK THE REST HOW THEY VOTED, WHEN THEY'RE GOING TO VOTE AGAIN, & HOW THEY'RE GOING TO VOTE: Ceyshe Napa (President), Signa Oliver, Aaron Marquez, Francisco Pastor-Rivera, Debbie Cross & Lizette Mier
"1) THE SCHOOL REQUESTED AN SRO (COST COVERED BY STATE GOVT), 2) THE TEACHERS REQUESTED AN SRO, 3) THE PARENTS REQUESTED AN SRO, & 4) THE ADMIN CHOSEN BY THE SCHOOL BOARD REQUESTED AN SRO—BUT A SICKENING MAJORITY OF THE SCHOOL BOARD REJECTED IT"
"The Court ENJOINS the Government from the following actions against Plaintiffs: Interpreting or enforcing 39 C.F.R. § 232.1(1) to prohibit Plaintiffs' (& their members) possession & carrying of firearms inside of an ordinary U.S. Post Office or surrounding Post Office property."
"Second Amendement Foundation @SAF joined in case—FPC v Bondi—by Firearms Policy Coalition @GunPolicy & two private citizens (TX)."
1st Up: Plaintiffs w/ Standing + Org Membership | Next Up: Expansion to #WeThePeople throughout the United States. Thanks!