Here is a thread of each of the UFO videos released today by the Department of War.
DOW-UAP-PR43, Unresolved UAP Report, Africa, 2025
The United States Africa Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of two seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2025. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.
Video Description:00:00-00:02: A small, barely distinguishable area of contrast moves from the left side of the sensor field-of-view to the right side, exiting the scene from the bottom right quarter of the screen.
DOW-UAP-PR49, Unresolved UAP Report, Department of the Army, 2026
The Department of the Army submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of one minute and 49 seconds of video from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2026. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.
Video Description:
00:00-00:08: The sensor tracks an initial area of interest.
00:09-00:16: The sensor disengages from its previous area of focus and pans from right to left to track two areas of contrast, narrowing the field-of-view to zoom in while panning to maintain the objects' positions generally within the center of the frame.
00:17-01:03: The sensor widens its field-of-view to zoom out, keeping the areas of contrast generally centered within the display.
01:04-01:08: The sensor field-of-view rapidly cycles between levels of zoom, causing the areas of contrast to appear to rapidly increase and decrease in size.
01:09-01:48: The sensor tracks the areas of contrast while maintaining a generally centered position, intermittently cycling between contrast settings.
The United States Indo-Pacific Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of one minute and 39 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2024. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.
Video Description:
00:00-01:39: The sensor tracks an area of contrast, maintaining its position generally within the center of the frame.
The United States Indo-Pacific Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of one minute and 59 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2023. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.
Video Description:
00:00-01:59: The sensor tracks three distinct areas of contrast, maintaining their positions generally within the center of the frame. The areas of contrast appear to maintain a fixed position and orientation relative to one another.
The United States Indo-Pacific Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of nine seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2024. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.
Video Description:
00:00-00:09: The sensor focuses on an area of contrast that resembles a football-shaped body with three radial projections: one oriented vertically, and two oriented downward at a 45-degree angle relative to the major axis of the main mass.
The Department of the Air Force submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of 58 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.
Video Description:
00:00-00:03: The sensor tracks an area of contrast acquiring a reticle lock.
00:04-00:30: The area of contrast gradually increases in distinctiveness against the background.
00:31: The sensor narrows its field-of-view to zoom in on the area of contrast.
00:32-00:56: The area of contrast increases in apparent size and distinctiveness.
00:57-00:58: The area of contrast leaves the center of the frame and passes out of the sensor field-of-view, exiting the scene in the bottom right corner of the screen.
AARO Comment: The area of contrast’s apparent increase in size is likely to be at least partially attributable to the U.S. platform closing the distance between itself and the source of the detection.
The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of five minutes and 11 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.
Video Description: This video features incidentally recorded audio, which does not relate to the visual content described below.
00:00-00:30: No content.
00:31-03:24: The sensor pans down and to the right to focus on an area of contrast. The sensor tracks the area of contrast against the background for approximately three minutes, panning to maintain its position generally within the center of the frame. The sensor cycles contrast and zoom levels several times throughout, appearing as brief, bright white flashes across the frame.
03:25-04:23: The sensor cycles through reticles of various sizes while continuing to track the area of contrast. Between 04:20 and 04:23, the area of contrast briefly leaves the center of the sensor field-of-view.
04:24-04:50: The sensor field-of-view widens to zoom out from the scene, continuing to track the area of contrast.
04:50-04:54: The sensor stops tracking the area of contrast, at which point it exits the frame from the top left quadrant of the screen.
04:55-05:11: No content.
The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of four minutes and 53 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.
Video Description:
00:00-00:12: An area of contrast enters the sensor field-of-view from the bottom left corner of the frame. The sensor pans to track the area of contrast, keeping it generally within the lower left quadrant of the frame.
00:13-00:40: The area of contrast intermittently loses distinctiveness against the background, seeming to disappear and reappear irregularly.
00:41: The sensor narrows its field-of-view to zoom in on the area of contrast.
