Бианка Profile picture
Apr 19 6 tweets 2 min read Read on X
A THREAD ON THE "BULGARIAN ORBAN" 🧵
Folks, Radev won't be the new Orban, please, read past the clickbait headlines! Here's why:

1) The math isn't mathing - he won't get a supermajority, he needs coalition partners.
👇
2) Bulgaria's external constraints are harder than Hungary's were when Orban took over. Bulgaria joined the eurozone this January, it is in Schengen, NATO, and depends massively on EU cohesion funds. Radev has said he would not use Sofia's veto power to block EU decisions. No one runs from where the money is, and it ain't in Moscow.
3) Radev is a party machine of ONE: his political project has no institutional depth. He's at the peak of his personal brand with zero machine underneath him. Bulgarian political history is littered with exactly this pattern: NDSV (42.7% in 2001 → gone), GERB as a personal vehicle that peaked and now survives on inertia, ITN (first political force in July 2021, ~1% now). Personalist projects in Bulgaria have a half-life of one to two electoral cycles.
4) Hungary 2010 vs Bulgaria 2026 are in opposite geopolitical moments.

In 2010, the EU was weak, absorbed by the eurozone crisis, with no tools to discipline a member state drifting authoritarian. The rule-of-law conditionality mechanism, Article 7, the frozen funds toolkit - none of it existed or was operational. Brussels basically watched Orban consolidate for a decade before doing anything.

By 2026, all of those tools exist and have been used. Hungary has billions in frozen EU funds. The "Orbán model" is empirically in decline at the exact moment someone is being accused of imitating it.
5) RUSSIA IS BROKE

Orban's pro-Russia tilt worked partly because Moscow could actually offer him juice. In 2026, Russia is draining its sovereign wealth fund to keep the war going, its gold reserves are being tapped, and it has nothing to hand out anymore. Being a Moscow-friendly leader in 2026 gets you rhetoric and domestic propaganda benefits, but not the material goodies that let Orbán deliver to his base. Radev can posture; he can't be paid. So any pro-Russian talk would be for domestic consumption only, it will not impact the EU.
Bottom line: expect a bumpy, coalition-dependent prime minister or the man behind one, running a government (assuming one is formed) that will rhetorically flirt with "balance" and "neutrality," pick domestic fights with pro-European parties, while keep cashing EU cheques.

Annoying, corrosive, bad for the anti-corruption agenda in the country - but structurally incapable of becoming a Bulgarian Orbán, because the majority, the institutional runway, the party machine, the external constraints, and the patron state are all wrong.

I get it that the lazy "new Orbán" headline sells clicks, but "journalists" and "analysts" should do better.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Бианка

Бианка Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BiankaB12

Jan 7
THE TYRANNY OF THE ARCTIC

So, Greenland is back in the news.
I’ve been wondering why there hasn’t been some large scale industrial development over there, given that the geological map shows reserves for a lot of critical minerals.

Then I did what I always do - started digging, and I educated myself on just how freaking hard it is to mine for resources in Greenland (and the Arctic in general). 🧵👇Image
Infrastructure deficit.

The single biggest cost driver in Greenland is the lack of basic infrastructure. In most mining jurisdictions (like Australia or Canada), a mine can often connect to an existing power grid or road. That’s not the case with Greenland.

80% ice, no roads connecting towns in Greenland, every settlement is effectively an island.

There is no national power grid to plug into either, which means mines must build their own power plants, adding hundreds of millions of dollars to upfront capital expenditure.

Also, since mines are to be located located in remote wilderness, companies must construct full-service towns for their workers - housing, sanitation, you name it.
Extreme environment

The Arctic environment imposes strict limits on when and how work can be done, drastically increasing costs.

For starters, you can only work 3-4 months max before the darkness and extreme cold halt operations (or make them very expensive).

Shipping lanes are often frozen or clogged with icebergs for large parts of the year too.

And building heavy industrial processing plants on permafrost requires expensive, specialized engineering.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 3
🧵Venezuela is NOT about cartels, it’s about China (and Russia).

This is about geopolitics.
In recent decades, Venezuela has become a vassal state of China.

To understand why Venezuela matters now, you need to understand why it collapsed in the first place. 👇
Venezuela used to be the most stable democracy in Latin America. Center-left. Pro-US. Oil nationalized, yes - but professionally run. It worked, until it didn’t.

The collapse was caused by a lethal combination of oil dependency + institutional rot + unchecked populism.
When oil prices were high (starting with the Yon Kippur war), the government spent everything. There was no Norwegian model in Venezuela

No savings. No one investments. No diversification. Therefore, when prices fell upon discovery of oil in the North Sea, the system imploded.
Read 9 tweets
Dec 6, 2025
WARNING: LONG THREAD 🧵
Dear Americans,
Your political and media class has sold you a very convenient fairy tale for decades - the tale of how your tax dollars pay to defend freeloading Europe.

