Will Solfiac Profile picture
May 4 5 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Can't believe I only just found out what 'institutional racism' as in the Stephen Lawrence enquiry actually means. I'd always assumed (and I'm sure this was the intention of the language) that it meant something like what people think of as racism, but rampant and normalised within an institution.

But in fact their idea of institutional racism is a mix of unprovable 'unconscious bias', insensitivity, and observations of things like black people being more likely to be stopped and searched. The actual deficiencies in the murder case are just generalised incompetence.

As they say: "In this Inquiry we have not heard evidence of overt racism or discrimination". What they're really talking about is: "Unwitting racism can arise because of lack of understanding, ignorance or mistaken beliefs. It can arise from well intentioned but patronising words or actions. It can arise from unfamiliarity with the behaviour or cultural traditions of people or families from minority ethnic communities. It can arise from racist stereotyping of black people as potential criminals or troublemakers."

This was the basis on which vast amounts of the British state was transformed.Image
Image
Much of the evidence seems to be that the police didn't deal sensitively with family and friends, and didn't view is as solely a racist attack. Whatever the truth of this, it's not very relevant to actually solving the case. Image
The full evidence for institutional racism: inensitivity, stop and search, under reporting of racist incidents, and not giving race awareness training to officers. Image
The evidence relating to the actual Stephen Lawrence case is just generalised incompetence. Image
Was pointed to this by Ed West's article here edwest.co.uk/p/britain-is-i…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Will Solfiac

Will Solfiac Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @willsolfiac

May 22
It's always useful to remember, for all the historical attention given to them, just how few European ships sailed to Asia before the 19th century. Around 5-10 a year in the 16th century, 30 a year in 1650, 75 a year in 1750. And these were not large ships either. Image
It's always a struggle to get a sense of the relative importance of various things to premodern economies. You have things like this Asian trade, which is very historically interesting and arouses strong passions, but is small in scale. Vs things like making rivers more navigable, and draining marshes in Europe, which isn't quite as exciting.
Other things I find interesting about this graph
- Strange that over the 16th century trade actually declined. Could Portugal just not make it work?
- It's often said that after the glorious revolution of 1688 trade primacy passed to England, but going by this graph that took another century, with the final blow being the Napoleonic wars, which really fucked Britain's competitors re Asian trade, especially the Netherlands.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 27
Interesting example in this video of the transformation of Islam in Britain - Mothin Ali's mother didn't wear a niqab, but his wife does.

Other than that, I thought it was hilarious that he seems to be claiming that back when the working class had more political power, they didn't see ethnic difference, only their shared 'chains of hardship and debt.' This has always been a left-wing fantasy with very little connection to reality. Working class British people have always strongly opposed mass immigration.
It's actually pretty slanderous to claim that people only oppose mass immigration and demographic replacement because Thatcher closed down their steel mills, meaning they fell under the sway of, formerly, the Daily Mail and, latterly, shadowy online right-wing influencers probably funded by the Russians.

People opposed it just as strongly in the 60s and 70s before deindustrialisation. False rhetoric like this obscures their agency and desire and willingness to stand up for their identity.
On the transformation of Islam thing, I also strongly doubt that any south asian Muslims who won council elections in Britain in the 20th century would ever have screamed allahu akbar in their victory speech
Read 4 tweets
Mar 14
Best moment in the Louis Theroux manosphere doc so far is about 20 minutes in when he asks this guy:

"So how many kids have you got?"

"I've got some, yeah."

"You know how many you've got, right?"

"Yeah, I think so."

"What's the number?"

"It's two." Image
And it later turns out he lives with these kids and their mother. Bizarre shift from the past where men would hide their indiscretions/illegitimate children behind a facade of monogamous family life. These guys promote a harem-style image while living conventional lives.
Same with the Myron Gaines scene later where he gets Myron to say in front of his girlfriend that he might take multiple wives in future. You can see from the dynamic that this will never happen, but he has to say it for his audience.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 24
New article — Grooming gangs and the failure of social science: How a 1980s study into Oxford's Pakistani community highlights the blindness of our institutions.

Stimulated by recently reading Alison Shaw's study, which put a lot of things into context.

willsolfiac.com/p/grooming-gan…
Read 4 tweets
Feb 15
Only just discovered Alison Shaw's study from 1988: A Pakistani Community in Britain. It's incredible reading as it explains the context of how the rape gangs developed so well.

In a better world this would have formed the basis of an official enquiry into immigration policy. Image
What's especially poignant about this study is that it was of the Pakistani community in Oxford, from where one of the many grooming gangs would emerge some years later.

This is something you always see. All this was known, and nothing was done.
One thing that's hardest to get your head round is the view of sexual morality whereby it's expected that men will, basically, rape women if they are unprotected by other men. And therefore nothing really has been done wrong if other men have left the women unprotected. Image
Read 6 tweets
Sep 19, 2025
I had a read of this paper. It's amazing how much faith Blair et al put in the idea of 'globalisation'. Barbara Roche said in 2000 "As with other aspects of globalisation, there are potentially huge economic benefits for Britain if it is able to adapt to the new environment."
"According to Blair the only ‘rational response’ to globalisation was ‘to manage it, prepare for it, and roll with it’ (Blair 2006).", ‘Migration is driven by globalisation’ (Home Office 2005, 11; Blair 2004)
"the logical extension of an ideology which hinged on globalisation was so deeply entrenched that with immigration being ‘the human element of globalisation’ (OECD 2009), it was ... assumed to be both inevitable and intrinsically positive by the leading faction of the Party"
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(