00:42-00:52: An area of contrast exits the sensor field-of-view from the left half of the top of the frame, after which the sensor pans up and to the left.
00:53-02:09: The sensor pans erratically, with an area of contrast appearing in a relatively fixed position to the left and slightly below the center of the frame.
02:09-02:29: The sensor switches imaging modalities, and the area of contrast appears to the right and slightly above the center of the frame.
02:30-04:53: The sensor switches imaging modalities again, and the area of contrast returns to its previous position to the left and slightly below the center of the frame.
The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of one minute and 34 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.
Video Description:
00:01: An area of contrast enters the sensor field-of-view from the bottom third of the left side of the screen.
00:02-01:34: The sensor pans from left to right, tracking the area of contrast and keeping it generally centered within the field-of-view.
The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of one minute and three seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. The original reporter digitally altered the imagery by pausing the video playback and adding a white line encircling an area of interest at timestamp 00:10, annotated with the phrase “U/I SMALL THERMAL SIGNATURE.” AARO did not edit the originally reported material, and this media is presented as received.
Video Description:
00:00-00:09: An area of contrast brightens within the sensor field-of-view, becoming increasingly distinct against the background.
00:10-00:14: Playback pauses to display a white line encircling an area of interest, annotated with the phrase “U/I SMALL THERMAL SIGNATURE.”
00:15-01:03: Playback resumes, with the sensor panning to track the area of contrast against the background, generally maintaining the area of contrast’s position within the top third of the display area. During this period, the sensor cycles through several contrast and zoom settings.
The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of one minute and 46 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2013. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.
Video Description: This video depicts an area of contrast resembling an eight-pointed star with arms of alternating length.
00:10: The sensor field-of-view narrows to zoom in on the area of contrast.
00:11-00:29: The area of contrast moves within the sensor field-of-view, followed by a visible trail.
00:30: The area of contrast leaves the sensor field-of-view at the bottom right of the screen.
00:35-01:44: Following an apparent cut, the area of contrast generally remains within the sensor field-of-view before exiting the frame from the top left quarter of the screen.
This video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.
The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of nine seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.
Video Description:
00:06-00:08: An area of contrast enters the sensor field-of-view from the bottom left quarter of the screen, follows a generally linear path from the bottom of the screen to the top, and exits from the top left quarter.
DOW-UAP-PR36, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, May 2020
The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of two minutes and 17 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. An accompanying Range Fouler report, DoW-UAP-D38, described the UAP as a solid white object making erratic movements above the water.
Video Description:
00:05: An area of contrast briefly enters the sensor field-of-view from the left side of the screen.
00:06-00:18: The sensor pans away from the scene’s initial subject matter while cycling contrast settings and zoom levels.
00:19: The area of contrast re-enters the sensor field-of-view from near the center of the top edge of the screen.
00:20-01:15: The area of contrast remains generally within the sensor field-of-view.
01:16: The sensor narrows its field-of-view to zoom in on the area of contrast.
01:56: The sensor further narrows its field-of-view to zoom in on the area of contrast.
02:10: A blue reticle briefly appears on screen but does not acquire a lock on the area of contrast.
02:15-02:17: The sensor switches to a different modality and loses track of the area of contrast.
DOW-UAP-PR35, Unresolved UAP Report, Greece, October 2023
The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of 24 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2023. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D35, described the UAP as small and circular, flying near the surface of the ocean toward land.
Video Description:
00:02: The sensor narrows its field-of-view to zoom in on an area of contrast near the center of the screen.
00:03-00:19: The sensor tracks the area of contrast as it moves against the ocean background.
00:20: As the background scene transitions from being predominantly water to land, the area of contrast becomes indistinguishable.
DOW-UAP-PR34, Unresolved UAP Report, Greece, October 2023
The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of two minutes and 57 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2023. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D33, described the UAP as flying near the surface of the ocean and making multiple “90-degree turns” at approximately 80 miles per hour.
Video Description:
00:04: An area of contrast enters the sensor field-of-view from the bottom left quarter of the screen.
