Heidi Beirich was in charge of the SPLC’s Hate Map.
In this podcast, she ties the spike in attacks after the Trump’s 2016 election directly to him, saying he “gave license,” “made it mainstream,” like his rhetoric pushed people over the line.
She said it wouldn’t really matter if he came out and forcefully condemned it.
In her view, people hear what they want anyway, so once that language is out there, the effect sticks.
But look at how she and the SPLC talked about BLM.
They were explicit that Black Lives Matter wasn’t a hate group and said there wasn’t real evidence its activists were driven by hateful or supremacist motives.
Even with riots and violence, they said BLM was a legitimate movement with some individuals going too far.
The only people who really cashed in on the “Hate Map” were Democrats.
It was a perfect tool for them to keep the specter of hate alive.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵 @DataRepublican pointed out that DC’s public school social studies standards were revised to fit a far left progressive ideology, so I looked into who actually pushed the rewrite and who helped build it.
This is how DC used the standards process to funnel that ideology into public school classrooms.
They decided where it was going, put the right people in place, dressed it up as official guidance, and then baked it into the standards.
Here’s who was behind it and how they pulled it off. 👇
The Board Sets the Direction
In 2019, the board did not ask for a neutral cleanup of old standards.
It called for revised standards that would be 'culturally inclusive and anti-racist,' strengthen democratic principles and values, and promote civic engagement.
This is the bridge: they say the old standards are overdue, but the real question becomes who they brought in to rewrite them this time.
Ruth Wattenberg / AFT / Randi Weingarten
That board world matters.
Ruth Wattenberg's official board biography says she worked for years at the American Federation of Teachers as director of AFT's educational issues department and editor of American Educator.
I found a late 1980s source from the U.S. Institute of Peace showing Ruth Wattenberg was already plugged into a national civic education project backed by the American Federation of Teachers, Columbia’s Educational Excellence Network, and Freedom House.
🧵 If people want to know how radicalization takes root inside activist groups in the United States, start here.
A few days ago, activists in New York were mourning Iran’s supreme leader while chanting “Death to America” and calling for dead American soldiers.
I dug into the groups behind it, and what I found was more disturbing than the protest itself: the same network had already handed a microphone to rhetoric glorifying martyrdom, violent confrontation, and Americans being beaten or killed on camera for the cause.
And the next part is what should alarm people most, because the guest did not hint at it. He said it outright.
In their April 2025 panel, the guest was Laith Marouf — a Beirut-based former Canadian government anti-racism consultant whose past remarks were condemned by Canada’s government, which later terminated the related funding arrangement.
He then used the platform to argue that protest was useless without escalation.
His exact line was “only direct action is gonna change the realities.” He called it “ideal” to force “the American state to start killing its own citizens,” and described people being “beaten to death in front of the cameras of the world.”
What is sickening is that the panel, the groups that participated in the protest in NYC, agreed.
What kind of activist groups thought this belonged on their panel?
One of the clearest windows into this network is Bronx Anti-War Coalition.
The project record describes BAWC as backing resistance “by any means necessary, including armed struggle,” aligning itself with the Axis of Resistance, and operating as one of the more militant local factions in this scene, openly celebrating “martyrs” and armed resistance.
That is what makes the Marouf panel so revealing.
He was not dropped into a neutral anti-war space.
He was speaking to activists whose own politics were already moving in that direction.
🚨 A Minnesota political donor pipeline intersects with a Maine nonprofit under a MaineCare fraud probe, embedded in the state’s official “New Americans” infrastructure linked to Governor Janet Mills.
This isn’t a conspiracy. It’s all public record.
Thread 🧵👇
It starts with Maine Gov. Janet Mills.
Mills launched the Office of New Americans alongside lawmakers, including Rep. Deqa Dhalac.
Rep. Deqa Dhalac worked with Gov. Janet Mills on legislation creating Maine’s Office of New Americans.
After that framework was established, Gateway Community Services Maine, listed by the state as part of that ecosystem, was awarded $500,000 in public funding through Maine CDC / DHHS programs.
Then, in December 2025, Maine DHHS suspended MaineCare payments to Gateway over suspected fraud.
‼️ Why would a Minnesota state House candidate be financially connected to a Maine nonprofit now facing a $1 million MaineCare fraud investigation and named in a congressional request for Treasury Suspicious Activity Reports?
That question now surrounds Abdi Daisane, the owner of Blooming Kids Child Care Center, whose business has recently been cited for more than 80 licensing violations. At the same time, his campaign finance filings reveal donor ties that reach far beyond Minnesota.
That alone raises concerns. But this isn’t just a story about local compliance failures or routine campaign fundraising.
When you follow the donor network, the picture stops looking local and starts pointing toward something much larger, more coordinated, and worth serious scrutiny.
I pulled Daisane’s donor list and I found a cluster that doesn’t make sense unless there’s coordination.
A group of Maine donors show up in his Minnesota filings, several at or near the max.
And the employer line is the tell: Gateway Community Services (Portland, Maine).
Straight from the report: multiple Portland-area donors list Gateway (or adjacent language access work) and hit the $1,000 level. That is not “random support.” That is a pipeline.
Now here’s why Gateway is not just “some nonprofit.”
On Dec. 23, 2025, Bangor Daily News reported Maine DHHS halted MaineCare payments to Gateway while investigating “credible allegations of fraud,” after reviewing claims and seeking to recoup nearly
$1 million.
Maine Public reported the same escalation and described a DHHS audit finding overbilling exceeding $1 million.
And yes, federal eyes are on the orbit. Bangor Daily News reported Homeland Security Investigations agents visited sites in Lewiston, including Gateway’s office, as part of what HSI described as business audits.
So read that again: a Minnesota candidate’s donor cluster runs into a Maine entity under a fraud probe and federal auditing pressure.