While it's an emotionally satisfying narrative, it's also wrong.

THE U.S. DOES NOT SUBSIDIZE EUROPEAN DEFENCE.

You are not running a charity, you are running an empire. And empires are costly.

Your forward deployments, your bases, your carrier groups, etc. - they are the pillars of a global security architecture that mainly serves you: to protect your trade routes, your currency, your corporate supply chains, your ability to project force anywhere on the planet in hours and days, not months.

Let’s walk through this like adults, and not emotional toddlers, shall we?
1. Power projection, not philanthropy

Your prosperity rests on your ability to project power -military, financial, informational.

Your ports are not overflowing with cheap goods and energy because the world thinks you’re cute or because U.S. Treasuries are sacred. You sit at the center of the system because you guarantee that system with force: sea lanes, chokepoints, sanctions, no-fly zones when it suits you.

No one forced the U.S. into that role. Washington chose it because the benefits - geopolitical leverage, economic primacy, dollar hegemony - are enormous. Stop pretending it’s some unreciprocated act of kindness toward Europe.
2. Europe is your global hub

Open a map. Then look at where your stuff is.

Europe is the logistical backbone that lets you wage war and conduct operations across Africa, the Middle East, and parts of Asia without having to move everything across the ocean every time.

Ramstein and the rest of the European network are not there to “protect Germany’” They are there because from European soil you can:

- Fly troops and cargo to Iraq, Syria, the Gulf, the Sahel, Afghanistan and back with minimal time loss.

- Run command-and-control, ISR, and drone operations into multiple theatres.

- Treat wounded and rotate forces efficiently because the entire infrastructure is already in place.

You could try to rebuild that from scratch inside CONUS or in less stable regions. It would cost you billions, take years, and give you worse geography. Forward basing in allied countries is, in many analyses, cheaper than constantly rotating equivalent forces from the U.S. and trying to replicate those hubs at home.

So no, you’re not “paying to defend Europe.” You’re paying for real estate that underwrites your global reach.
Read 8 tweets
Dec 5, 2025
Unfortunately, the Europeans are retarded enough to bury our beloved contient by selling out to China.

China is an absolute cancer to our free way of life. Many Chinese see themselves as superior to Europeans - in race, intellect, culture, everything. And that’s how they’ll treat us (some in positions of power in the private sector - already are).

Also, China has invested decades and billions of yuans in dismantling European industry and unity 👇
🏭 Weaponized Overcapacity

State-backed subsidies fuel artificial surpluses (solar, steel, and now EVs). These are dumped on the EU market at unmatchable prices, driving solvent European firms into bankruptcy. While we operate on the premise of free-market economies, the Chinese state capitalism actively directs capital to strategic industries, creating an uneven playing field.
📉 Asymmetric Warfare
European markets remain open, while China restricts access via "negative lists" and has historically forced EU companies to hand over proprietary tech to enter their market via JVs.
Read 7 tweets
Oct 9, 2025
🧵 THREAD SUPPLY CHAINS > MISSILES: China flipping the global tech & military balance

1/ 🚨 Big escalation. China’s Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) is rolling out sweeping export controls on rare earths, processing tech, magnets, recycling, and associated know-how - with military & AI implications baked in. 👇Image
2/ Starting December 1, any export (or re-export) of technology, equipment, or data relating to rare earth mining, smelting, magnet manufacturing, or recycling must get a Chinese government license. No exceptions.
3/‼️Even foreign products made outside China are hit: if Chinese-origin rare earth content ≥ 0.1% of the value, or if Chinese processing/tech was used somewhere in the chain, the exporter must obtain a Chinese license. This is extraterritorial reach.
Read 12 tweets
Oct 6, 2025
Thread 🧵: How Angela Merkel and the EPP propped up Boyko Borisov 👇
Let’s get one thing clear: I. Hate. Angela. Merkel. The usual crimes aside (albeit, they are enough to put her in jail), she is the one that entrenched Boyko Borisov back on 2014, during the height of our anti-corruption protests.Image
In 2013–2014, Bulgarians were on the streets protesting against corruption, oligarchy, and the rotten political system. I was there too. Every day for over a year. The protests were targeted at Borisov and Delayn Peevsky - the 2 most ruthless and disgusting thug oligarchs.

We topped the government,
demanded change, had a rising reformist party on the rise.

And what did Angela Merkel do? She handed Boyko Borisov political oxygen and saved his corrupt ass.Image
GERB was Merkel’s loyal puppy inside the European People’s Party.
She didn’t care about corruption or that Bulgaria would be captured by the mafia. She cared about votes in Brussels.

Borisov gave her numbers during a time when the Poles were not compliant with her stupid policies. In exchange - she gave him legitimacy.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(