00:07-00:19: The area of contrast moves back and forth horizontally across the field-of-view as the sensor pans to track it.
00:20-01:00: The area of contrast remains generally centered within the sensor field-of-view.
01:00-02:01: The sensor designates the area of contrast with a blue reticle, synchronizing its motion with the area of contrast’s relative position.
02:02-02:21: The sensor engages a contrast filter to better differentiate the area of contrast from the background.
02:22: The area of contrast becomes indistinguishable against the background, and the reticle drops its lock.
02:27-02:57: After losing lock, the sensor rapidly cycles zoom levels and contrast thresholds.
DOW-UAP-PR29, Unresolved UAP Report, United Arab Emirates, June 2024
The United States Northern Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of 21 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2024. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D8, described the UAP as consisting of an object with a vertical pole or bar attached to the bottom of the object. The observer also reported that the UAP may instead be a reflection from an object in the water.
Video Description:
00:00-00:21: An area of contrast visually resembling an inverted teardrop with a vertically linear trailing mass suspended below remains generally within the center of the sensor field-of-view throughout the video.
The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of five seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.
Video Description:
00:03-00:05: A faint area of contrast enters the sensor field-of-view from the bottom half of the right edge of the screen, proceeds from right to left across the corner of the frame, and exits the scene from near the center of the bottom edge of the screen.
DOW-UAP-PR33, Unresolved UAP Report, Syria, October 2024
The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of five seconds of video footage from a full-motion video (FMV) camera aboard a U.S. military platform in 2024. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D32, described the UAP as consisting of a “misshapen and uneven ball of white light,” and reported that a “light/glare halo effect” occurred at the top of the FMV feed.
Video Description:
00:01-00:03: Two semi-transparent, irregularly shaped orange areas overlay the background imagery, persisting for less than two seconds each.
DOW-UAP-PR31, Unresolved UAP Report, Syria, October 2024
The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of five seconds of video footage from a full-motion video (FMV) camera aboard a U.S. military platform in 2024. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D32, described the UAP as consisting of a “misshapen and uneven ball of white light,” and reported that a “light/glare halo effect” occurred at the top of the FMV feed.
Video Description:
00:00-00:01: An indistinctly shaped multi-colored area moves from right to left across the top edge of the sensor display within the first second of the video.
DOW-UAP-PR28, Unresolved UAP Report, Greece, January 2024
The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of one minute and five seconds of video footage captured via multiple sensor modalities aboard a U.S. military platform in 2024. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D7, described the UAP as “diamond-shaped” and moving at approximately 434 knots. The observer also reported that the UAP was only detectable via short-wave infrared (SWIR) sensor.
Video Description: The screen is split into two viewing areas for the first ten seconds of the video, with the right side displaying electro-optical footage and the left side displaying SWIR footage.
00:04: An area of contrast becomes distinguishable against the background in the center of the right frame.
00:10: The display shifts to a full-screen view of the SWIR feed to better focus on the area of contrast.
00:55: The area of contrast remains generally within the center of the sensor field-of-view. The area of contrast visually resembles an inverted teardrop with a vertically linear trailing mass suspended below.
00:56: The operator switches the sensor modality to visible spectrum, losing the subject against the background.
00:57-01:05: The operator switches the sensor modality to SWIR (Black-Hot) but does not reacquire the area of contrast.
DOW-UAP-PR27, Unresolved UAP Report, United Arab Emirates, October 2023
The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of four minutes and 57 seconds of video footage from an infrared (IR) sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2023. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D23, mentions a UAP was observed during the mission.
Video Description:
00:00-01:55: No content.
01:56: An area of contrast becomes distinguishable against the background in the center of the right side of the display.
02:04: The IR sensor pans to center on the area of contrast.
02:14: The sensor field-of-view narrows to zoom in on the area of contrast.
02:15-03:26: The area of contrast remains generally in the center of the sensor field-of-view.
