Post

https://x.com/sarahadams/status/2053666592521646270?s=20

More from @angertab

Matt Tardio

@angertab

Mar 9

The evidence is clear, this is not a Tomahawk

Iran alleged that an American Tomahawk Cruise Missile hit a school (buried in an IRGC compound) in southern Iran, killing 165 people.

Analysis of a newly released video tells a different story.

ANALYSIS:
A-I analysis confirms the wings of the munition in question sit about 40%-45% down the body of the munition. On a Tomahawk, the wings sit roughly 49%-50% down the body of the munition.

The wing to body ratio of the munition in question matches an Iranian Kh-55–derived Land Attack Cruise Missile.

Further, the video shows the munition in a steep dive angle for the final attack phase. This places the attack angle at approximately 70%, which is the max attack angle for a Tomahawk.

The attack angle does not match the KH-55. That angle maxes out at about 55 degrees. So what would have caused this?

CONCLUSION:
The wing positioning alone makes the munition impossible to be a Tomahawk. The attack angle is at the max of the Tomahawk's capabilities. The typical attack angle for a Tomahawk is much lower than 70 degrees. The typical angle is between 20-45 degrees.

This is due to the flight pattern of Tomahawks. They fly very low horizontally to the ground, often only 50-100 meters AGL to avoid detection and interception. In order to achieve that attack angle, the missile would have had to gain altitude several kilometers away, this would leave it vulnerable for interception. This is highly unlikely on the first day of US attacks.

So what could have caused this?
Simply put, GPS jamming of an Iranian KH-55. The USA and Israel were, and continue to actively jam the Iranian airspace.

If the KH-55's signal was jammed, this could result in an uncontrollable dive. Think of GPS jamming more like disorienting the missile.

On 03/07 President Trump stated:
“No, in my opinion, based on what I’ve seen, that was done by Iran.”

Today, I concur with the President.

https://x.com/CENTCOM/status/2031006268270252288?s=20

Telling lies. Typical of Russians and Iranians.

https://x.com/CENTCOM/status/2031006268270252288?s=20

Facts matter. If this munition fit the physical profile of a Tomahawk, I would have said so.

Those of you who have followed me long enough know that I will show the data regardless of who is to blame.

It just so happens that the data has a trend when dealing with Radical Islamists.

They lie.

Read 6 tweets

Matt Tardio

@angertab

Dec 18, 2025

https://x.com/angertab/status/2001453737957626304

BUSTED!
Looks like there was a camera in the room after all.

Officials state there are no cameras in the older portion of the Barus and Holley building where the shooting occurred at Brown University.

Google images shows several photos that appear to be from the same elevated location inside of "classroom 166" where the shooting is said to have occurred.

Yesterday, a local news reporter erupted during a briefing by authorities. He claimed his friend is a Detective who is furious that evidence is being purposefully hidden from authorities.

https://x.com/angertab/status/2001453737957626304

In all fairness, these could just be pictures that were taken from someone standing at the top of the stairs looking down at the lecture hall, but I seriously doubt it.

https://x.com/angertab/status/2001631011717918995?s=20

https://x.com/angertab/status/2001631011717918995?s=20

Read 5 tweets

Matt Tardio

@angertab

Sep 18, 2025

A COGAT Official informed me that 120 Tons of contraband was confiscated from humanitarian aid trucks attempting to enter Gaza in the last week alone.🧵

Below:
Sulfuric Acid (explosives precursor) at Kerem Shalom Crossing

Camouflage uniforms, tactical gloves, and a Palestinian Islamic Jihad patch confiscated by COGAT from humanitarian aid trucks.

Confiscated contraband also included tobacco and narcotics.

These items are often sold at inflated prices by Hamas in Gaza to fund their Jihad.

Note:
A main HA truck route enters Israel via Jordan.

Read 4 tweets

Matt Tardio

@angertab

Sep 9, 2025

Do you think Israel's strike against Hamas leadership in Qatar was legal?

International law says it was, here is why🧵

1⃣“Hamas’ armed wing, the al-Qassam Brigades, on Tuesday claimed responsibility for the shooting that killed six people on the outskirts of Jerusalem on Monday.” - Reuters

Zaher Jabarin, commander of Hamas in the West Bank, was reportedly a target of the strike in Doha and is reported to have survived the strike.

U.N. Charter Article 51 states:
"Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security.

The attack claimed by Hamas yesterday, originating from the West Bank makes Jabarin a legitimate target under international law for self-defense.

2⃣In addition to Jabarin being present, so was Khalil al-Hayya. As the senior-most exiled leader of Hamas, al-Hayya has been exercising control over all hostages currently held by Hamas through negotiations.

He exercises the power to make life and death decisions of all the hostages currently held in direct violation of the UN's Convention Against the Taking of Hostages (1979), which defines hostage taking as:

“Seizing or detaining … and threatening to kill, to injure or to continue to detain him in order to compel a third party … to do or abstain from doing any act as an explicit or implicit condition for the release of the hostage.”

This constitutes an ongoing threat to Israeli citizens under international law, and again, Israel's right to self-defense can be applied. Israel's Entebbe raid of 1972 is a great example of this law application, and it was accepted on an international level.

With Israel about to enter Gaza City in an attempt to recover hostages, striking the man exercising control over their lives also applies to self-defense under UN Charter Article 51 as an ongoing attack.

Read 4 tweets

Matt Tardio

@angertab

Sep 6, 2025

Is this evidence that an IDF tank targeted a bus full of kids? No.

Those "Aid Workers" started that fire, and I can prove it. 🧵

1⃣Let's start with the opening frame.

When the camera turns on, there is no tire track visible leading up to the van, nor is there a MASSIVE burn mark.

After they run away from the vehicle, you can see a new tire track, foot prints AND A BRAND NEW BURN MARK leading straight up to the van. It's almost like they back their ambulance up, dumped fuel all over the vehicle and left a trail of gasoline to start the fire again!

Further, there are zero signs of a blast taking place. No ripples in the sand, no anything.

2⃣Examining the interior.

The rear sliding door is clearly attached and was opened. This is highly unlikely following a hot blaze. Thick gloves to protect the workers would need to be worn. One aid worker can be seen wearing nitrile gloves. Obviously that wouldn't help.

Following a large blaze such as this, the probability of that door properly functioning is extremely low. Plastic would be melted over the moving parts, heat causes metal to expand, and the door would be jammed.

There are also zero signs this vehicle was struck by ANY munition. Nor can any gunfire be heard throughout the video. Even the ground behind the vehicle appears as if it has been covered by sand from wind.

Read 4 tweets

Matt Tardio

@angertab

Aug 29, 2025

Stop trusting MSM 🧐

SkyNews published a full "analysis" utilizing a fake video straight out of @GAZAWOOD1 as evidence.

Their analyst predicted "laser-guided" missiles had hit the Nassar Hospital based on an A-I edited video. 🧵

1⃣Their first hint should have been the damage to the vertical wall of the staircase following the first round's impact.

This does not show a top-attack, or even a side-attack. Simply a front-attack with a point detonation munition, when it hit the vertical wall it detonated.

2⃣Their second hint should have been this frame. A HOLE WAS CREATED in the front side of the building.

This is consistent with the damage from the first round, only this time it appears the round had a delayed detonation.

We call this "a clue".

Read 4 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Matt Tardio

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @angertab

Matt Tardio

Matt Tardio

Matt Tardio

Matt Tardio

Matt Tardio

Matt Tardio

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!