Project Salt Box is the activist research group behind the tracker of ICE detention sites.
They comb through government spending records, land records, property data, warehouse ownership, contracts, local intelligence and anything else that shows who is selling property to ICE .
Then ICEbox lays it all out so activists know who owns the building, who signed the paperwork, who the contractors are, and who they need to go after.
This is economic warfare against anyone willing to do business with ICE.
Who Actually Runs Project Salt Box?
Project Salt Box is run by Michael Wriston and Breyona Gurosko, who co-founded the Baltimore activist group in late 2025.
They claim to be a “seven-person volunteer group” tracking immigration detention spending.
Michael Wriston, an Air Force veteran, serves as the public face with regular MSNBC appearances.
Breyona Gurosko handles partnerships, including their April 2026 alliance with anti-authoritarian group DEFIANCE .org.
Em Knepp writes their Substack posts.
Despite demanding government transparency, Salt Box discloses nothing about its own funding, has no identifiable nonprofit status, and provides no financial reporting.
For “volunteers,” they maintain professional infrastructure: polished media presence, nationwide coordination, and established advocacy partnerships.
Who’s actually funding this operation? They won’t say.
The Strategy: Make Lawful Business Too Costly
The approach is simple: make doing legal business with the government too expensive to sustain.
Their own guidance lays it out: target warehouse owners, contractors, and local businesses with the threat of constant protests, negative press, and reputational harm in their own communities.
It’s a coordinated pressure campaign designed to raise the social and financial costs of lawful contracts.
The playbook also calls for organizing petitions and community letters directed at property owners, aiming to generate enough backlash that they walk away from potential deals.
And it’s working, several communities have already succeeded in pushing property owners to abandon agreements with federal agencies.
When the Threat Is the Weapon
Boycotting private citizens out of doing legal business with their own government is not “activism.”
Project Salt Box is not just watching DHS.
This is a pressure campaign designed to terrorize private businesses out of signing lawful contracts with the federal government.
The message is simple: do business with ICE, and we’ll come for your livelihood.
Project Salt Box reported that at least 12 ICE warehouse contracts were killed because of their tracker.
From Activist Database to Federal Legislation: The Rashida Tlaib-Project Salt Box Pipeline
On April 22, 2026, Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib introduced the “Ban Warehouse Detention Act” to prohibit ICE from converting warehouses into detention facilities.
The same day, Project Salt Box announced its partnership with anti-authoritarian group DEFIANCE org to launch GTFOICE. org.
Tlaib’s bill is not serious legislation. It is cover for the campaign Project Salt Box is already running.
She knows the bill is going nowhere in a Republican House.
But a dead bill can still do damage.
It gives the press something official sounding to run with.
It gives property owners and businesses a reason to back out.
It lets activists keep saying Congress is “looking into it” while they keep squeezing private businesses behind the scenes.
They do not need the bill to pass. They just need enough headlines, enough pressure, and enough fear around anyone who even thinks about doing business with ICE.
If activist groups can use coordinated economic pressure to scare private businesses out of lawful federal contracts, then they are not just protesting policy anymore.
They are creating a private veto system over government functions they do not like.
Today it is ICE detention facilities. Tomorrow it could be any federal contract that becomes politically toxic enough for activists to target.
The issue is not whether people can protest.
Of course they can.
The issue is whether businesses should be financially threatened, smeared, and punished for doing legal work with the federal government.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵 @DataRepublican pointed out that DC’s public school social studies standards were revised to fit a far left progressive ideology, so I looked into who actually pushed the rewrite and who helped build it.
This is how DC used the standards process to funnel that ideology into public school classrooms.
They decided where it was going, put the right people in place, dressed it up as official guidance, and then baked it into the standards.
Here’s who was behind it and how they pulled it off. 👇
The Board Sets the Direction
In 2019, the board did not ask for a neutral cleanup of old standards.
It called for revised standards that would be 'culturally inclusive and anti-racist,' strengthen democratic principles and values, and promote civic engagement.
This is the bridge: they say the old standards are overdue, but the real question becomes who they brought in to rewrite them this time.
Ruth Wattenberg / AFT / Randi Weingarten
That board world matters.