03:27-04:57: The sensor motion causes the area of contrast to move erratically across the display. Due to this motion, the sensor system repeatedly loses and reacquires the area of contrast within the center area of the display.
DOW-UAP-PR26, Unresolved UAP Report, United Arab Emirates, October 2023
The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of a still image derived from a U.S. military system in 2022. The original reporter digitally altered the imagery by adding a red line encircling an area of interest before submitting it to AARO. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D12, described the UAP as moving from north to northeast. The operator reported that they were unable to positively identify the UAP.
Image Description: The image contains an encircled, elongated area of contrast in the top left quarter. The area of contrast increases in intensity along its length from top left to bottom right.
DOW-UAP-PR23, Unresolved UAP Report, Iraq, December 2022
The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of ten seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2022. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D18, described the UAP as "flying west to east."
Video Description: The video depicts an area of contrast moving from the bottom left to the top right of the sensor field-of-view. At approximately six seconds, the area of contrast leaves the sensor field-of-view near the top right corner of the frame.
DOW-UAP-PR32, Unresolved UAP Report, Syria, October 2024
The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of six seconds of video footage from a full-motion video (FMV) camera aboard a U.S. military platform in 2024. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D32, described the UAP as consisting of a “misshapen and uneven ball of white light,” and reported that a “light/glare halo effect” occurred at the top of the FMV feed.
Video Description:
00:02-00:04: An area of irregular color and brightness, mainly consisting of white and red highlights, appears near the center of the top edge of the sensor display. The area extends to a width of approximately one-third of the horizontal frame, with a vertical area comprising approximately one-sixth of the viewing area. Overall, its shape is best described as a horizontally-oriented half-oval bisected along its major axis.
DOW-UAP-PR22, Unresolved UAP Report, Syria, July 2022
The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of 14 seconds of video footage from an infrared (left) and electro-optical (right) sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2022. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D16, described the UAP as “moving from north to south.”
Video Description: At the five second mark, the video depicts an object moving from right to left across the top right quarter of the sensor field-of-view.
DOW-UAP-PR19, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, May 2022
The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of five seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2022. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D10, described the observation as a “possible missile” moving across the field-of-view. The report also described four other objects not depicted in the video as “possible birds.”
Video Description: At the two second mark, the video depicts an area of contrast moving from left to right across the bottom third of the sensor field-of-view.
DOW-UAP-PR21, Unresolved UAP Report, Iraq, May 2022
The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of ten seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2022. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D14, described the UAP as a “probable SU-27/35."
Video Description: The video depicts two areas of contrast moving together near the center of the field-of-view throughout the runtime.
AARO Comment: SU-27 and SU-35 are designations for military aircraft operated by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
(a 🧵)🚨 "...a story looking at the recent push for disclosure around UAPs..."
This was how the author (I was under the impression there was only one) described the recent WSJ two-part UAP piece. As promised, I waited until Part 2 came out to fully judge, but the final piece is clearly NOT what was pitched. Part 1 was largely unsourced with no real evidence presented, while Part 2 seemed to not be a "Part 2" at all, but dove in to mostly information that's already been published before with the exception of one thing that did interest me, but I'll get to that a different day because I'm not entirely convinced there's truth to it.
In this thread, I will not share any private communication out of respect to the author. Not that there is much to share in that regard (it was all phone calls, primarily), I do try to respect private communications with anyone if I don't explicitly get permission to share. Though I am happy to share 100% of what I sent over, because, well, I wrote it.
My conversations with the WSJ journo took place over numerous days that stretched out over a couple months. I was first approached on January 21st, and I was called numerous times from then over the course of the following few months. I spent, collectively, hours on the phone throughout those calls helping where I could, and saying I couldn't help where I couldn't if I didn't know. In case anyone wonders, and if it isn't obvious, you don't get paid for your time.
