Frédéric Bastiat’s essay “That Which Is Seen and That Which Is Not Seen” (1850) contains one of the clearest and most powerful insights in economics. Bastiat observed that people - including policymakers - focus almost exclusively on immediate, visible results (the “seen”) while ignoring the hidden, long-term consequences (the “unseen”).
Take his famous broken-window parable: a shopkeeper’s window is smashed; the glazier is hired, earns money, and as he spends it elsewhere, onlookers declare the economy stimulated. What is seen is the new job and spending, but what is unseen is what the shopkeeper could have done with that same money - buying a new suit, repairing his roof or investing in his business. Society ends up with one window instead of a window plus a suit. Destruction does not create net wealth; it merely redirects it and conceals the loss.
Bastiat applied the same logic to government spending, public works, subsidies, and even war. Every franc taken in taxes or borrowed is a franc that cannot be used by individuals for their own purposes. The jobs “created” by the state are visible; the jobs, innovations, and goods never produced because resources were diverted are invisible.
This single insight exposes why so many well-intentioned policies fail. Real prosperity grows from the unseen choices of free individuals, not from the visible hand of the state.
Every year, over 25,000 people are serious injured in traffic accidents in the UK, including around 1,750 deaths.
Now, imagine politicians and the media treated road casualties the way they treat Covid. 1/11
Every day, the government would publish the number of casualties: "400 seriously injured and 5 people died on the roads yesterday."
The media treat this as headline news. Politicians opine on how it is time to act. 2/11
Victims of accidents tell harrowing stories of injury; families tell of loved ones lost . Every day, "experts" are interviewed, telling us that if we reduce the speed limit and regulate amount of traffic on the roads, we could save lives - in papers, on the radio and on TV. 3/11
Had a fair amount of interaction with actual communists these last days, as a result of a tweet about a statue of Friedrich Engels.
It was eye opening.
As expected, most of them are poorly educated and have only superficial knowledge of Marxism and history. They retort with attempted jokes (countless of them comment that Engels is "sexy," for example) and insults.
But the real story is when they start arguing.
Many say Marx and Engels, being writers, should be absolved from responsibility for what happened when their theory was attempted in practise.
Unfortunately, that's most often what actually happens, unlike with Nazism, where theory and practice are seen as intrinsically linked.