Ruth Wattenberg's official board biography says she worked for years at the American Federation of Teachers as director of AFT's educational issues department and editor of American Educator.
I found a late 1980s source from the U.S. Institute of Peace showing Ruth Wattenberg was already plugged into a national civic education project backed by the American Federation of Teachers, Columbia’s Educational Excellence Network, and Freedom House.
🧵 If people want to know how radicalization takes root inside activist groups in the United States, start here.
A few days ago, activists in New York were mourning Iran’s supreme leader while chanting “Death to America” and calling for dead American soldiers.
I dug into the groups behind it, and what I found was more disturbing than the protest itself: the same network had already handed a microphone to rhetoric glorifying martyrdom, violent confrontation, and Americans being beaten or killed on camera for the cause.
And the next part is what should alarm people most, because the guest did not hint at it. He said it outright.
In their April 2025 panel, the guest was Laith Marouf — a Beirut-based former Canadian government anti-racism consultant whose past remarks were condemned by Canada’s government, which later terminated the related funding arrangement.
He then used the platform to argue that protest was useless without escalation.
His exact line was “only direct action is gonna change the realities.” He called it “ideal” to force “the American state to start killing its own citizens,” and described people being “beaten to death in front of the cameras of the world.”
What is sickening is that the panel, the groups that participated in the protest in NYC, agreed.
What kind of activist groups thought this belonged on their panel?
One of the clearest windows into this network is Bronx Anti-War Coalition.
The project record describes BAWC as backing resistance “by any means necessary, including armed struggle,” aligning itself with the Axis of Resistance, and operating as one of the more militant local factions in this scene, openly celebrating “martyrs” and armed resistance.
That is what makes the Marouf panel so revealing.
He was not dropped into a neutral anti-war space.
He was speaking to activists whose own politics were already moving in that direction.
🚨 A Minnesota political donor pipeline intersects with a Maine nonprofit under a MaineCare fraud probe, embedded in the state’s official “New Americans” infrastructure linked to Governor Janet Mills.
This isn’t a conspiracy. It’s all public record.
Thread 🧵👇
It starts with Maine Gov. Janet Mills.
Mills launched the Office of New Americans alongside lawmakers, including Rep. Deqa Dhalac.
Rep. Deqa Dhalac worked with Gov. Janet Mills on legislation creating Maine’s Office of New Americans.
After that framework was established, Gateway Community Services Maine, listed by the state as part of that ecosystem, was awarded $500,000 in public funding through Maine CDC / DHHS programs.
Then, in December 2025, Maine DHHS suspended MaineCare payments to Gateway over suspected fraud.
‼️ Why would a Minnesota state House candidate be financially connected to a Maine nonprofit now facing a $1 million MaineCare fraud investigation and named in a congressional request for Treasury Suspicious Activity Reports?
That question now surrounds Abdi Daisane, the owner of Blooming Kids Child Care Center, whose business has recently been cited for more than 80 licensing violations. At the same time, his campaign finance filings reveal donor ties that reach far beyond Minnesota.
That alone raises concerns. But this isn’t just a story about local compliance failures or routine campaign fundraising.
When you follow the donor network, the picture stops looking local and starts pointing toward something much larger, more coordinated, and worth serious scrutiny.
I pulled Daisane’s donor list and I found a cluster that doesn’t make sense unless there’s coordination.
A group of Maine donors show up in his Minnesota filings, several at or near the max.
And the employer line is the tell: Gateway Community Services (Portland, Maine).
Straight from the report: multiple Portland-area donors list Gateway (or adjacent language access work) and hit the $1,000 level. That is not “random support.” That is a pipeline.
Now here’s why Gateway is not just “some nonprofit.”
On Dec. 23, 2025, Bangor Daily News reported Maine DHHS halted MaineCare payments to Gateway while investigating “credible allegations of fraud,” after reviewing claims and seeking to recoup nearly
$1 million.
Maine Public reported the same escalation and described a DHHS audit finding overbilling exceeding $1 million.
And yes, federal eyes are on the orbit. Bangor Daily News reported Homeland Security Investigations agents visited sites in Lewiston, including Gateway’s office, as part of what HSI described as business audits.
So read that again: a Minnesota candidate’s donor cluster runs into a Maine entity under a fraud probe and federal auditing pressure.