Topics included the Luis Elizondo story I've covered for years, the TTSA CRADA (which clearly were both in Part 2), but also the UAP cover-up overall, historical documents, UAP photos, the blanket over-classification of UAP visual imagery, tactics by the DoD to cover-up issues relating to this when using FOIA, AAWSAP, UAP Task Force, NASA UAP briefing material, CIA material often lost and the fact CIA material goes back decades/post Project Blue Book, the work of Travis Taylor in connection to the UAPTF, Jay Stratton with his work in the same, their joining the private industry, the DIA's connection to UAP, the cover-up and lost records at the DIA, Hal Puthoff and James Randi's debunk material found in the CIA archive (it specifically came up), the DoD's "unidentified helicopter" wave through the 1970s, and that was just stuff I sent evidence over of. I was asked numerous other questions on all sorts of things during those phone calls.
My angle has never been pushing the "alien" hypothesis. Rather, I push hard on why the secrecy exists. If you take most of the skeptical angles on UAP, much of the secrecy, to the extent it goes to, and the tactics that we see to cover it up, doesn't make sense. And as most of the world (and mainstream media) focuses on UFOlogy post 2017, the history (with evidence) shows this goes back much father, some of which, remains unexplained. And with the passage of time, the government loses more and more of that history (like the documents just disappear) and after filing 11,000 FOIA requests or so, I can tell you that although lost documents happen, it seems oddly unique to the UAP topic where the more interesting historical UAP records have all been lost from agencies including the CIA, NSA and Air Force.
So, with that in mind that the records I sent over were not trying to push the "alien" narrative, here is a breakdown of the material. Although I understand story angles can change, and the above list of issues is quite long and would require a book to properly cover, what the story was told to me (which is why I spent time helping) was wildly different than what was published. In addition, I found it strange that the document which WSJ made reference to (but didn't publish) seemed to magically appear on the DTIC's website in February of this year, coincidentally, within less than 2 weeks from the WSJ seemingly reaching out to people like me to research their story. A curious coincidence? Maybe. See the attached images for proof of that (images show Part 1 and Part 2 of the TEMPS [Transportable Electromagnetic Pulse Simulator] Final Reports, 1973).
That said, you will find * 100% * of the documentation I sent over in this thread, based on our conversations. The text I included in this thread below is what I sent to the WSJ, in its entirety. Nothing was edited or removed or altered.
🚨The alleged BAASS leaker is back with new images, and some damning allegations.
I won't vouch for the claims themselves, but given their history of posting these documents, it's noteworthy. The images are below, but it should be noted the Tipton/Elizondo email is not new.
A new, anonymous, person just posted a laundry list of claims relating to AAWSAP, BAASS, Luis Elizondo, and Jay Stratton (and more) on Reddit.
I usually ignore stories like this, but the person added numerous pages from BAASS reports that add some legitimacy to it.
Although this certainly doesn't validate the claims written, the report pages resemble other BAASS reports that have leaked and never really been disputed. Could they be fake? Of course. But it is worth considering.
This anonymous person is likely right that none of this is FOIAable, but it is probably not for the reason you are thinking. They are probably not because these are nothing more than BAASS reports done on their own, and not as a product or requirement for their DIA AAWSAP contract (despite the references to the contract number itself). This has been a long standing point I've made over the years that it was like there was an AAWSAP that was the DIA program, and then a BAASS/AAWSAP that maybe (definitely?) utilized those contract funds, but for a mission/objectives not asked for or sanctioned officially by the DIA (and by "DIA" that should not to be confused with the DIA director of the program who likely decided on his own to go beyond the scope of the official program).
I may add more later, but will let you all read it now. Reddit post in the thread below, followed by the pages. 👇
- REDDIT POST START (UNEDITED) -
I really did not want to write this. However after careful discussion with colleagues, I am going to go with what my gut tells I should do. I cannot sit on the sidelines while I observe the UAP field / narrative get filled with half-truths and obfuscations.
In this post, I will be providing evidence of documents that cannot be FOIA’d. I’ll even give my perspective on Anti-Gravity and the overall landscape of the current UAP field when it comes to intelligence agents that are masquerading as “truthers”. What I speak on is based on my own experiences and observations from being in the field for almost four decades.
I have a degree in electrical engineering from a college somewhere in the South of the USA. I will not say the name of the school because it will be very easy for people inside DoD to track me down if I give away too much considering not many were recruited from the college that I graduated from. I was recruited shortly out of college to work in black operations, specifically on the electrical engineering microelectronics & pulsed power side. These black programs do not necessarily care about your academic credentials as much as they are about two things: Can you think outside of the box, and can you shut the f*ck up about it.
I do not know everything, but the things I am sure of, I will write about here. Why am I doing this now? Because I was given 8 months to live and I will do what I can while alive to try and make a positive impact in the community. I sometimes cannot sleep seeing some of the blatant lies being fed to the community.
Let me put this bluntly before I get into the anti gravity and tech:
Jay Stratton and Lue Elizondo are one of the reasons that various inventors’ ZPE (zero point energy) devices have never seen the light of day. They have been personally responsible for destroying careers, families, and the mental well-being of various physicists and engineers over many decades. Lue used to be a counter intel agent for more than one WUSAP (Waived Unacknowledged Special Access Program) and did NOT get involved in the subject “by chance”. He and Stratton were involved long before the whole AATIP/AAWSAP saga.
Lue is not a bad person at heart, but it makes you wonder WHY he has done what he’s done in order to destroy others. I know many of you may judge this statement and think that I am defending him, but there ARE many good things that he has done in this field as well that many people likely will never know about. With that said, he is definitely compromised in terms of putting USA NAT SEC above all else, and that is a concern at this point. It is a concern because the DoD has long been infiltrated with war-mongers and profiteering cranks that want to keep all of this tech and knowledge silent for the sake of their own self-preservation. I gave him the benefit of the doubt at first, but this is getting to the point of blatant stupidity. To a very small extent, I don’t blame them. However, to hide this from humanity is becoming more of a curse than anything else. People have the right to know.
Jay Stratton, however, is a real scummy person. Don’t get me started on the shit that guy has done to some of my colleagues. I have zero sympathy for that man.
Sean Kirkpatrick is a pawn. He lies through his teeth like Ron Pandolfi has and does. To add, please do not ask me about Jack Sarfatti. He is considered a laughing stock to those involved in various programs.
Also, there are just over 2000 Legacy Programs working on reverse-engineering UAP. Hal Puthoff recently said on Joe Rogan that we have “more than ten” recovered craft in the USA. The number is in the hundreds. At a minimum.
Jeremy Corbell is a useful idiot in many cases. Some of what he releases is accurate, but when he says that us humans “cannot replicate or understand any propulsion systems” that craft use, or whatever nonsense he spews, is a blatant lie. I doubt he actually knows the truth to be fair so I do not believe that he is deliberately lying.
Dave Grusch, Jake Barber, Mike Herrera are the real deal. I respect them and their efforts. Let me say now: please do not ask me about Immaculate Constellation because I know nothing of any of those alleged specified programs. I am an electrical engineer, not a spy. However, being in this field, you pick up tradecraft methods and learn how to ‘run with the wolves’ so to speak.
Human beings, through both novel innovation and also through reverse-engineering (not mutually exclusive), have mastered anti-gravity to a certain degree. When I say “certain degree”, I mean operational craft that can leave our solar system. It sounds nuts, but it is the truth. Some have succeeded by means of pure human ingenuity, and others did it with access to recovered UAP materials. This level of mastery exceeds ANYTHING that even our most traditionally “secret” .MIL programs have. Booze Allen, Honeywell, Lockheed Martin, MITRE Corp, Raytheon, Boeing, etc all have their own versions of various anti gravity technologies. There is a difference between gravitational shielding/repulsion and actually generating HFGW (High Frequency Gravitational Waves).
The pursuit of Tomas Townsend Brown is exactly where people should be looking. Zero Point Energy manipulation has to do with the EM Vector Potential. That is as far as I will go on that.
I was involved in a project that utilized Tesla Turbines, Plasma Toroid chambers, Microwaves, Crystals, extremely strong Rotating Magnets, and various other obtainable components that generated many kilowatts of gravitational waves (or “gravitons” as some call it) in a private BaE Lab. The total cost of the project was just under 3 million USD to build the gravity generator. It can and has been done time and time again, successfully. Gravitational waves are measured electromagnetically due to it being a consequence of the curvature of spacetime itself.
Meta Materials are not needed to generate macroscopic proof of concept gravitational phenomena. Plain and simple.
You will notice in some of the files I am showing that the Soviets coined a term called “rotational gravitation” and believed that rotating masses acted as emitters and receivers of gravitational waves. I am not going to argue with those in the comments that say this isn’t possible, & I’m not going to argue with idiots that don’t know how to think outside of the box. My question is this: If the soviets thought it to be worthy of experimental investigation, then why is that not being done here?!! Oh wait, it is, it’s just going to stay forever classified. FOREVER.
Ask Jay Stratton why he prevented multiple inventors from getting their own laboratory. Because many of the inventors he suppressed focused on rotating capacitors, something the Soviets pursued very quickly. I’m sure his million-dollar book deal helped smooth over all the people he royally f*cked.
My beef is that we are classifying basic science that our adversaries are now discussing in more open forums and in peer-reviewed literature. It’s bullshit. All for what? So that Lockheed can make science breakthroughs proprietary and OWN it?
The closest I have seen anyone in the public domain get close to describing how the technology works is Lt. Col. Tom Bearden, and a few others. The tough part of all this is taking the theory and applying it to a practical experiment. Not many can bridge that divide, but a small, genius chunk of engineers (and some theoretical physicists) have.
You want to know who a REAL, high-level “gatekeeper” of this suff is? Admiral John Micheal “Mike” McConnell. He currently works at Booze Allen, or at least that was the last I had heard of his whereabouts.
I realize now that being given limited time on this planet makes you think about what should REALLY matter. I want the next generation to have a chance.
PS, the Tic Tac is ours (humans). I worked on certain aspects of it personally.
- REDDIT POST END -
🚨 Late last night, new JFK Files totaling 14,321 pages in 161 files were released. I already have these processed, and segmented out for a .zip download, if you need them. Here are some important links (a 🧵): 👇
First, the main archive page on The Black Vault continues to be updated as new documents are released. This holds every known page to have been released over the years pertaining to the assassination, including other FBI files, and records of interest. theblackvault.com/documentarchiv…
Second, the 161 pages released on March 20, 2025, are available for a different download so you can easily determine what is new. NARA erroneously marked them all as being released on March 18 (as of this post) which makes it challenging to see what was new.
Why does NASA want to hide behind a FOIA (b)(5) exemption on what their November 2024 UAP/UFO meeting (briefing) was about, which included NASA's Office of Inspector General? 👇
The meeting was sparked by Peter Meister, on behalf of the Office of the Inspector General.
Mr. Meister is the Senior Science Policy Specialist within NASA's Science Mission Directorate (SMD). 👇
In order to get OIG briefed on UAPs in November 2024, just a few months ago, he reached out to Mark McInerney, the now FORMER NASA Director of UAP Research. 👇
🧵 In a recent private ticketed event, former DoD counterintelligence agent Luis Elizondo showed this photo of a "UFO" from Romania in 2022.
He called it a "real photo" and references it being described as a "mothership" like the one in Close Encounters of the Third Kind. 👇
I reverse imaged searched it, and eventually turned up a viral post on Facebook in a group called "Mysterious Ancient Discoveries". It got more than 182,000 likes and more than 23,700 comments. It was posted in September 2023.👇
But, it reminded me of something. Years ago, a photo went viral, which although did not look like this, I believe the process it was captured was the same.
Check out this. Through clouds - shot through a window, of a "UFO." It went viral, but the problem, was it wasn't real. 👇